Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Iroquois
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,314,339 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Iroquois.
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,541 compared to $74,279, a difference of 23.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $87,255, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $83,682, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($43,539 compared to $39,104, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $36,408, a difference of 11.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,539 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,252 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,541 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,671 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,241 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,558 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,714 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $100,283 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,109 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,089 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.8% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 39.7%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.7% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.8% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.8% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.8%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.2%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.16, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.6% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.8%), bachelor's degree (36.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.2% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.2% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.8% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.48%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |