Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Iroquois
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,135,693 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $53,737, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($94,665 compared to $90,543, a difference of 4.5%), and median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,709 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,665 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,722 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,532 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,642 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $39,910 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,714 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,448 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $92,208 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,394 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.9% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.54%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 6.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 32.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 70.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (43.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.1% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.9% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 135.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 65.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 20.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 55.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 25.8% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 74.3% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 38.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.5% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.9% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.1%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.0% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.5% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.5% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.2% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.8% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.5%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.85% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |