Norwegian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Norwegian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Norwegians
Iroquois
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Norwegian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,305,636 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Iroquois.
Norwegian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $87,255, a difference of 18.8%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $90,543, a difference of 17.2%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $74,279, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $36,408, a difference of 6.6%), median earnings ($46,865 compared to $42,430, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $47,380, a difference of 12.1%).
Income Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,480 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,144 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,084 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,865 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,965 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,802 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,127 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,866 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,682 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,104 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Norwegian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 55.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 53.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.1%).
Poverty Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.7% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Norwegian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Norwegian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 80.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
Norwegian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 30.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.08 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.5%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.08 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.2% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.3% | Tragic 38.2% |
Norwegian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 70.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 22.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 62.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Good 6.5% |
Norwegian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 94.0% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.5% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.5% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Norwegian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Disability Metric | Norwegian | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |