French vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
French
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French
Iroquois
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in French Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,027,494 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 32.5 Iroquois.
French vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $87,255, a difference of 14.4%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $90,543, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($46,296 compared to $42,430, a difference of 9.1%).
Income Metric | French | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,685 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,368 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,468 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,296 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,350 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,457 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,230 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,665 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,824 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,656 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
French vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.45%), single father poverty (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.8%).
Poverty Metric | French | Iroquois |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
French vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | French | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
French vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | French | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.1% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
French vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.0%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | French | Iroquois |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 38.2% |
French vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.4% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Good 6.5% |
French vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | French | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.9% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.4% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.5% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
French vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.40%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | French | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |