www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Bibliometric analysis of fracking scientific literature

Published: 01 November 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This study uses bibliometric methods to analyze the scientific literature of fracking. Web of Science database, including the Science Citation Index, Sciences Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index--Science were used to collect the data. The analysis done in the paper looks at the annual distribution of publications, countries, institutes, authors, journals and categories. Furthermore, key topics and highly-cited papers were analyzed. The results show that fracking as a new research term appears in the Web of Science records from 1953 and its presence in the Web of Science has been growing ever since, becoming a hot topic recently. The countries with most of the contributions have been USA, China and Canada, whereas the Russian Academy of Sciences, University of Oklahoma and Tohoku University were the three institutions with most publications in fracking research. The publications have been concentrated in several journals, led by the Journal of Petroleum Technology, He m oe Xo cm o and International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, and categorized mainly in geosciences multidisciplinary, Engineering Petroleum and Energy Fuels. The study has identified that terms of fracking can be divided into three main clusters, related to "drilling methods", "exploitation/extraction process" and the "geoscience aspects". The highly cited papers in the period 1953---2013 were collected and analyzed, in order to show the papers with highest impact in fracking area.

    References

    [1]
    Davies, R., et al. (2013). Induced seismicity and hydraulic fracturing for the recovery of hydrocarbons. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 45 , 171-185.
    [2]
    de Rijke, K. (2013) Hydraulically fractured: Unconventional gas and anthropology. Anthropology Today, 29 (2), 13-17 (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate).
    [3]
    ENERGY-TRANS Project (NO.17016): The Helmholtz Alliance ENERGY-TRANS (future infrastructures for meeting energy demands. Towards sustainability and social compatibility--Part "Risk Maps") (cited 2014; Available from: http://www.energy-trans.de/english/index.php).
    [4]
    Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227 (5259), 669-671.
    [5]
    Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics, 3 (3), 173-179.
    [6]
    Ho, Y. S. (2012) Comments on "a bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900-2010". Scientometrics, 96 , 1-3.
    [7]
    Howarth, R. W., Santoro, R., & Ingraffea, A. (2011). Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change, 106 (4), 679-690.
    [8]
    IRGC. (2013). Risk governance guidelines for unconventional gas development . Lausanne, Switzerland: International Risk Governance Council.
    [9]
    Jovanovic, A., Klimek, P., & Zarea, M. (2012) Monitoring public perception of risks related to unconventional exploitation of gas. In "Think Piece" for the IRGC workshop on "Risk governance guidelines for unconventional gas development" . International Risk Governance Council.
    [10]
    Jovanovic, A., & Balo¿, D. (2013). iNTeg-Risk project: Concept and first results. Journal of Risk Research, 16 (3-4), 275-291.
    [11]
    Jovanovic, A., & Renn, O. (2013). Search for the 'European way' of taming the risks of new technologies: The EU research project iNTeg-Risk. Journal of Risk Research, 16 (3-4), 271-274.
    [12]
    Kerr, R. A. (2010). Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. Science, 328 (5986), 1624-1626.
    [13]
    Osborn, S. G., et al. (2011). Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (20), 8172-8176.
    [14]
    Ren, J.-L., et al. (2013). An informetric profile of water resources management literatures. Water Resources Management, 27 (13), 4679-4696.
    [15]
    Rivard, C., et al. (2014). An overview of Canadian shale gas production and environmental concerns. International Journal of Coal Geology, .
    [16]
    US-Energy-Information-Administration. (2013). Annual energy outlook 2013 with projections to 2040 .
    [17]
    Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523-538.

    Cited By

    View all

    Index Terms

    1. Bibliometric analysis of fracking scientific literature
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Scientometrics
      Scientometrics  Volume 105, Issue 2
      November 2015
      580 pages

      Publisher

      Springer-Verlag

      Berlin, Heidelberg

      Publication History

      Published: 01 November 2015

      Author Tags

      1. Bibliometric
      2. Fracking
      3. Hydraulic fracturing
      4. Knowledge mapping
      5. Shale gas

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media