CREATE. CONNECT. THRIVE. The Health and Economic Impacts of Connecting People to Nature with the East Cooper Trail
PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
PALMETTO TRAIL
CONSTRUCTING THE
EAST COOPER TRAIL
SWAMP FOX PASSAGE
Coo pe r er Riv
Ashle yR
Wando Ri v
will connect communities from downtown Charleston and Mt. Pleasant to Sullivan’s Island, Isle of Palms, Awendaw, and McClellanville, providing residents and tourists a fun and healthy way to experience the culture and nature of East Cooper. Planned for active transportation and outdoor recreation, the trail will extend a total of 82 miles, linking shopping, restaurants, and historic sites to beaches, parks, and forests. With a team of partners already hard at work implementing sections of the trail, residents of the East Cooper area are already experiencing improvements in their quality of life.
FRANCIS MARION NATIONAL FOREST
2,000 PLANT & WILDLIFE SPECIES WILL BE A BIKE RIDE AWAY 1
er nection int Con Long Po
r ive
MT. PLEASANT
ry Fer this ion Ma nnect Co
EAST COAST GREENWAY
CHARLESTON
SULLIVAN’S ISLAND BATTERY 2 BEACH
1
AWENDAW
ISLE OF PALMS
Sante eR ive r
EAST COAST GREENWAY
McCLELLANVILLE
By constructing the East Cooper Trail, the Charleston Region will gain:
2,230,000 1,392,000 MORE BIKE TRIPS PER YEAR
264,000
$
IN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS PER YEAR
MORE WALK TRIPS PER YEAR
424,000
300
MORE HOURS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PER YEAR
MORE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT JOBS
83,808,000+ $3,362,000
$
IN ECONOMIC AND TOURISM BENEFITS PER YEAR
IN TRANSPORTATION AND ACCESS BENEFITS PER YEAR
87 MILLION
$
3,393,000
$
IN ONE-TIME PROPERTY VALUE BENEFITS
OVER
IN TOTAL BENEFITS PER YEAR
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
05
INTRODUCTION
09
METHODS
BENEFITS
13
3
HEALTH + ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
17
ECONOMIC + TOURISM BENEFITS
21
TRANSPORTATION + ACCESS BENEFITS
25
OPEN SPACE EVALUATION
29
SOURCES
4
INTRODUCTION
McCLELLANVILLE
AWENDAW
10 MIN WALK MT. PLEASANT
CHARLESTON SULLIVAN’S ISLAND
5
ISLE OF PALMS
15 MIN BIKE RIDE
The fully constructed East Cooper Trail will improve the region’s access to outdoor recreation opportunities and provide new ways for residents and visitors to experience all that the East Cooper area has to offer.
6
INTRODUCTION
While the construction of the East Cooper Trail will benefit all residents of and visitors to the region, those living within three miles (about a 15 minute bike ride which includes parts of downtown Charleston and Daniel Island) and one-half mile (about a 10 minute walk) of the trail will have the most convenient access and will gain the most from the trail’s completion. To calculate these benefits, we have estimated bicycling benefits of the trail system for residents living within three miles of the trail and walking benefits for residents living within one-half mile of the trail. For the purpose of this report, East Cooper is the land area bounded by the Cooper River and Lake Moultrie to the west, the Atlantic Ocean to the east, the Santee River to the north, and Charleston Harbor to the south. All estimated values are rounded and should be considered order of magnitude estimates rather than exact amounts.
107,000
2 Who Lives TOTALNear the Trail?
16,000
POPULATION
TOTAL POPULATION EMPLOYED POPULATION
EMPLOYED POPULATION
107,000 50,000
16,000
15 MINUTE BIKE
8,000
10 MINUTE WALK
50,000
15 MINUTE BIKE
8,000
10 MINUTE WALK
What Will It Connect?
CITIES CHARLESTON
MT. PLEASANT
AWENDAW
MCCLELL ANVILLE
CITIES BEACHES
CHARLESTON SULLIVAN’S ISL AND
MT. PLEASANT
AWENDAW
MCCLELL ANVILLE
ISLE OF PALMS
BEACHES PARKS
SULLIVAN’S ISL AND SHEM CREEK PARK
ISLE OF PALMS L AUREL HILL COUNT Y PARK
FR ANCIS MARION NATIONAL FOREST
SANTEE COASTAL RESERVE
MT. PLEASANT MEMORIAL WATERFRONT PARK
PARKS
REC. AREAS
SHEM CREEK PARK
BUCK HALL RECREATION AREA
L AUREL HILL COUNT Y PARK
MT. PLEASANT/ CHARLESTON KOA
FR ANCIS MARION NATIONAL FOREST BOONE HALL PL ANTATION
SANTEE COASTAL RESERVE
FORT MOULTRIE
REC. AREAS BUCK HALL RECREATION AREA
7
MT. PLEASANT/ CHARLESTON KOA
BOONE HALL PL ANTATION
FORT MOULTRIE
MT. PLEASANT MEMORIAL WATERFRONT PARK
8
METHODS
METHODS To calculate health, environmental, economic, tourism, transportation, and access impacts, this analysis uses five-year socioeconomic and travel behavior estimates generated by the US Census Bureau and regional multipliers generated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Currently, just over 1 percent of Charleston County residents bicycle to work and 3 percent walk to work. 3 With better access to a trail system that connects popular regional destinations, the number of people bicycling and walking in Charleston County will rise to be more in-line with the most active cities in the southeast.
9
Better access to a trail system will help East Cooper be more in line with the most active cities in the southeast.
10
METHODS
How the East Cooper Trail Compares How will a fully-constructed trail network change the way residents and visitors experience East Cooper? To better understand the shift in travel behavior, we looked at transportation patterns in cities and counties similar to Charleston County but with more advanced bicycle and pedestrian networks. These geographies, known as peer locations, were selected based on proximity to Charleston County as well as similarities in their roadway networks, climates, terrains, and population make-up. Based on these criteria, Alachua County (FL), Arlington (VA), Auburn (AL), Orange County
(NC), and Monroe County (IN) were selected as peer locations to Charleston County. With the exception of Auburn, all of the peer locations (or the largest city within them) received the League of American Bicyclist’s Silver Level Bicycle Friendly Community © award designation.4 In addition, the major cities within Alachua County and Monroe County each received a Bronze Level Walk Friendly Community © award designation, and Arlington received a Gold Level designation.5 Currently, the City of Charleston is a Bronze Level Bicycle Friendly Community © but this designation does not extend to the East Cooper area.6
MONROE CO.
The designation of a locale as a Bicycle Friendly or Walk Friendly Community represents a significant investment in improving the bicycling and walking environment. Because of this, residents in the four peer locations on average are more likely to bicycle or walk compared to residents in Charleston County. Currently, only 1 percent of the Charleston County population bicycle to work compared to an average of 2 percent in the peer locations.7 And 3 percent of people in Charleston County walk to work compared to an average of 5 percent among peer locations.8
ARLINGTON
ORANGE CO.
AUBURN
CHARLESTON CO. Alachua County (FL), Arlington (VA), Auburn (AL), Orange County (NC), and Monroe County (IN) were selected as peer locations
ALACHUA CO.
11
0.73%
WALK AND BICYCLE COMMUTE MODE SHARE 9 6
5.5% WALK
5
BICYCLE
3.8%
PERCENT
4
3.0%
3
2.1% 2
1.1%
1.4%
1
0 PEER LOCATIONS
50 LARGEST US CITIES
How the Impacts are Calculated
Limitations of the Analysis
A series of over 50 factors developed from various studies around the U.S. and peerreviewed journal articles were used to convert the estimated number of new bicycle and walking trips that will result from the construction of the East Cooper Trail into dollar figures.
The primary purpose of the analysis is to create a clearer, fuller picture of how the East Cooper Trail will improve the quality of life of East Cooper residents. The estimated impacts reflect the benefits that may be experienced with the full construction of the 82 mile trail, and although the construction of the trail may take place through the completion of individual segments over time, the benefits cannot necessarily be assumed to be proportionally divided among those segments.
CHARLESTON COUNTY
12
HEALTH + ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
HEALTH + ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS The health and wellness of East Cooper residents and the health of our environment are tightly linked. We know that health conditions caused, in part, by a lack of physical activity are a fast growing problem in the United States, and Charleston County is no exception.10 We also know that air pollution can intensify existing health conditions and contribute to severe health problems in children and pregnant women.11 The Environmental Protection Agency placed Charleston County in the bottom 10 percent of counties in the country for carcinogenic air releases and the bottom 20 percent for all environmental releases.12 These high levels of toxic material helped earn the state of South Carolina a spot on the National Resource Defense Council’s “Toxic 20 list”, and contribute to the broader picture of negative health outcomes among residents.13
13
Constructing a well-designed, connected trail system across East Cooper will encourage a shift from energy-intensive modes of transportation such as cars and trucks to active modes of transportation such as bicycling and walking. While many of the active living-related benefits of a trail network can be difficult to quantify – such as improved mental health, educational growth, connection to nature, and sense of place – a growing body of literature links parks and trails to increased physical activity, decreased healthcare costs, and improved air quality.14, 15 The completed East Cooper Trail will dramatically shape the ability of residents in Charleston County to get out and live more active, healthier lifestyles. It will help to generate over 3.6 million more bicycling and walking trips, remove over 4.8 million pounds of pollutants from the atmosphere, and spur over 424,000 new hours
of physical activity. This boost to wellness will save over $176,000 in healthcare-related costs per year. In addition, studies show that increased physical activity helps seniors stay mentally fit,16 reduces the risk of coronary heart disease, and even decreases the amount of insulin needed by people with Type I diabetes.17 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified the Type II diabetes rate in Charleston County as one of the highest in the country and listed South Carolina as one of 15 states in the U.S.’s “diabetes belt.”18 In 2012, there were over 10,000 emergency room visits for diabetes across the county, among which almost 75 percent were by African-American patients.19 When combined with a healthy diet, increased physical activity has been shown to reverse the course of Type II diabetes.20
You’re only one bike ride away from a good mood.
14
When the East C Charleston Count
WHY IT MATTERS
21%
OF PEOPLE IN CHARLESTON COUNTY HAVE NOT EXERCISED IN THE LAST MONTH 21
46TH
26% OF THE ADULT POPULATION IN CHARLESTON COUNTY IS OBESE 22
SOUTH CAROLINA RANKS
46 / 50
STATES
FOR CORE DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH 23
166 MILLION
$
DIABETES COSTS CHARLESTON COUNTY
PER YEAR
24
That’s enough to cover all planned public school and library renovations!
14%
OF ADULTS IN CHARLESTON COUNTY DID NOT SEE A DOCTOR DUE TO COST 25
15
81% MORE PEOPLE MEETING THE CDC RECOMMENDED HOURS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY (~ 30 minutes/day)
HEALTH + ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
Cooper Trail is constructed, nty will gain:
3,050,000 MILES BIKED PER YEAR
361,000 MILES WALKED PER YEAR
176,000
$
ANNUAL HEALTHCARE COST SAVINGS
88,000
$
That’s the equivalent of 6 round trips to the moon
That’s the equivalent of 1,300 trips across South Carolina
the equivalent of 3,500 hours with a personal trainer (at ~ $50/hour)
SAVINGS FROM REDUCED VEHICLE EMISSIONS PER YEAR
16
ECONOMIC + TOURISM BENEFITS
ECONOMIC + TOURISM BENEFITS Creating a major recreational resource like the East Cooper Trail that provides access to local parks, historic and cultural destinations, beaches, and a national forest not only contributes to a sense of place for local residents but also attracts tourists to East Cooper. With more than 12 percent of people within Charleston County employed in the leisure and hospitality industry (excluding the agricultural industry due to seasonal fluctuations), 26 tourism makes up a critical component of the area’s economy. While it is difficult to accurately forecast the change in tourism spending resulting from the construction of the trail
17
system, an analysis of the U.S.’s Bureau of Economic Analysis RIMS II multipliers shows that the region can anticipate an $83 million increase in tourism spending per year. The same amenities that will draw tourists to the area also appeal to residents looking to buy new homes or open new businesses. Property value studies of similar trail systems show that nearby property owners can expect a minimum increase of 4 percent in the value of their properties after the East Cooper Trail is completed, 27, 28, 29 with a collective property value increase of nearly $3.4 million for homes and businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail.
“Bicycles are the indicator species of a community, like shellfish in a bay.” - P. MARTIN SCOTT
18
WHY IT MATTERS
When the East C Charleston Count
A RECENT STUDY FOUND THAT THE CITY OF CHARLESTON HAS
LESS TOURISM INFRASTRUCTURE THAN SIMILAR CITIES, PUTTING PRESSURE ON THE HISTORIC DISTRICT AND CREATING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INCREASED EAST COOPER TOURISM 32
VISITORS TO CHARLESTON COUNTY ON AVERAGE SPENT
889
$
PER ADULT PER TRIP
31
12% OVER
OF REGIONAL SALES CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO TOURISM 33
CHARLESTON COUNTY WELCOMED AN ESTIMATED
4.9 MILLION VISITORS IN 2014
26%
19
30
OF CHILDREN IN CHARLESTON COUNTY LIVE IN POVERTY 34
300
MORE JOBS
SUPPORTED BY THE EXPECTED INCREASE IN TOURISM SPENDING (permanent and temporary)
ECONOMIC + TOURISM BENEFITS
Cooper Trail is constructed, nty will gain:
144,000 MORE VISITORS PER YEAR
83,808,000
$
MORE TOURISM SPENDING PER YEAR
30,454,000
$
TOTAL IMPACT ON EARNINGS PER YEAR (excluding retail sales)
3,393,000
$
IN ONE-TIME PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH
20
TRANSPORT + ACCESS BENEFITS
TRANSPORT + ACCESS BENEFITS The fatality rate on South Carolina’s roads is tied for the highest in the nation. 35 Charleston County has one of the highest traffic-related death rates among all South Carolina counties. 36 Between January and August of 2015, the County experienced five bike and pedestrian traffic fatalities, according to Accident Data Center. 37 These collisions and fatalities disproportionately affect low-income populations. An analysis of 22,000 collisions in America found that pedestrian fatality rates in lowincome portions of metro areas are approximately twice that of more affluent neighborhoods. 38 Fortunately, one study showed that a pedestrian’s risk of being in a collision declines 34 percent if walking and bicycling double
21
in their community. 39 Additionally, American cities with higher per capita bicycling rates tend to have much lower traffic fatality rates for all road users than other cities, and per capita collisions between people driving, walking, and bicycling decline as walking and bicycling increases.40 The construction of the East Cooper Trail will make walking and bicycling in East Cooper easy and fun, which in turn will help reduce the overall number of pedestrian and bicyclist injuries and deaths. In total, East Cooper residents are estimated to save $1,303,000 per year in collision-related costs with completion of the trail. The demand for trails is high in Charleston County. Walking is the preferred outdoor recreation
and leisure time activity in the region during fall or winter months (walking for pleasure or exercise remains the activity in which the largest percentage of people participate), but 37% of South Carolinians and 32% of Charleston County residents feel they do not have enough access to outdoor recreation or leisure time facilities and activities.41 With the construction of the East Cooper Trail, it is estimated that there will be over 3.4 million more miles biked or walked and 2.6 million fewer miles driven in a car each year. This is estimated to save residents a total of over $2 million in congestion, roadway maintenance, and household vehicle operation costs per year.
“...as development continues, more and more people are demanding safer conditions to walk and ride. A city is only as good as its ability to keep walkers and riders safe, and we deserve to live in a good city.” - PETER WILBORN, LOCAL ATTORNEY AND BICYCLE ADVOCATE 42
22
When the East C Charleston Count
WHY IT MATTERS
18% OF CHARLESTON COUNTY RESIDENTS DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE ACCESS TO EXERCISE OPPORTUNITIES
8,220
308
$
$
AVERAGE COST OF OPERATING A CAR PER YEAR 44
AVERAGE COST OF OPERATING A BIKE PER YEAR 45
CHARLESTON COUNTY HAS ONE OF THE
HIGHEST TRAFFIC-RELATED DEATH RATES IN SOUTH CAROLINA
43
DRIVING ON CONGESTED, DETERIORATED, OR UNSAFE ROADS COSTS EACH CHARLESTON COUNTY DRIVER
1,168
$
23
PER YEAR
47
46
182,000
$
IN REDUCED CONGESTION-RELATED COSTS PER YEAR
TRANSPORT + ACCESS BENEFITS
Cooper Trail is constructed, nty will gain:
2,608,000 FEWER MILES TRAVELLED BY AUTOMOBILES PER YEAR
1,486,000
$
IN REDUCED HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE OPERATION COSTS PER YEAR
1,303,000
$
IN REDUCED COLLISION-RELATED COSTS PER YEAR
24
OPEN SPACE EVALUATION
OPEN SPACE EVALUATION The U.S. Census Bureau cited Mt. Pleasant as one of the fastest growing municipalities in the country.48 This rapid growth welcomes new residents and development, and also increases the need for open space. The East Cooper Land Trust’s inventory of designed parkland (e.g., playgrounds, neighborhood parks, sports fields, and golf courses) and natural open space (e.g., wetlands, forests, and deserts) within Mt. Pleasant provides an important starting point for discussing open space needs in the East Cooper area.
25
“Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in, where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.” - JOHN MUIR, NATURALIST AND AUTHOR 49
26
OPEN SPACE EVALUATION
OPEN SPACE 3,841 ACRES
10%
NON-OPEN SPACE 33,091 ACRES
EXISTING MT. PLEASANT OPEN SPACE Open Space in Mt. Pleasant In 2006, Charleston County adopted a Comprehensive Greenbelt Plan that established a goal of 30 percent open space.50 Currently just over 10 percent of land area in the Town of Mt. Pleasant is designed parkland or natural open space, totaling 3,837 acres (the entire East Cooper area was not included due to the large influence of Francis Marion National Forest). To be in line with the County’s 30 percent goal, Mt. Pleasant will need 11,080 total acres of open space.
30
%
NON-OPEN SPACE 25,852 ACRES
CHARLESTON COUNTY OPEN SPACE GOAL
7,243
MT. PLEASANT NEEDS
ADDITIONAL ACRES OF OPEN SPACE TO BE IN LINE WITH THE COUNTY’S GOAL
27
OPEN SPACE 11,080 ACRES
ACRES
Types of Existing Open Space in Mt. Pleasant
253 2,107 PUBLIC ACTIVE RECREATION
23
SITES
1,479 PUBLIC PASSIVE PARKLAND
14
PERMANENTLY PROTECTED
17
SITES
All of these sites contain built recreational facilities with public access for active use by Mt. Pleasant residents.
All of these sites have public access and contain predominantly natural open space, but are not permanently protected. Small neighborhood parks located within gated communities are not included.
Public Facilities per Residents
PUBLIC FACILITY
SITES
These sites are forever protected under conservation easement held by land trusts and other conservation entities. Eight of the sites allow public access.
NUMBER IN MT. PLEASANT
FACILITY / NUMBER OF RESIDENTS SERVED
Playgrounds
11
1 per 7,072
Ball Parks
19
1 per 4,094
Tennis Courts
27
1 per 2,881
Multi-Purpose Fields
34
1 per 2,288
Off-Leash Dog Parks
2
1 per 38,898
Skateboard Parks
1
1 per 77,796
28
SOURCES 1 2
“Plants and Wildlife on the Francis Marion National Forest.” Accessed Sep. 11, 2015.<goo.gl/aFKsPO> 2009-2013 American Community Survey. US Census Bureau.
26 “Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, South Carolina.” (2011). “U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. <http://www.huduser.org/publications/pdf/Charleston_Comp.pdf>
4
“Current Bicycle Friendly Communities.” (2014). The League of American Bicyclists. <http://bikeleague.org/sites/default/files/BFC_ MasterList_2014.pdf>
27 Racca, D. and A. Dhanju. “Property Value/Desirability Effects of Bike Paths Adjacent to Residential Areas.” (2006). Delaware Center for Transportation, The State of Delaware Department of Transportation. <https://www.railstotrails.org/resourcehandler. ashx?id=4482>
5
“Full List of Walk Friendly Communities.” (2015). U.S. Department of Transportation (FHWA), UNC Highway Safety Research Center, and FedEx. <http://www.walkfriendly.org/communities/list.cfm>
28 Webel, S. “Trail Effects on Neighborhoods: Home Value, Safety, Quality of Life.” National Trails Training Partnership. <http://www. americantrails.org/resources/adjacent/sumadjacent.html>
6
“Current Bicycle Friendly Communities.” (2014). The League of American Bicyclists. <http://bikeleague.org/sites/default/files/BFC_ MasterList_2014.pdf>
29 “Economic Values of Greenways, Trails, and River Protection.” National Trails Training Partnership. <http://www.americantrails.org/ resources/economics/NPSeconStudy.html>
7
2009-2013 American Community Survey. US Census Bureau.
30 “Office of Tourism Analysis Annual Report.” (2014-2015). College of Charleston. <http://sb.cofc.edu/centers/tourismanalysis/news/ Office%20of%20Tourism%20Analysis%20Annual%20Report%20 -%202014-2015.pdf
3 Ibid.
8 Ibid. 9 Ibid. 10 “Physical Activity in South Carolina.” (1999). South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. <http://www.sph.sc.edu/prevent/pareport/BROCH.PDF> 11
Poursafa, P. and Dr. R. Kelishadi. “What health professionals should know about the health effects of air pollution and climate change on children and pregnant mothers.” (2011) Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 16(3): 257-264.
31 Ibid. 32 Ibid. 33 Ibid. 34 “Selected Kids Count Indicators for Charleston County, South Carolina.” (2013). Kids Count Data Center. <http://www.datacenter. kidscount.org/data/customreports/6317/any>
12 “2002 Rankings: Major Chemical Releases or Waste Generation in Charleston County.” (2002). Scorecard. <http://scorecard.goodguide. com/env-releases/county.tcl?fips_county_code=45019>
35 “South Carolina Transportation by the Numbers.” (2015). TRIP. <http://www.tripnet.org/docs/SC_Transportation_by_the_Numbers_ TRIP_Report_Jan_2015.pdf>
13 ”Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania Have Worst Toxic Air Pollution from Power Plants.” (2012). Natural Resources Defense Council. <http://www.nrdc.org/media/2012/120809.asp>
36 “2010 South Carolina Injury County Profile.” (2010). South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. <https://www.scdhec.gov/library/CR-010454.pdf>
14 “Benefits of Greenways: A Pennsylvania Study.” (2002). Pennsylvania Greenways Partnership Commission. <http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/BenefitsPA2002.pdf>
37 “Complete Charleston County, SC accident report and news.” (2015). Accident Data Center. <http://accidentdatacenter.com/us/ south-carolina/charleston-sc/charleston-county-sc>
15 “The Environmental Benefits of Bicycling and Walking.” (1993). Federal Highway Administration. <http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/case15.pdf>
38 “Pedestrians Dying at Disproportionate Rates in America’s Poorer Neighborhoods.” (2014). Governing. <http://www.governing.com/ topics/public-justice-safety/gov-pedestrian-deaths-analysis.html>
16 Yaffe, K., et al. “More Physical Activity Leads to Less Cognitive Decline.” (2001). Archives of Internal Medicine. <http://www.americantrails.org/resources/benefits/VAcognitive.html>
39 Litman, T. “Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs.” (2015). Victoria Transport Policy Institute. <http://www.vtpi.org/tranben.pdf>
17 “A Step in the Right Direction.” American Hiking Society. <http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/AHShealthben.pdf>
41 “South Carolina Recreation Participation and Preference Study.” (2005). South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. <https://www.scprt.com/files/RPE/2005%20Rec%20Study. pdf>
18 Hendrick, B. “Southern States Make Up Much of ‘Diabetes Belt’.” (2011). WebMD Health News. <http://www.webmd.com/diabetes/ news/20110307/southern-states-make-up-much-of-diabetes-belt> 19 “Diabetes in Charleston County.” (2012). South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. <https://www.scdhec.gov/Health/docs/Epi/diabetes/Charleston.pdf> 20 “A Step in the Right Direction.” American Hiking Society. <http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/AHShealthben.pdf> 21 “County Health Rankings & Roadmaps.” (2015). University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. <http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/southcarolina/2015/rankings/charleston/county/outcomes/overall/ snapshot> 22 Ibid. 23 “All Determinants.” (2014). America’s Health Rankings. <http://www.americashealthrankings.org/ALL/Determinants> 24 “Charleston County, South Carolina.” (2015). County Health Calculator. <http://countyhealthcalculator.org/location/145019/#64> 25 “Cost Barrier to Care.” (2015). U.S. Department for Health and Human Services. <http://wwwn.cdc.gov/CommunityHealth/profile/ currentprofile/SC/Charleston/10019>
40 Ibid.
42 Quick, D. “Winter’s bike, pedestrian fatalities underscore importance of infrastructure, safety and awareness.” (2015). The Post and Courier. <goo.gl/veyFKA> 43 “2015 County Health Rankings.” (2015). County Health Rankings & Roadmaps. <http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/sites/default/files/ state/downloads/CHR2015_SC_0.pdf> 44 Mohn, T. “Pedaling to Prosperity: Biking Saves U.S. Riders Billions a Year.” (2012). Forbes. <goo.gl/YX2r1R> 45 Ibid. 46 “Motor Vehicle Deaths.” (2015). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. <http://wwwn.cdc.gov/CommunityHealth/profile/ currentprofile/SC/Charleston/1076> 47 Wren, D. “Road woes: Growing congestion threatens to choke Charleston port traffic, commerce.” (2015). The Post and Courier. <goo.gl/dfwXoK> 48 Cohen, T. “Population Trends in Incorporated Places: 2000 to 2013.” (2015). U.S. Census Bureau. <https://www.census.gov/content/dam/ Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1142.pdf> 49 Muir, J. “Yosemite.” (1912). 50 “Comprehensive Greenbelt Plan.” (2006). Charleston County Greenbelt Program. <http://charlestoncountygreenbelt.org/cgp.php>
29
30
THIS STUDY FUNDED BY:
OTHER PARTNERS FOR THE EAST COOPER TRAIL INCLUDE:
SEPTEMBER 16, 2015