Major party candidates with major party competition in the November 2016 state legislative elections
2016 State Legislative Elections | |
---|---|
2017 »
« 2015
| |
Part 1: Overview | |
Part 2: Battlegrounds | |
Part 3: Competitiveness | |
Impact of term limits | |
Part 4: Elections by state | |
Election dates |
2016 Elections | |
---|---|
Choose a chamber below: | |
In the 44 states with elections there were 5,923 state legislative seats up for election on November 8, 2016.[1]
How many general elections featured candidates from both major parties?
At any given time, roughly 98% of all 7,383 state legislators are either Democratic or Republican. In Nebraska, all 49 state senators are elected as nonpartisan officials. Thus, in the remaining 49 states, either a Democratic or Republican candidate is virtually guaranteed victory in a general election. Given that major party candidates win nearly 100% of the time, a candidate running without any major party opposition is essentially assured election -- even if there are third party candidates.
- There was only one major party candidate in 2,477 (41.8%) of the 5,923 seats up for election in 2016.
- There was more than one major party candidate in 3,446 (58.2%) of the 5,923 seats up for election in 2016. In 2014, 3,451 (57.0%) seats had two or more major party candidates.
The top five states ranked by general election competition include:
The lowest ranking states included:
- 44. Georgia
- 43. Massachusetts
- 42. South Carolina
- 41. Arkansas
- 40. Rhode Island
States compared by major party opposition in the general election
The following table details the number of seats where a general election was held between two or more partisan candidates in 2016.
Seats up represents the number of seats with elections in both chambers of the state. Each state is ranked, with the highest percentage of general election competition at rank one. Overall competitive rank is based on composite scores from data collected on open seats, incumbents facing primary opposition and seats with more than one general election candidate.
Note: Nebraska is officially a nonpartisan legislature. Thus, in order to include that election in the index, we counted any district where a candidate faced no general election competition as qualifying under the "no major competition" category.
Seats without major party opposition | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chamber | Seats up | Democratic seats | % of races | Republican seats | % of races | Other seats | Total | % of races |
Alaska State Senate | 10 | 2 | 20.00% | 4 | 40.00% | 0 | 6 | 60.00% |
Alaska State House | 40 | 9 | 22.50% | 6 | 15.00% | 0 | 15 | 37.50% |
Alaska Total | 50 | 11 | 22.00% | 10 | 20.00% | 0 | 21 | 42.00% |
Arizona State Senate | 30 | 8 | 26.70% | 6 | 20.00% | 0 | 14 | 46.70% |
Arizona State House | 60 | 17 | 28.30% | 17 | 28.30% | 0 | 34 | 56.70% |
Arizona Total | 90 | 25 | 27.78% | 23 | 25.56% | 0 | 48 | 53.30% |
Arkansas State Senate | 17 | 4 | 23.50% | 10 | 58.80% | 0 | 14 | 82.40% |
Arkansas State House | 100 | 23 | 23.00% | 52 | 52.00% | 0 | 75 | 75.00% |
Arkansas Total | 117 | 27 | 23.08% | 62 | 52.99% | 0 | 89 | 76.10% |
California State Senate | 20 | 6 | 30.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 6 | 30.00% |
California State House | 80 | 16 | 20.00% | 5 | 6.30% | 0 | 21 | 26.30% |
California Total | 100 | 22 | 22.00% | 5 | 5.00% | 0 | 27 | 27.00% |
Colorado State Senate | 18 | 2 | 11.10% | 2 | 11.10% | 0 | 4 | 22.20% |
Colorado State House | 65 | 6 | 9.20% | 6 | 9.20% | 0 | 12 | 18.50% |
Colorado Total | 83 | 8 | 9.64% | 8 | 9.64% | 0 | 16 | 19.30% |
Connecticut State Senate | 36 | 3 | 8.30% | 1 | 2.80% | 0 | 4 | 11.10% |
Connecticut State House | 151 | 18 | 11.90% | 26 | 17.20% | 0 | 44 | 29.10% |
Connecticut Total | 187 | 21 | 11.23% | 27 | 14.44% | 0 | 48 | 25.70% |
Delaware State Senate | 11 | 3 | 27.30% | 2 | 18.20% | 0 | 5 | 45.50% |
Delaware State House | 41 | 17 | 41.50% | 7 | 17.10% | 0 | 24 | 58.50% |
Delaware Total | 52 | 20 | 38.46% | 9 | 17.31% | 0 | 29 | 55.80% |
Florida State Senate | 40 | 7 | 17.50% | 15 | 37.50% | 0 | 22 | 55.00% |
Florida State House | 120 | 29 | 24.20% | 34 | 28.30% | 0 | 63 | 52.50% |
Florida Total | 160 | 36 | 22.50% | 49 | 30.63% | 0 | 85 | 53.10% |
Georgia State Senate | 56 | 14 | 25.00% | 29 | 51.80% | 0 | 43 | 76.80% |
Georgia State House | 180 | 51 | 28.30% | 98 | 54.40% | 0 | 149 | 82.80% |
Georgia Total | 236 | 65 | 27.54% | 127 | 53.81% | 0 | 192 | 81.40% |
Hawaii State Senate | 14 | 9 | 64.30% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 9 | 64.30% |
Hawaii State House | 51 | 23 | 45.10% | 2 | 3.90% | 0 | 25 | 49.00% |
Hawaii Total | 65 | 32 | 49.23% | 2 | 3.08% | 0 | 34 | 52.30% |
Idaho State Senate | 35 | 2 | 5.70% | 13 | 37.10% | 0 | 15 | 42.90% |
Idaho State House | 70 | 4 | 5.70% | 24 | 34.30% | 0 | 28 | 40.00% |
Idaho Total | 105 | 6 | 5.71% | 37 | 35.24% | 0 | 43 | 41.00% |
Illinois State Senate | 40 | 19 | 47.50% | 8 | 20.00% | 0 | 27 | 67.50% |
Illinois State House | 118 | 45 | 38.10% | 27 | 22.90% | 0 | 72 | 61.00% |
Illinois Total | 158 | 64 | 40.51% | 35 | 22.15% | 0 | 99 | 62.70% |
Indiana State Senate | 25 | 5 | 20.00% | 5 | 20.00% | 0 | 10 | 40.00% |
Indiana State House | 100 | 15 | 15.00% | 17 | 17.00% | 0 | 32 | 32.00% |
Indiana Total | 125 | 20 | 16.00% | 22 | 17.60% | 0 | 42 | 33.60% |
Iowa State Senate | 25 | 2 | 8.00% | 7 | 28.00% | 0 | 9 | 36.00% |
Iowa State House | 100 | 28 | 28.00% | 15 | 15.00% | 0 | 43 | 43.00% |
Iowa Total | 125 | 30 | 24.00% | 22 | 17.60% | 0 | 52 | 41.60% |
Kansas State Senate | 40 | 4 | 10.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 4 | 10.00% |
Kansas State House | 125 | 19 | 15.20% | 32 | 25.60% | 0 | 51 | 40.80% |
Kansas Total | 165 | 23 | 13.94% | 32 | 19.39% | 0 | 55 | 33.30% |
Kentucky State Senate | 19 | 6 | 31.60% | 7 | 36.80% | 0 | 13 | 68.40% |
Kentucky State House | 100 | 10 | 10.00% | 25 | 25.00% | 0 | 35 | 35.00% |
Kentucky Total | 119 | 16 | 13.45% | 32 | 26.89% | 0 | 48 | 40.30% |
Maine State Senate | 35 | 2 | 5.70% | 2 | 5.70% | 4 | 11.40% | |
Maine State House | 151 | 8 | 5.30% | 6 | 4.00% | 14 | 9.30% | |
Maine Total | 186 | 10 | 5.38% | 8 | 4.30% | 0 | 18 | 9.70% |
Massachusetts State Senate | 40 | 24 | 60.00% | 3 | 7.50% | 0 | 27 | 67.50% |
Massachusetts State House | 160 | 110 | 68.80% | 17 | 10.60% | 0 | 127 | 79.40% |
Massachusetts Total | 200 | 134 | 67.00% | 20 | 10.00% | 0 | 154 | 77.00% |
Michigan State House | 110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Michigan Total | 110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | ||
Minnesota State Senate | 67 | 2 | 3.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 3.00% | |
Minnesota State House | 134 | 3 | 2.20% | 2 | 1.50% | 5 | 3.70% | |
Minnesota Total | 201 | 5 | 2.49% | 2 | 1.00% | 0 | 7 | 3.50% |
Missouri State Senate | 18 | 4 | 22.20% | 4 | 22.20% | 0 | 8 | 44.40% |
Missouri State House | 163 | 30 | 18.40% | 67 | 41.10% | 0 | 97 | 59.50% |
Missouri Total | 181 | 34 | 18.78% | 71 | 39.23% | 0 | 105 | 58.00% |
Montana State Senate | 25 | 2 | 8.00% | 2 | 8.00% | 0 | 4 | 16.00% |
Montana State House | 100 | 16 | 16.00% | 2 | 2.00% | 0 | 18 | 18.00% |
Montana Total | 125 | 18 | 14.40% | 4 | 3.20% | 0 | 22 | 17.60% |
Nebraska State Senate | 25 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
Nebraska Total | 25 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 16.00% | ||
Nevada State Senate | 11 | 2 | 18.20% | 1 | 9.10% | 0 | 3 | 27.30% |
Nevada State House | 42 | 3 | 7.10% | 7 | 16.70% | 0 | 10 | 23.80% |
Nevada Total | 53 | 5 | 9.43% | 8 | 15.09% | 0 | 13 | 24.50% |
New Hampshire State Senate | 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
New Hampshire State House | 400 | 56 | 14.00% | 32 | 8.00% | 0 | 88 | 22.00% |
New Hampshire Total | 424 | 56 | 13.21% | 32 | 7.55% | 0 | 88 | 20.80% |
New Mexico State Senate | 42 | 18 | 42.90% | 9 | 21.40% | 0 | 27 | 64.30% |
New Mexico State House | 70 | 27 | 38.60% | 16 | 22.90% | 0 | 43 | 61.40% |
New Mexico Total | 112 | 45 | 40.18% | 25 | 22.32% | 0 | 70 | 62.50% |
New York State Senate | 63 | 15 | 23.80% | 9 | 14.30% | 0 | 24 | 38.10% |
New York State House | 150 | 48 | 32.00% | 17 | 11.30% | 0 | 65 | 43.30% |
New York Total | 213 | 63 | 29.58% | 26 | 12.21% | 0 | 89 | 41.80% |
North Carolina State Senate | 50 | 6 | 12.00% | 12 | 24.00% | 0 | 18 | 36.00% |
North Carolina State House | 120 | 31 | 25.80% | 27 | 22.50% | 0 | 58 | 48.30% |
North Carolina Total | 170 | 37 | 21.76% | 39 | 22.94% | 0 | 76 | 44.70% |
North Dakota State Senate | 23 | 0 | 0.00% | 4 | 17.40% | 4 | 17.40% | |
North Dakota State House | 47 | 1 | 2.10% | 2 | 4.30% | 3 | 6.40% | |
North Dakota Total | 70 | 1 | 1.43% | 6 | 8.57% | 0 | 7 | 10.00% |
Ohio State Senate | 16 | 0 | 0.00% | 3 | 18.80% | 0 | 3 | 18.80% |
Ohio State House | 99 | 8 | 8.10% | 19 | 19.20% | 0 | 27 | 27.30% |
Ohio Total | 115 | 8 | 6.96% | 22 | 19.13% | 0 | 30 | 26.10% |
Oklahoma State Senate | 25 | 1 | 4.00% | 7 | 28.00% | 0 | 8 | 32.00% |
Oklahoma State House | 101 | 10 | 9.90% | 21 | 20.80% | 0 | 31 | 30.70% |
Oklahoma Total | 126 | 11 | 8.73% | 28 | 22.22% | 0 | 39 | 31.00% |
Oregon State Senate | 15 | 5 | 33.30% | 2 | 13.30% | 0 | 7 | 46.70% |
Oregon State House | 60 | 12 | 20.00% | 8 | 13.30% | 0 | 20 | 33.30% |
Oregon Total | 75 | 17 | 22.67% | 10 | 13.33% | 0 | 27 | 36.00% |
Pennsylvania State Senate | 25 | 6 | 24.00% | 7 | 28.00% | 0 | 13 | 52.00% |
Pennsylvania State House | 203 | 47 | 23.20% | 51 | 25.10% | 0 | 98 | 48.30% |
Pennsylvania Total | 228 | 53 | 23.25% | 58 | 25.44% | 0 | 111 | 48.70% |
Rhode Island State Senate | 38 | 26 | 68.40% | 2 | 5.30% | 0 | 28 | 73.70% |
Rhode Island State House | 75 | 48 | 64.00% | 2 | 2.70% | 1 | 51 | 68.00% |
Rhode Island Total | 113 | 74 | 65.49% | 4 | 3.54% | 1 | 79 | 69.90% |
South Carolina State Senate | 46 | 11 | 23.90% | 27 | 58.70% | 0 | 38 | 82.60% |
South Carolina State House | 124 | 34 | 27.40% | 58 | 46.80% | 0 | 92 | 74.20% |
South Carolina Total | 170 | 45 | 26.47% | 85 | 50.00% | 0 | 130 | 76.50% |
South Dakota State Senate | 35 | 6 | 17.10% | 9 | 25.70% | 0 | 15 | 42.90% |
South Dakota State House | 70 | 7 | 10.00% | 16 | 22.90% | 0 | 23 | 32.90% |
South Dakota Total | 105 | 13 | 12.38% | 25 | 23.81% | 0 | 38 | 36.20% |
Tennessee State Senate | 16 | 1 | 6.30% | 10 | 62.50% | 0 | 11 | 68.80% |
Tennessee State House | 99 | 17 | 17.20% | 31 | 31.30% | 0 | 48 | 48.50% |
Tennessee Total | 115 | 18 | 15.65% | 41 | 35.65% | 0 | 59 | 51.30% |
Texas State Senate | 16 | 6 | 37.50% | 6 | 37.50% | 0 | 12 | 75.00% |
Texas State House | 150 | 38 | 25.30% | 60 | 40.00% | 0 | 98 | 65.30% |
Texas Total | 166 | 44 | 26.51% | 66 | 39.76% | 0 | 110 | 66.30% |
Utah State Senate | 15 | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 33.30% | 0 | 5 | 33.30% |
Utah State House | 75 | 6 | 8.00% | 22 | 29.30% | 0 | 28 | 37.30% |
Utah Total | 90 | 6 | 6.67% | 27 | 30.00% | 0 | 33 | 36.70% |
Vermont State Senate | 30 | 13 | 43.30% | 3 | 10.00% | 0 | 16 | 53.30% |
Vermont State House | 150 | 56 | 37.30% | 24 | 16.00% | 0 | 80 | 53.30% |
Vermont Total | 180 | 69 | 38.33% | 27 | 15.00% | 0 | 96 | 53.30% |
Washington State Senate | 26 | 5 | 19.20% | 7 | 26.90% | 0 | 12 | 46.20% |
Washington State House | 98 | 22 | 22.40% | 13 | 13.30% | 0 | 35 | 35.70% |
Washington Total | 124 | 27 | 21.77% | 20 | 16.13% | 0 | 47 | 37.90% |
West Virginia State Senate | 18 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
West Virginia State House | 100 | 5 | 5.00% | 17 | 17.00% | 0 | 22 | 22.00% |
West Virginia Total | 118 | 5 | 4.24% | 17 | 14.41% | 0 | 22 | 18.60% |
Wisconsin State Senate | 16 | 5 | 31.30% | 3 | 18.80% | 0 | 8 | 50.00% |
Wisconsin State House | 99 | 28 | 28.30% | 21 | 21.20% | 0 | 49 | 49.50% |
Wisconsin Total | 115 | 33 | 28.70% | 24 | 20.87% | 0 | 57 | 49.60% |
Wyoming State Senate | 15 | 1 | 6.70% | 4 | 26.70% | 0 | 5 | 33.30% |
Wyoming State House | 60 | 4 | 6.70% | 9 | 15.00% | 0 | 13 | 21.70% |
Wyoming Total | 75 | 5 | 6.67% | 13 | 17.33% | 0 | 18 | 24.00% |
Overall Total | 1262 | 21.30% | 1210 | 20.40% | 5 | 2477 | 41.80% |
Number of candidates running
Ballotpedia compared the number of partisan candidates that ran for election in 2016 to the number of candidates that ran in 2014. Adjusting for the number of seats up for election, more Democratic candidates ran for election in 2016 than did in 2014. Fewer Republican candidates ran for election in 2016, but by a marginal amount.[2][3]
The following table details, by state, how many candidates ran for election in 2016 and 2014. The raw difference in number of candidates between 2016 and 2014 is provided. The difference by percent has been adjusted to take into account how many seats were up for election in the state.[4]
Comparing the number of candidates running | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Filing deadline | 2016 Seats up | 2016 Dem. candidates | 2016 Repub. candidates | 2014 Seats up | 2014 Dem. candidates | 2014 Repub. candidates | Dem. difference (2016) | % | Repub. difference (2016) | % |
Total | 5,898 | 5,903 | 6,042 | 5,704 | 5,293 | 5,915 | 610 | 107.9% | 127 | 98.8% | |
Arkansas | November 9 | 117 | 58 | 111 | 118 | 74 | 109 | -16 | 79.0% | 2 | 102.7% |
Illinois | November 30 | 158 | 145 | 118 | 137 | 121 | 110 | 24 | 103.9% | 8 | 93.0% |
Texas | December 14 | 166 | 138 | 193 | 165 | 117 | 190 | 21 | 117.2% | 3 | 101.0% |
Ohio | December 16 | 115 | 122 | 149 | 116 | 134 | 153 | -12 | 91.8% | -4 | 98.2% |
North Carolina | December 21 | 170 | 159 | 177 | 170 | 160 | 173 | -1 | 99.4% | 4 | 102.3% |
Kentucky | January 26 | 119 | 105 | 136 | 119 | 98 | 122 | 7 | 107.1% | 14 | 111.5% |
West Virginia | January 30 | 118 | 173 | 168 | 117 | 135 | 155 | 38 | 127.1% | 13 | 107.5% |
Indiana | February 2 | 125 | 119 | 135 | 125 | 87 | 134 | 32 | 136.8% | 1 | 100.7% |
Pennsylvania | February 16 | 228 | 218 | 205 | 228 | 217 | 207 | 1 | 100.5% | -2 | 99.0% |
California | February 25 | 100 | 157 | 126 | 100 | 166 | 128 | -9 | 94.6% | -2 | 98.4% |
New Mexico | March 8 | 112 | 115 | 73 | 70 | 74 | 53 | 41 | 97.1% | 20 | 86.1% |
Oregon | March 8 | 76 | 77 | 65 | 76 | 79 | 73 | -2 | 97.5% | -8 | 89.0% |
Georgia | March 11 | 236 | 161 | 233 | 236 | 137 | 225 | 24 | 117.5% | 8 | 103.6% |
Idaho | March 11 | 105 | 72 | 142 | 105 | 65 | 145 | 7 | 110.8% | -3 | 97.9% |
Montana | March 14 | 125 | 138 | 153 | 125 | 150 | 150 | -12 | 92.0% | 3 | 102.0% |
Maine | March 15 | 186 | 199 | 190 | 186 | 188 | 192 | 11 | 105.9% | -2 | 99.0% |
Utah | March 17 | 90 | 64 | 94 | 89 | 86 | 130 | -22 | 73.6% | -36 | 71.5% |
Iowa | March 18 | 125 | 123 | 120 | 125 | 110 | 109 | 13 | 111.8% | 11 | 110.1% |
Nevada | March 18 | 53 | 68 | 87 | 53 | 62 | 72 | 6 | 109.7% | 15 | 120.8% |
Missouri | March 29 | 181 | 146 | 194 | 180 | 143 | 206 | 3 | 101.5% | -12 | 93.7% |
South Dakota | March 29 | 105 | 84 | 116 | 105 | 70 | 113 | 14 | 120.0% | 3 | 102.7% |
South Carolina | March 30 | 170 | 115 | 184 | 124 | 73 | 119 | 42 | 114.9% | 65 | 112.8% |
Colorado | April 4 | 83 | 88 | 91 | 83 | 72 | 90 | 16 | 122.2% | 1 | 101.1% |
Tennessee | April 7 | 115 | 97 | 148 | 117 | 78 | 145 | 19 | 126.5% | 3 | 103.8% |
North Dakota | April 11 | 70 | 65 | 75 | 72 | 55 | 69 | 10 | 121.6% | 6 | 111.8% |
Oklahoma | April 15 | 126 | 137 | 199 | 126 | 84 | 173 | 53 | 163.1% | 26 | 115.0% |
Michigan | April 19 | 110 | 207 | 201 | 148 | 261 | 257 | -54 | 106.7% | -56 | 105.2% |
Washington | May 20 | 124 | 140 | 120 | 123 | 119 | 120 | 21 | 116.7% | 0 | 99.2% |
Vermont | May 26 | 180 | 170 | 113 | 180 | 150 | 100 | 20 | 113.3% | 13 | 113.0% |
Wyoming | May 27 | 75 | 65 | 116 | 75 | 33 | 113 | 32 | 197.0% | 3 | 102.7% |
Minnesota | May 31 | 201 | 219 | 207 | 134 | 132 | 141 | 87 | 110.6% | 66 | 97.9% |
Alaska | June 1 | 50 | 44 | 64 | 54 | 51 | 58 | -7 | 93.2% | 6 | 119.2% |
Arizona | June 1 | 90 | 79 | 83 | 90 | 81 | 108 | -2 | 97.5% | -25 | 76.9% |
Kansas | June 1 | 165 | 150 | 204 | 125 | 92 | 146 | 58 | 123.5% | 58 | 105.9% |
Wisconsin | June 1 | 115 | 122 | 97 | 116 | 106 | 134 | 16 | 116.1% | -37 | 73.0% |
Connecticut | June 7 | 187 | 170 | 167 | 187 | 180 | 163 | -10 | 94.4% | 4 | 102.5% |
Hawaii | June 7 | 65 | 102 | 38 | 64 | 95 | 53 | 7 | 105.7% | -15 | 70.6% |
Massachusetts | June 7 | 200 | 233 | 68 | 200 | 231 | 112 | 2 | 100.9% | -44 | 60.7% |
New Hampshire | June 10 | 424 | 418 | 449 | 424 | 398 | 485 | 20 | 105.0% | -36 | 92.6% |
Florida | June 24 | 160 | 194 | 182 | 140 | 107 | 142 | 87 | 158.6% | 40 | 112.1% |
Rhode Island | June 29 | 113 | 150 | 48 | 113 | 134 | 38 | 16 | 111.9% | 10 | 126.3% |
Delaware | July 12 | 52 | 51 | 35 | 51 | 51 | 39 | 0 | 98.1% | -4 | 88.0% |
New York | July 14 | 213 | 246 | 168 | 213 | 237 | 161 | 9 | 103.8% | 7 | 104.3% |
See also
- State legislative elections, 2016
- Impact of term limits on state legislative elections in 2016
- State legislatures compared by extent of electoral competitiveness in 2016
Footnotes
- ↑ Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Virginia hold state legislative elections in odd-numbered years. Alabama and Maryland hold elections every four years.
- ↑ Numerically, more Democrats and Republicans ran for election in states with 2016 elections. However, there were fewer 2016 Republican candidates when adjusting for the number of seats up in those states.
- ↑ Nebraska legislative candidates are elected in nonpartisan elections and are, thus, not included in this list.
- ↑ Some variance could be attributed to which seats are up for election in each year.
|
|