Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Iroquois
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,569,245 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to a decrease of 61.2 Iroquois.
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $39,104, a difference of 20.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $83,682, a difference of 18.8%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $90,543, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $47,380, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $36,408, a difference of 12.1%).
Income Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,248 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,502 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,635 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,617 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,572 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,825 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,113 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,449 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,777 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,093 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Excellent 25.1% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 42.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.3%).
Poverty Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Unemployment Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 80.6% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.06 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.9% | Tragic 38.2% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.7% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Good 6.5% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.6%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.1% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
Disability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |