www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/319950.319970acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Indexing and retrieval of scientific literature

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 November 1999Publication History

ABSTRACT

The web has greatly improved access to scientific literature. However, scientific articles on the web are largely disorganized, with research articles being spread across archive sites, institution sites, journal sites, and researcher homepages. No index covers all of the available literature, and the major web search engines typically do not index the content of Postscript/PDF documents at all. This paper discusses the creation of digital libraries of scientific literature on the web, including the efficient location of articles, full-text indexing of the articles, autonomous citation indexing, information extraction, display of query-sensitive summaries and citation context, hubs and authorities computation, similar document detection, user profiling, distributed error correction, graph analysis, and detection of overlapping documents. The software for the system is available at no cost for non-commercial use.

References

  1. 1.J.M. Barrie and D.E. Presti. The World Wide Web as an instructional tool. Science, 274:371-372, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.K. Bharat and M.R. Henzinger. Improved algorithms for topic distillation in a hyperlinked environment. In SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Kurt Bollacker, Steve Lawrence, and C. Lee Giles. CiteSeer: An autonomous web agent for automatic retrieval and identification of interesting publications. In Katia P. Sycara and Michael Wooldridge, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 116-123, New York, 1998. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Kurt Bollacker, Steve Lawrence, and C. Lee Giles. A system for automatic personalized tracking of scientific literature on the web. In Digital Libraries 99- The Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 105-113, New York, 1999. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.S. Brin, J. Davis, and H. Garcia-Molina. Copy detection mechanisms for digital documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Annual Conference, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In Seventh International Worm Wide Web Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Andrei Broder, Steve Glassman, Mark Manasse, and Geoffrey Zweig. Syntactic clustering of the web. In Sixth International World Wide Web Conference, pages 391-404, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Eric W. Brown, James P. Callan, and W. Bruce Croft. Fast incremental indexing for full-text information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Databases, pages 192-202, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Robert D. Cameron. A universal citation database as a catalyst for reform in scholarly communication. First Monday, 2(4), 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Junghoo Cho, Hector Garcia-Molina, and Lawrence Page. Efficient crawling through URL ordering. In Proceedings of the Seventh World-Wide Web Conference, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Doug Cutting and Jan Pedersen. Optimizations for dynamic inverted index maintenance, in Proceedings of the I3th International ACM SIG1R Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 405---411, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Eugene Garfield. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. Wiley, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.C. Lee Giles, Kurt Bollacker, and Steve Lawrence. CiteSeer: An automatic citation indexing system. In Ian Witten, Rob Akscyn, and Frank M. Shipman III, editors, Digital Libraries 98- The Third ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 89-98, Pittsburgh, PA, June 23-26 1998. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.P. Ginsparg. First steps towards electronic research communication. Computers in Physics, 8:390-396, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.S. Hitchcock, L. Carr, S. Harris, J.M.N. Hey, and W. Hall. Citation linking: Improving access to online journals. In Robert B. Allen and Edie Rasmussen, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 115-122, New York, NY, 1997. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.H. Kautz, B. Selman, and M. Shah. ReferralWeb: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Communications of the A CM, 30(3), 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.J. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In Proceedings ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 668-677, San Francisco, California, 25-27 January 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Steve Lawrence, Kurt Bollacker, and C. Lee Giles. Distributed error correction, in Digital Libraries 99 - The Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, page 232, New York, 1999. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles. Context and page analysis for improved web search. IEEE Internet Computing, 2(4):38-46, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles. Searching the World Wide Web. Science, 280(5360):98-t00, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21.Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles. Accessibility of information on the web. Nature, 400(6740):107-109, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.J. Rennie and A. McCallum. Using reinforcement learning to spider the web efficiently. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.E. Selberg and O. Etzioni. Multi-service search and comparison using the MetaCrawler. In Proceedings of the 1995 World Wide Web Conference, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Kristie Seymore, Andrew McCallum, and Roni Rosen~ feld. Learning hidden Markov model structure for information extraction. In AAAI 99 Workshop on Machine Learning for Information Extraction, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.N. Shivakumar and H. Garcia-Molina. SCAM: A copy detection mechanism for digital documents. In 2nd International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Anthony Tomasic, Hector Garcia-Molina, and Kurt Shoens. Incremental updates of inverted lists for text document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 1994 A CM SIGMOD Conference, pages 289-300, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.A. Tombros and M. Sanderson. Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval. In Proceedings of S1G1R 98, Melbourne, Australia, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Anastasios Tombros. Reflecting User Information Needs Through Query Biased Summaries. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, September 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.I.H. Witten, A. Moffat, and T.C. Bell. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and indexing documents and images. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31.I.H. Witten, C.G. Nevill-Manning, and S.J.Cunningham. Building a digital library for computer science research: technical issues. In Proceedings Australasian Computer Science Conference, Melbourne, Australia, January 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.I.H. Witten, C.G. Nevill-Manning, and S.J. Cunningham. Digital libraries based on fulltext retrieval. In Proceedings of WebNet 96, San Francisco, October 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Indexing and retrieval of scientific literature

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CIKM '99: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on Information and knowledge management
              November 1999
              564 pages
              ISBN:1581131461
              DOI:10.1145/319950

              Copyright © 1999 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 November 1999

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

              Upcoming Conference

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader