Hmong vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Iroquois
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,006,113 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Iroquois.
Hmong vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $53,737, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $47,380, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $83,682, a difference of 0.69%), median earnings ($42,111 compared to $42,430, a difference of 0.76%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $90,543, a difference of 0.83%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
Hmong vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 25.4%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.5%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Hmong vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 47.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Hmong vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 80.6% |
Hmong vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Hmong vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.48%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 6.5% |
Hmong vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 4.6%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Hmong vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |