Commons:Deletion requests/File:Icon webview.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The permission for use says:
- Copyright © Chromium project
- Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
- Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
- Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
- Neither the name of Chromium project nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
Therefore, at a minimum, any use of this logo must include the copyright notice and list of conditions above. That is more than permitted for a Commons file. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- This file is a browser icon from AOSP. AOSP is licensed under Apache Lisence 2.0. Артём 13327 (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- As I noted above, the Apache license requires that any use of the work is accompanied by a copy of the license. That is not possible for most uses in print and many uses on line. In fact, since our copy of the image does not include a full copy of the license, Commons is infringing. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- But we don't delete all android screenshots. Артём 13327 (talk) 16:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- "more than permitted for a Commons file". Are you basically saying that the BSD license is non-free? ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- More precisely the "three clause BSD license". Ruslik (talk) 19:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is a GPL-compatible license. Ruslik (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- As I noted above, the Apache license requires that any use of the work is accompanied by a copy of the license. That is not possible for most uses in print and many uses on line. In fact, since our copy of the image does not include a full copy of the license, Commons is infringing. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep BSD is a known-free license, and we don't have a problem with those terms. The GFDL, with pages and pages of text, was more of a problem. That is so far the only free license we discourage. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as per Carl Lindberg. --Yann (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
