User talk:Yann

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

• User:Yann/Valued images, 2009-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2019
• User:Yann/Quality images, 2005-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2023
• User:Yann/Featured images, 2009-2018, 2019-2023
• User:Yann/Featured media

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello yan! would you be willing to undelete my content? I am the creator for this content and confused about the license at first and tried to change the license via edit tab, turns out it was the one that made this content deleted. Then I tried to upload the same file without realizing that it was actually forbidden.

I then had learned more about license and hereby agree to bestow this content the same license as before as cc by sa 4.0, so can you please undelete this content so it can made available to public again? I already made an undeletion request but It didn't get any response, what do i need to do to get my content back to the web? Errizdwi (talk) 02:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Errizdwi: Where do you want to use your content? Any Wikipedia article? Yann (talk) 08:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I'm planning to use it here https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasi_kotak Errizdwi (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK done. Yann (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! Errizdwi (talk) 08:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Beppe_Grillo_and_Giacinto_Auriti.jpg--Cats' photos (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PierreRepp-1953.png

Hello Yann,

Comme l'a déjà précisé Ruthven dans un cas similaire (voir lien ci-après), le seul motif URAA ne peut pas permettre la suppression car pour le reste, ce fichier est bien PD-France car il a été réalisé et publié au titte d'oeuvre collective par une agence, avant 1954 (j'ai précisé la source en référence, publiée dans un livre). La suppression n'est donc pas possible.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Berger-Gall-Italie-1984.png

Merci de ta compréhension. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tisourcier: Bonjour, La question de l'URAA est compliquée et controversée. En théorie, l'URAA peut s'appliquer aux oeuvres collectives. Je pense que l'on ne devrait pas en tenir compte pour les documents de plus de 70 ans, mais je suis plutôt en minorité de ce point de vue. Yann (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted these images as copyright violations, but they were released by the creator under CC BY-SA - see their source: https://thecatamites.itch.io/anthology-of-the-killer Eldomtom2 (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I undeleted them, and created regular DRs instead. Yann (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template, which you deleted, has 44 inclusions. Туча (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann. Are you able to oversight something for me at Commons? If so, I'll email you the details. -- Valjean (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valjean: Hi, Yes sure, but it won't be oversighted, just hidden from anyone, except admins. Yann (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That'll work. An email will arrive shortly. -- Valjean (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valjean: Done. Yann (talk) 18:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Have a great day. -- Valjean (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The representative of the copyright holder, who gave me authority to use the image is off for 4th of July but they will be sending an email when they return. Can we restore the image so when they send an email it will be live again? I had this issue with the other image from yesterday but the copyright holder was able to send an email promptly. Nolansfood (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nolansfood: Hi, The image wil be undeleted when the permission is validated. The author can provided the name of the file in their email. Yann (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You recently speedily deleted the above file. I attempted to leave a note regarding this but unfortunately the link allowing me to contest the speedy deletion didn't work for me so instead I left this note on the file's discussion page. Prior to the speedy deletion the image was used on the Joaquim Santos' Wikidata item but we also wanted to reuse the image as he is an organiser of the Wikidata WikiProject IBC 2024 but also in slides for our Wikidata workshop we are putting on, which we will later upload into WikiCommons. Would it be possible for you to undo the speedy deletion of this file? Thanks for your consideration. Ambrosia10 (talk) 08:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file no deleted, it's blue. メイド理世 (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 20:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You recently deleted a file uploaded by the account WIKIBRASC3 ( local | logs | global ). I would like to request that you review their edits here on Commons due to the number of files deleted.

WIKIBRASC3 is about to be banned from creating articles on the Portuguese Wikipedia. However, I have noticed that they have been uploading files here and adding them to articles there, often replacing files uploaded directly to Wikipedia due to license restrictions. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Conde Edmond Dantès: Hi, Please write such requests on COM:ANU. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to have your opinion regarding of files such as, among others, this one and whether they're suitable for Commons. Indeed, while the uniform itself (generic colors and design) seems to be OK, however, I can't really say the same thing about the use even if at de minimis scale of logos that otherwise - alone - are mostly forbidden from upload on Commons due to copyright issues. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 21:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Harrisonkrank. Yann (talk) 12:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I recently got a notification from you stating that you will block me if I violate another copyright, I will get blocked. But I dont think that's fair, because after I got notifications of me uploading pictures on wikipedia, I stopped doing it and I only got notified 3 years after I learned my lesson. If I get blocked for something that I didnt do recently, it would not be alright. If that happens, what should I do? Badabingbadaboong (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Badabingbadaboong: You won't be blocked if you don't upload any more copyright violations. Yann (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately pseudo-procedurally closing this immediately after I voted to delete seems like a clear attempt at supervoting. I’m requesting that you revert this extremely bad close. If you don’t I’m going to report an abuse of administrative privilege. Dronebogus (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is really a bad close of DR, @Yann. There's no previous discussion for this photo and we are discussing on that page. There's some reason for deleting this per talk page.
Please revert your close, thank you.
@Dronebogus Lemonaka (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will once again ask you to reconsider this DR. Dronebogus (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Chute de la Maison Usher (1928) by Jean Epstein.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 01:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for weighing in at Commons:Deletion requests/File:FK Kolubara logo.svg. The same user also nominated some more fairly uncomplex logos for deletion, would you care to weigh in on those DRs as well? If so, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:KK Crvena Zvezda (logo).svg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SD Crvena zvezda and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of FK Crvena zvezda. Jonteemil (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to know what is exact cause of deletion for this page? I thought it is normal and convenient to hold files about one publication at one category, in this case it is one Belarusian-language translated book that could hold the book and category for illustrations. Thank you in advance! Plaga med (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Plaga med: Empty categories are routinely deleted, unless a redirect is really useful. Yann (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Then I can recreate the page and populate it? Plaga med (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Plaga med: Yes, fine. Yann (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good, Thank you! Plaga med (talk) 13:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vicky Sylvester Mnguember.jpg from my original nomination. That has given the chance for other eyes to see it. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, why don't those images qualify for speedy? Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 17:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts: I can't access the source, but if these images were published at that time, the license is plausible. Now if they were only first published recently, they are no OK. And in this case, it seems better to create one DR only for them all. Yann (talk) 08:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Double Amour (1925), affiche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 03:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"An exception occurred: DownloadError: b'ERROR: unable to download video data: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden'"

Any clue how to fix? Trade (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Hi, V2C is broken is several ways. If you know Python, your help would be greatly appreciated. Otherwise, just restart your task, or wait for the tool to be fixed. Yann (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did restarting worked for you? Trade (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Sometimes, yes. Yann (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you noticed that there seems to be specific channels that evade the errors? Trade (talk) 20:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. "specific channels"? Yann (talk) 20:40, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube channels of course Trade (talk) 20:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: No, I have never seen a relation between a specific channel and V2C errors. Results mostly depend on the video size. Small videos (< 500 MB) are usually OK. Big videos (> 2 GB) usually fail. In between, it varies. Yann (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yann.

Can you temporarily protect File:Brown rat distribution.png (which you did back in January, for a duration of two months)? I reverted the map (which is used by numerous articles across Wikipedia) to its original upload version. Other users put the man-made boundaries of Alberta to the map, depicting the whole province as devoid of the species brown rat (rattus norvegicus), which is false and baseless. This large province has a population of brown rats, and they do not stop at its invisible border. Brown rats are detected in the province and are often reported in the news.

Yours sincerely, Oirattas (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you reverted a map that neutrally says that it is disputed that brown rats are in Alberta and you did not explain the revert there. English Wikipedia has text that there are no brown rats in Alberta. I'm skeptical of the claim, but can we keep the version that says it's disputed? Abzeronow (talk) 21:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The SVG version shows the unfounded claim of Alberta being "rat free". The PNG map (which numerous Wikipedia articles already use) should remain the original way it was uploaded, without the man-made borders of Alberta. The later dubious addition of Alberta in the map, was the reason why the PNG map was removed in the English Wikipedia article en:brown rat. Oirattas (talk) 22:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Copyright_status_of_photos_by_French_photo_studio_Harcourt

Bonjour Yann,

Dans cette discussion, les mentions © publiées par RMN sont prises comme preuves alors que RMN et d'autres ressources publiques font souvent des copyvio. Si tu voulais bien confimer ce point dans la discussion ? Belle journée. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, c'est vraiment n'importe quoi. Les mentions © de RMN n'ont aucune valeur. Yann (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be here, being a non technical person , could not find any other way to reach you , you deleted below page on merit , means you are a true professional .

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Obaid_Azhar.jpg?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0AywnVMjoTRe8BLIS-kuIqHkYdKWJ7ZN_VnzJa2k2a5085zBa9hnAsNUM_aem_1IyRPxnyEF42_JuM2nQGgw

Please also review on merit below page belonging to same person , this is personal advertisement only, they are misusing it to scam public by giving misleading info on this platform with a very good SEO rating. Please give some time and review it thoroughly. Public will be obliged.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mian_Muhammad_Azhar_Ansari.jpg Kevenswodolkski (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]