Swiss vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Swiss
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Swiss
Iroquois
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Swiss Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,110,794 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 8.8 Iroquois.
Swiss vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $87,255, a difference of 18.1%), and median household income ($85,681 compared to $74,279, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $36,408, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $42,430, a difference of 9.1%).
Income Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,076 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,396 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,681 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,315 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,731 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,904 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,493 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,511 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $103,071 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,621 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 30.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Swiss vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 39.7%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.8%).
Poverty Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Swiss vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.9%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Swiss vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.3% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 80.6% |
Swiss vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and married-couple households (49.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.24%), family households (65.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 38.2% |
Swiss vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.0% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 6.5% |
Swiss vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.5%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.6% |
Swiss vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Swiss | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |