Bartlett Design Research Folios
Níall McLaughlin Architects Oxford Projects
BARTLETT DESIGN RESEARCH FOLIOS
Níall McLaughlin Architects Oxford Projects
CONTENTS
1 (previous) View of the Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre. 2 View looking up one of the stair towers of the ROQ East and West Buildings.
5
Project Details
6
Statement about the Research Content and Process
8
Introduction
14
Aims and Objectives
17
Questions
17
Context
18
Methodology
20
Dissemination
62
Project Highlights
63
Bibliography
65
Related Publications
66
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Project Details Author
Níall McLaughlin
Title
Oxford Projects
Output Type
Building and urban design
Projects and Completion Dates
Radcliffe Primary Care Building (completed 2016) Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre (completed 2017) Catherine Hughes Building (completed 2019) Master’s Field Project (ongoing; phase 1 completed 2019) North Oxford Development Project (ongoing) Oxford India Centre (ongoing) Radcliffe Observatory Quarter Masterplan (ongoing)
Clients / Oxford University Estates Directorate (OUED) for Commissioning Bodies Radcliffe Primary Care Building Worcester College for Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre Somerville College for Catherine Hughes Building Balliol College for Master’s Field Project University College Oxford for North Oxford Development Project Somerville College for Oxford India Centre Collaboration with Statutory Bodies
University of Oxford Conservation Officer, OUED
Practice Team Benni Allan, Penelopi Antoniou, Eimear Arthur, Simon Bishop, Alastair Browning, Joanne Chen, Yangyang Chen, Alastair Clarke, Alastair Crockett, Bev Dockray, Emily Doll, Harriet Duetz, Alis Fadzil, Adelina Fasan, James Foskett, Holly Galbraith, Abigail Giddings, Tilo Guenther, Katherine Hagab, Tamsin Hanke, Joanna Karatzas, Alicia Lafita, Caoilinn McConville, Tom McGlynn, Rasmus Pikk, Susanne Sherif, Ioana Vierita, Kerry Watton
6
PROJECT DETAILS
Acoustic Engineers
Gillieron Scott Acoustic Design, Cole Jarman, Max Fordham
Approved Building Inspectors
Aedis Group
Arboriculturalist
Sylba Consultancy
CDM Advisors
Bureau Veritas UK
Contractors
BAM, Beard Construction
Decorative Mouldings
Fine Art Mouldings
Fire Consultants
JGA Fire Engineering
Ecologist
GS Ecology
Furniture Design
Benchmark, David Colwell Design
Heritage
Asset Heritage Consulting, Barton Willmore
Hydrological Design
Wallingford HydroSolutions
Joinery
Barn 6 Furniture
Landscape Architects
Dominic Cole, Kim Wilkie, Simon Bagnall, Townshend Landscape Architects, Urban Design Studio
Planning
Kemp & Kemp, Barton Willmore
Project Managers
Bidwells, PDCM
Quantity Surveyors
Castle Hayes Pursey (CHP), Gardiner & Theobald, Gleeds, McBains
Services Engineers Ridge, Silcock Harley Haddow
Dawson & Partners, King Shaw Associates, Max Fordham,
Stonework
Szerelmey
Structural Engineers
AKSWard, Pell Frischmann, Price & Myers, Smith and Wallwork
Transport
Paul Basham Associates
7
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Statement about the Research Content and Process Description
3. Refining architectural details and ideas, building on the experience and knowledge of previous projects in the same environment;
Through a decade-long series of building and planning commissions, Níall McLaughlin Architects (NMLA) developed a researchbased, integrated and anticipatory way of building within Oxford’s historic environment and architectural heritage.
4. Engaging in a sustained and propositional way with communal committee structures, the University of Oxford colleges and the OUED;
Questions
5. Advancing knowledge through interdisciplinary discussion within UCL and institutions in the UK and abroad;
1. How do sustained architectural interventions in regulated environments foster connections?
6. Deploying a range of design-led research methods using drawing, making and prototyping.
2. How can new buildings be integrated into a historic environment? 3. How can existing regulations be utilised to critique proposed masterplans?
Dissemination
The projects have been individually or collectively presented in 18 invited talks and keynote addresses in the UK, Norway, Germany, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, India and the US. They have also been reviewed extensively, in print and online. The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre was exhibited at the 16th International Architecture Exhibition, La Biennale di Venezia (2018).
4. How can earlier projects inform new work?
Methodology
1. Surveying and analysing the spatial structure of Oxford’s architectural and urban fabric; 2. Conducting visual and text-based research on the history of Oxford’s architectural traditions, from the Gothic to the modern;
8
STATEMENT ABOUT THE RESEARCH CONTENT AND PROCESS
Project Highlights
proposition, and vice versa. These strategies were formulated in two research studies: The Tradition of Modern Architecture in Oxford (2010), which investigates architectural typologies, highlighting the link between modern architecture, the ‘monastic’ Oxford college and the free-standing European university faculty building (3); and the Walton Street Wall Strategy Document (2011), which examines the aesthetic, communal, evidential and historical value of the Walton Street wall and, more specifically, the development of the spatial type of the college as a confined urban form (4). These studies examine and compare historical maps and other visual documents, and utilise drawing and photography as analytical tools. Their findings were critical in the development of later projects.
The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre won the Oxford Preservation Trust Award (2017), three RIBA Awards – National, Regional and South Building of the Year (all 2018), and a Wood Award (2018). It was shortlisted for the RIBA Stirling Prize (2018). The projects have led to work for NMLA in Cambridge – Jesus College, Magdalene College, Trinity Hall and Peterhouse – and advisory roles in architectural competitions in Oxford.
Statement of Inclusion of Earlier Work
NMLA’s work in Oxford dates back to the Radcliffe Observatory Quarter (ROQ) East and West Buildings, completed in 2010. Various projects were subsequently undertaken between then and 2014: the Wolfson Building extension and refurbishment for Somerville College (completed 2011); a Detailed Feasibility Study for the Department of Statistics (2011); Parks Hospital Medical Research Campus Masterplan for the University of Oxford Estates Department (2012–4); and a Detailed Feasibility Study for Modern Art Oxford, Department of Art History, Ruskin School of Art (2013). Frequent reference is made throughout this document to the ROQ East and West Buildings on the grounds that they were fundamental in establishing the larger research project: the decade-long series of projects that were undertaken in their wake enabled NMLA to further develop and refine a reciprocal strategy of building in Oxford, where the existing urban fabric and the history of the city become part of the architectural
9
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
S SE
10
STATEMENT ABOUT THE RESEARCH CONTENT AND PROCESS
STATEMENT ABOUT THE REEARCH CONTENT AND PROCESS
3 Comparative reading of the ‘monastic’ type of college and faculty buildings from NMLA’s study The Tradition of Modern Architecture in Oxford.
11
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
12
STATEMENT ABOUT THE RESEARCH CONTENT AND PROCESS
4 Typological study of building sections from the Walton Street Wall Strategy Document.
13
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Introduction
potential of existing architectural and urban formations (8). NMLA developed an anticipatory approach for integrating specific architectural interventions within Oxford’s historic environment, focusing on a succession of major and minor moments that advance place-making by incorporating adaptable points into the fabric of existing buildings to make connections to structures in the future. By editing, deleting and adding architectural features, NMLA create a deep sense of urban ‘grain’ and demonstrate focused change to listing regulations and planning predictions. This approach works across scales and disciplines, from architecture to urban planning. NMLA’s attention to ordinary details enhances specific locations and extends further to large-scale changes in the field of planning and quality control. Beyond the individual award-winning qualities of their buildings, NMLA exemplify best practice for a specific historic urban environment in the long term. Ultimately, their coherent architectural spaces and well-defined urban clusters aid orientation, reduce enervating distraction and encourage identification within the city.
When NMLA were commissioned to design and realise the Radcliffe Observatory Quarter East and West Buildings, they did not expect that a decade later they would still be involved in multiple projects across Oxford. This first project started from an architectural competition win, jointly commissioned by the University and Somerville College. The design for the student accommodation buildings was to be realised in conjunction with Rafael Viñoly’s 2006 design of a masterplan – a large scale redevelopment of the Radcliffe Infirmary site in the centre of Oxford – which introduced a Beaux Arts composition with grand axes between and across existing buildings (5–7). McLaughlin has a unique knowledge of Oxford’s historic environment due to his long-term engagement with the city. He knows of buildings that have not materialised and also specific architectural details and urban qualities that remain latent in each project. This resulted in his appointment as ‘Keeper of the ROQ Masterplan’ after Viñoly’s resignation. This role includes coordinating the different architects commissioned for the individual faculty buildings and ensuring that, as a whole, the new quarter is a workable and positive contribution to the fabric of the city. McLaughlin’s design approach builds on not only each project but the city too, and differs from established practices of architectural heritage and conservation. Together, the Oxford Projects define architecture as something that guides us through the deep structure of a city and its multilayered history. The modern architectural interventions in Oxford’s dense fabric do not seek to unsettle the overall image of the city – characterised by its colleges and medieval urban structure – rather, they subtly reinforce, complete or foreground the latent
5 Aerial view of the vacant ROQ site after demolition of the Radcliffe Infirmary. 6 Aerial view of Somerville College after the completion of the ROQ East and West Buildings (left). The buildings that were expected to be erected across the street have not materialised.
14
INTRODUCTION
5
6
15
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
7
16
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES / QUESTIONS
Aims and Objectives
Questions
1. Connect new and old buildings, reinforcing ties between various disconnected spaces;
1. How do sustained architectural interventions in regulated historic environments foster personal and historic connections, promote sociability and a sense of identifying and belonging?
2. Realise specific buildings as well as an overarching design strategy for the historic environment of Oxford;
2. How can new buildings be integrated into a historic environment yet also provide a sense of cohesion? What methods can be employed that predict future buildings to ensure this cohesion is continued?
3. Engage with the challenges of designing within the historic depth of a city and its existing regulatory frameworks and masterplans, and respond with a research-led approach, whereby ‘erecting a building’ and ‘building the city’ become one and the same intertwined process;
3. How can existing regulations and the architectural and urban qualities they aim to preserve be utilised to critique proposed masterplans? How can they be challenged or reinforced by current historical research and architectural practice?
4. Reinterpret and reframe regulated architectural heritage through a series of individual interventions to enrich the urban grain of newly developed areas;
4. How can earlier Oxford projects be revisited to inform the direction of current projects?
5. Produce coherent spaces and a set of curated connections that host surprises of urban encounter and episodic spatial transition; 6. Facilitate navigation and reduce distraction, foregrounding centres of attention within the perceptual horizon of the city towards which broader architectural compositions gravitate.
7 Key plan depicting successive projects designed for Oxford University over the past decade:
1. Somerville College (completed 2011) 2. Wolfson Building (completed 2012) 3. Radcliffe Primary Care Building (completed 2016) 4. Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre (completed 2017) 5. Catherine Hughes Building (completed 2019)
6. Master’s Field Project (ongoing; phase 1 completed 2019) 7. North Oxford Development Project (ongoing) 8. Oxford India Centre (ongoing) 9. Radcliffe Observatory Quarter Masterplan (ongoing)
17
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Context Research for the Oxford Projects stems from a wider interest in architecture’s relationship with its multifarious contexts: historical, spatial, urban, architectural, social and political. Whilst this interest in context has its own long history in twentieth-century architecture, McLaughlin attempts to develop it further for the twenty-first century. From the late 1950s onwards, Western European and North American architects have developed contextual approaches – from the Italian Neorationalists to the peripheral Critical Regionalists of the late twentieth century – to relate new projects to the multilayered past of an existing site, which in turn shapes the form of a single building. McLaughlin engages with a site and its context in a way that extends beyond the single building to the experience of the city around it. Often, specific design features of his projects are not architecturally functional but serve to change the perception of the city. Whilst Sir Nikolaus Pevsner’s original conception of the Picturesque in architecture and urbanism already touched on such issues, his theoretical insights have rarely been translated into specific design projects. Pevsner argued that the great contribution of medieval English urban design and planning was that it was not based on a prescriptive set of abstract principles, but on a series of specific case studies. His local, emotive and environmentally aware approach emphasised the visual aspect of planning decisions, especially how harmonious urban environments are experienced by people on the street (Pevsner 2010). NMLA closely researched and used Pevsner’s theory to inform the ROQ East to West Link, which was the catalyst for NMLA’s long-term engagement with Oxford.
18
CONTEXT
8
8 Site-plan sketch showing the new Catherine Hughes Building (right), establishing the urban rhythm of A-B-C-D-C-B-A, alongside the existing Wolfson Building (centre) by architect Philip Dowson.
19
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Methodology
5. Introducing a full range of design-led research methods, including drawing, making and prototyping, which aimed to develop a design strategy for the broader site, focusing on the experience from the street rather than the stand-alone building;
The research processes developed for the project include: 1. Collecting information, visiting, surveying and analysing the architectural typologies, spatial structure and rhythms of the historic urban fabric in Oxford, using free-hand sketching, orthographic drawing and photography to record findings;
6. Refining architectural details and ideas, building on the experience and knowledge gained from previous projects in the same environment.
2. Undertaking visual and text-based research to examine the history of the making and regulated preservation of architectural traditions in Oxford, from the Gothic to the modern; 3. Consulting with the Oxford Colleges and OUED on campus development, design strategy and masterplanning, including proposing innovative educational models and changes to the brief. An involved engagement with communal committee structures and broad-based consultation meetings to persuade various constitutions influenced the building and planning processes. This owes much to the democratic structure of the colleges that is specific to Oxford and Cambridge; 4. Advancing and sharing knowledge through informal discussion, seminars and invited talks within UCL and other institutions in the UK and abroad during the research and design development of the projects; 9 View of the stair tower from the quad at Somerville College. 10 (overleaf) External view of the completed ROQ East and West Buildings.
20
METHODOLOGY
9
21
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
ROQ East and West Buildings
In 2017, NMLA developed a detailed survey of the elevation of their first Oxford project, the ROQ East and West Buildings completed in 2010, studying them as part of the historic urban fabric and how they had weathered over time (11). Bookended by staircases that operate as ‘lanterns’ (10), these buildings establish and capture an urban rhythm through their architectural form, and were originally conceived as one side of a long narrow street. In their designs, NMLA anticipated the opposite side of the street being built and also the eventual reintegration of ROQ East and West within the building stock of the older college; however, the opposite side of the street had still not been built in 2017. The external weathering conditions for the oak windows were, therefore, dramatically different to that which was predicted and instead remained exposed to sun, wind and driven rain, which had resulted in unexpected weathering patterns. As a result, NMLA worked with the college’s buildings team to subtly alter details to ensure better long-term durability. The outcome of the survey has also been incorporated into NMLA’s timber weathering database and has informed subsequent projects, such as Jesus College, University of Cambridge. The study was presented as part of a seminar on buildings that age well to the Oxford City Council Planning and Conservation Team.
11 Weathering study, ROQ East and West Buildings.
24
METHODOLOGY
11
25
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
As a result of their prolonged engagement with Oxford, NMLA coordinated and designed the ROQ Framework Document (2011) for planning with uncertainty in mind (14–5). This is an underlying planning document that combines architectural and urban guidance to ensure that the intended qualities of the public realm would be retained in any new developments. Stakeholders can refer to it to inform future architectural competitions in a detailed and site-specific way.
12
12 One of the practice’s first drawings for the ROQ site – a figure/ground diagram that reveals the urban stock and its underlying order – looking at how it develops in relation to street level.
13 Key views and termination points of the ROQ site.
26
METHODOLOGY
13
27
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
14
Views of the Observatory Existing buildings 2 storeys 3 storeys 14 Sketch illustrating indicative building heights, ROQ Framework Document.
4 storeys 5 storeys
28
METHODOLOGY
15
15 Sketch with proposed gathering spaces highlighted, ROQ Framework Document.
29
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Extensive and iterative drawing, model making and prototyping inform NMLA’s design process. Pevsner’s observations, especially his emphasis on the episodic structure, were translated into analytical drawings that followed the specificities of the ROQ site using long sight lines, visual connections between public and private spaces, turning points and other attractors of interest along the urban fabric. For the same purpose, long street models of the site were made. By lifting up models and looking obliquely from below, NMLA attempt to better understand street views (16–7).
16
17
16 Model of the ‘East to West Route’ in the ROQ masterplan. The East and West Buildings are not designed to stand alone but are site-specific, integrated parts of their broader urban realm.
17 Overview of the ROQ masterplan.
30
METHODOLOGY
Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre
The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre, completed in 2017, houses a lecture theatre, student learning space, seminar rooms and a dance studio. The project is not simply the provision of new facilities but is also the development and enhancement of the listed parkland setting. The building has been designed as a theatre in a garden and is raised on a podium. A curved-stone auditorium opens directly onto an oak-ceilinged foyer that extends out to pergolas and terraces overlooking a cricket pitch (28). The theatre is framed by a high stone screen that rises to allow clerestory light into the space and is surmounted by a pleated ceiling sweeping down to the stage (18–9). It can operate either as a fully enclosed, darkened environment or as a bright day-lit space surrounded by garden on all sides (29).
18
31
18–9 Paper model of the pleated roof for the Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
19
32
METHODOLOGY
20
20 Ground floor plan, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
33
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
21
21 Location plan, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
34
METHODOLOGY
22
22 Site plan, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
35
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
36
METHODOLOGY
23
23 Section A-A, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
37
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
38
METHODOLOGY
24
24 Section B-B, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
39
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
25 Detailed section of seminar room, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
25
40
a Ground beam b Masonry (with openings up to flood level) c Pre-cast concrete plank with concrete topping d Rigid insulation e Trench heater f Timber floor boards on support and batten system g Glazed balustrade h Clipsham Stone fin (in elevation) i Oak joist j Oak-faced plywood soffit k Clipsham Stone soffit l Sliding glazing with integral drainage m Roller blind n Oak framing to glazing o Aluminium capping
METHODOLOGY
26 Detailed section of auditorium, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre. a Ground beam b Masonry (with openings up to flood level) c Pre-cast concrete plank with concrete topping d Rigid insulation e Screed f Floor tiling g Acoustic doorset h Clipsham Stone fin (in elevation) i Oak joist j Oak-faced plywood soffit k Clipsham Stone soffit l Glazing m Roller blind n GRG ceiling o Aluminium capping
26
41
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
42
METHODOLOGY
27 Paper model, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre. 28 (overleaf) View of the Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre from across the cricket pitch.
43
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
48
METHODOLOGY
29 (previous) Theatre with pleated ceiling, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
30
49
30 Dance studio, Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre.
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Master’s Field Project
The generation of social spaces is a central concern in the Oxford Projects. For example, windows, bedrooms, toilets, kitchens and stairs aggregate together along the main corridors in student accommodation buildings to create more sociable spaces. Interspersed throughout, these spaces of connection facilitate accidental encounters as occupants walk to their rooms. Perceiving social gatherings as being at the centre of collegiate living, NMLA arranged the Master’s Field study bedrooms in clusters around a central social space. As one of the primary spatial intentions of the scheme, this principle informs the arrangement of rooms, then buildings, then ensembles of blocks around the landscape quadrangles (31–8).
31 Competition site-plan sketch, Master’s Field Project. 32 Student-room sketch, Master’s Field Project.
31
50
33 Competition sketch of the rooms and circulation spaces, Master’s Field Project. The ‘Picturesque’ episodic approach to designing movement across the site can be viewed in its organisation.
METHODOLOGY
32
Sitting room Housekeeping Lift Four-door cluster En-suite Kitchen 33
51
Bay window
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
34
Residential
Ancillary space
Common use
Internal circulation
Academic use
Nursery
Reception area
Sub-station
Quiet space
Refuse store
34-5 Rendered landscape plans, Master’s Field Project.
52
METHODOLOGY
35
53
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
54
METHODOLOGY
36
36 View from Manor Road towards the graduate terrace, Master’s Field Project.
55
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
37
37 Student room bay window, Master’s Field Project.
56
METHODOLOGY
38
38 Corner detail, Master’s Field Project.
57
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
University College Oxford
The latest project for University College Oxford has an intergenerational programme for an inclusive urban environment to be shared across the full age spectrum, from nursery children to older people in residential care. Principally student accommodation with ancillary facilities, including a nursery, it also hosts a residential home to provide exceptional care for elderly residents. Realising this programmatic social vision, NMLA’s design rests on the principle that movement throughout the site is also movement through social spaces of intergenerational encounter. The design does not segregate the young students from older people in separate urban clusters, as it offers them multiple occasions for visual connection and social interaction through interlocking spaces of movement and rest. The architectural design also engages with the Victorian Gothic character of the suburb in which the college is situated. Alluding to the older architectural layers of the city, NMLA’s modern architectural forms subtly reinforce the intergenerational aspirations of the project.
39 Model, University College Oxford.
58
METHODOLOGY
39
59
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
60
METHODOLOGY
40
40 View of the café across Walnut Lawn, University College Oxford.
61
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Dissemination
The ROQ Masterplan project has been positively reviewed and presented in Con Arquitectura (2014). The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre has been positively reviewed and presented in the Architects’ Journal (2018); The Architect’s Newspaper (2018); Building Design (2017) and The RIBA Journal (2018). Níall McLaughlin has written about the Oxford Projects in Detail (2019) and The RIAI Journal (2019).
Níall McLaughlin has spoken about the Oxford Projects in the following presentations, seminars, talks and lectures: · Investcorp Building, Oxford (2019) · Oxford City Council (2019) · Ecobuild, London (2017) · Feilden Clegg Bradley Design Symposium, Oxford (2017) · Somerville College, Oxford (2017) · RIBA Oxford Preservation Trust (2016) · Yale University, New Haven (2015) · Architecture Foundation Australia, NSW (2014) · Futuna Lecture Series, Auckland, Christchurch and Wellington (2014) · International Architecture Forum, Hamburg (2014) The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre was presented in the following invited talks and lectures: · RIBA, London (2019) · St Vincent Street Church, Glasgow (2019) · University of Cambridge (2018) · The Pavilion at the Tower of London (2018) · Rook Lane Chapel, Frome (2018) · Galway International Arts Festival (2018) · Academy of Architectural Culture, Hamburg (2018) · RIBA Stirling Stories, York/London (2018) · Bergen Architectural Association (2018) · University of Bath (2018) · Studio in the Woods, Wyre Forest (2017) · AIA Colorado, Keystone (2017) · The Architecture Centre, Bristol (2016) · Architectural Association of Ireland, Dublin (2015) · RIAI Annual Conference, Dublin (2015) The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre was part of Níall McLaughlin’s Presences installation (41) at the 16th International Architecture Exhibition, La Biennale di Venezia (2018).
62
DISSEMINATION / PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Project Highlights
The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre has won multiple awards: · RIBA National Award (2018) · RIBA Regional Award (2018) · RIBA South Building of the Year Award (2018) · RIBA Wood Award (2018) · Oxford Preservation Trust Award (2017) · Shortlisted for the RIBA Stirling Prize (2018) · Nominated for the Mies Van der Rohe Award for European Architecture (2018)
The intention for this decade-long series of projects in Oxford is that it forms a prototype for other architectural interventions in historic urban environments which can be applied to cities across the UK, both by NMLA and others engaged in this area. The knowledge accumulated throughout this research project has led to further building commissions for NMLA, including Jesus College, Magdalene College, Peterhouse and Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge. The Oxford Projects, therefore, constitute part of an ongoing field of research, as architectural intervention in historic urban environments becomes a critical issue in the context of increasing scales and regulations on cities and landscapes internationally. The project has also been a catalyst for cross-faculty knowledge sharing within UCL. A dialogue with researchers in the Historic and Urban Environments department has developed to further explore how architecture contributes to the urban fabric of a historic environment and how that can be further analysed, interpreted and developed in a series of related disciplines, from planning to heritage studies.
The building was presented as part of Níall McLaughlin’s installation for the 16th International Architecture Exhibition, La Biennale di Venezia (2018).
63
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
41 Models on a rotating table as part of McLaughlin’s installation at the 16th International Architecture Exhibition, La Biennale di Venezia.
64
DISSEMINATION / PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS / BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bibliography Holbrook, T. (2012). ‘Town and Gown’. Architecture Today. 226. pp. 38–47. Níall McLaughlin Architects (2010). The Tradition of Modern Architecture in Oxford. www.niallmclaughlin.com/wp-content/ uploads/2014/11/The-Tradition-Of-ModernArchitecture-Niall-McLaughlin.pdf Níall McLaughlin Architects (2011). Radcliffe Observatory Quarter: Walton Street Wall Strategy Document. www.niallmclaughlin.com/wp-content/ uploads/2015/02/Walton-Street-Wall.pdf Pevsner, N. (2010). Visual Planning and the Picturesque. Los Angeles: Getty.
41
65
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Related Publications by the Researchers McLaughlin, N. (2019). ‘Detail: Master’s Field Student Accommodation, Oxford UK’. The RIAI Journal. 304. pp. 90–1. McLaughlin, N. (2019). ‘Lecture Hall Complex in Oxford’. Detail. 38. pp. 38–41.
Related Writings by Others Architects’ Journal (2018). ‘The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre: Níall McLaughlin Architects’. Architects’ Journal. 245 (12). p. 34. Branscome, E. (2018). ‘A Portrait of the Architect as a Wood Model: Niall McLaughlin’s 2018 Venice Biennale Model Finds a Temporary Home in London’. The Architect’s Newspaper. 18 January. Bustler (2018). ‘Closer Look: Niall McLaughlin Architects’ Elegant Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre in Oxford’. Bustler. 10 August. Griffiths, A. (2018). ‘Niall McLaughlin Architects Adds Stone-Clad Auditorium to Oxford College Campus’. Dezeen. 2 August. Holbrook, T. (2012). ‘Town and Gown’. Architecture Today. 226. pp. 38–47. Ijeh, I. (2017). ‘Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre, Oxford by Níall McLaughlin Architects’. Building Design. 27 July. Joyce, A. (2018). ‘Irish Architect Nominated for Sterling Prize for Oxford Building’. The Irish Times. 20 July. Oxford Mail (2018). ‘College Theatre is on Shortlist for Prestigious Architects’ Prize’. Oxford Mail. 19 July. Roma Publications (2018). ‘Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre’. Premier Construction.
66
RELATED PUBLICATIONS
RIBA (2018). ‘The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre’. RIBA. Slessor, C. (2018). ‘The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre by Níall McLaughlin Architects’. Architects’ Journal. 245 (18). pp. 104–19. The Telegraph (2018). ‘Revealed: The London Office Named Britain’s Best New Building’. The Telegraph. 12 October. Wiegel, A. (2019). ‘In Dialogue with its Surroundings: Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre in Oxford’. Detail. 5 March. Wilson, R. (2018). ‘Building Study: High ordinary’. Architects’ Journal. 245 (1). pp. 28–42. Young, E. (2018). ‘In Praise of Shadows’. The RIBA Journal. 125 (8). pp. 26–31.
Printed article
Online article (clickable link)
67
NÍALL MC LAUGHLIN ARCHITECTS
OXFORD PROJECTS
Image Credits
Bartlett Design Research Folios
All images © Níall McLaughlin Architects, unless otherwise stated.
ISSN 2753-9822
Photo: Nick Kane © Somerville College 16–7 Model: Joshua Scott 36 Image: Picture Plane 39 Model: Base Models 40 © Lab Ltd, Níall McLaughlin Architects 1–2, 9–10, 28–9, 41
© 2022 The Bartlett School of Architecture. All rights reserved.
5–6
Text © the authors Founder of the series and lead editor: Yeoryia Manolopoulou Edited by Yeoryia Manolopoulou, Barbara Penner, Phoebe Adler Editorial Collaborator: Stelios Giamarelos Picture researcher: Sarah Bell Additional project management: Srijana Gurung Graphic design and typesetting: Objectif Every effort has been made to trace the copyright holders of the material reproduced in this publication. If there have been any omissions, we will be pleased to make appropriate acknowledgement in revised editions.
BARTLETT DESIGN RESEARCH FOLIOS
2022 SERIES
Design for Learning AY Architects
Poikilokydric Living Marcos Cruz
Life of Clay Guan Lee
Audialsense Paul Bavister
Warsaw Karowa Bridge DKFS Architects
Flood House Matthew Butcher
Photosynthetic Architecture ecoLogicStudio
Digital Manual Guan Lee, Daniel Widrig
Instruments Nine and Ten Nat Chard Coworking Spaces Izaskun Chinchilla Architects Organic Growth Pavilion Izaskun Chinchilla Architects TransDisciplinary PostDigital FrAgility Marjan Colletti + REX|LAB
Discrete Timber Architecture Gilles Retsin LA Futures Smout Allen
Kew House Tim Lucas
Infractus Smout Allen
Losing Myself Yeoryia Manolopoulou, Níall McLaughlin
A Register of User Adaptations Storp Weber Architects
Oxford Projects Níall McLaughlin Architects
Uncovering Casa Sperimentale Storp Weber Architects
High Street Regeneration Jan Kattein Architects
Funicular del Tibidabo Miàs Architects
Oxford North Jonathan Kendall
The Cloud Miàs Architects
Cork Construction Oliver Wilton, Matthew Barnett Howland
Hakka Cultural Park Christine Hawley, Abigail Ashton, Andrew Porter, Moyang Yang
Alga(e)zebo mam
55/02 sixteen*(makers)
Chong Qing Nan Lu Towers mam
Envirographic and Techno Natures Smout Allen
City of Ladies Penelope Haralambidou Discrete Methods for Spatial Robotic Extrusion Manuel Jiménez García, Gilles Retsin
Playing the Picturesque You + Pea
2015 SERIES
Bloom Alisa Andrasek, José Sanchez House of Flags AY Architects Montpelier Community Nursery AY Architects Design for London Peter Bishop 2EmmaToc / Writtle Calling Matthew Butcher, Melissa Appleton River Douglas Bridge DKFS Architects Open Cinema Colin Fournier, Marysia Lewandowska The ActiveHouse Stephen Gage Déjà vu Penelope Haralambidou Urban Collage Christine Hawley
House Refurbishment in Carmena Izaskun Chinchilla Architects Refurbishment of Garcimuñoz Castle Izaskun Chinchilla Architects Gorchakov’s Wish Kreider + O’Leary Video Shakkei Kreider + O’Leary Megaframe Dirk Krolikowski (Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners) Seasons Through the Looking Glass CJ Lim Agropolis mam
ProtoRobotic FOAMing mam, Grymsdyke Farm, REX|LAB Banyoles Old Town Refurbishment Miàs Architects Torre Baró Apartment Building Miàs Architects Alzheimer’s Respite Centre Níall McLaughlin Architects Bishop Edward King Chapel Níall McLaughlin Architects Block N15 Façade, Olympic Village Níall McLaughlin Architects
Hydrological Infrastructures Smout Allen Lunar Wood Smout Allen Universal Tea Machine Smout Allen British Exploratory Land Archive Smout Allen, Geoff Manaugh 101 Spinning Wardrobe Storp Weber Architects Blind Spot House Storp Weber Architects
Regeneration of Birzeit Historic Centre Palestine Regeneration Team
Green Belt Movement Teaching and Learning Pavilion Patrick Weber
PerFORM Protoarchitecture Lab
Modulating Light and Views Patrick Weber