Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This and the sub categories were created by @ŚŚ•ŚšŚ™ŚŚœ Ś›: . Apparently the subcategories either contain a single file or a single category containing a single file, which is just way over categorization and doesn't help anyone to find the images they are looking for. Also, all the sub-categories contain "by year" navigational templates that are full of dead links, which isn't helpful either. so I'd like to resolve it by up-merging most, if not all, of the files into "by decade" categories so there isn't the over categorization or the needless problems that come along with it anymore like "by years" navigational templates that are full of nothing but dead links. I tried to discuss it on the users talk page but unfortunately they were against using "by decade" categories for some reason that I'm still not clear on. I think that's the best way to categorize the files though, but I'd appreciate other opinions since ŚŚ•ŚšŚ™ŚŚœ Ś› disagreed. Adamant1 (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC) In my opinion, the categories here are wrong at most countries, because[reply]

  • agricultural activities (like irrigation, harvest, sowing, plowing, ...)

are not

Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 21:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@МоĐșĐŸĐ»Đ° ВасОлДчĐșĐŸ: I recognize Commons Administrator @AnRo0002: just started to check and move entries from Agricultural works to Agriculture. Maybe there are some works left. Or just empty categories. Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk |
Files. --МоĐșĐŸĐ»Đ° ВасОлДчĐșĐŸ (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like this has been resolved, unless I am missing something? Josh (talk) 20:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. Category full of typhoon pictures that take time to find, while you can go to the typhoon season, click a typhoon category, and browse for your picture, which is much easier. FooBarBaz (talk) 04:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, feel free to request it for deletion if it causes trouble, I have no objection. vip (talk) 13:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the term "cloudburst" is not a good for category name of each natural disasters. We should use a better term like "floods", "landslides", "debris flow". It should be noted that: 1)In Japan, this kind of disasters are often referred to as "è±Ș雹(heavy rain, torrential rain)", which focuses on "rain". 2)The actual disaster type is both floods and landslides (debris flows and landslides).

Here are some existing name examples:

My proposal: All "è±Ș雹" named disasters are uniformly named with "flood" and moreover add "Category:Debris flow in Japan", "Landslides in Japan in (year)" or other cats on a case-by-case basis.

  • Cloudburst damage of Hiroshima in 2014 --> "Hiroshima Landslides in 2014" (subcat of "August 2014 Flood in Japan")
  • July 2018 West Japan Cloudburst --> "July 2018 Japan Flood" (or "July 2018 West Japan Flood"?)
  • July 2020 Japan Cloudburst‎ --> "July 2020 Japan Flood"

--Peka (talk) 18:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The cast o the series is the same as the franchise as a whole. Redundant Trade (talk) 19:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hay pituto por judĂ­os? 186.172.228.88 12:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand correctly, pituto in the question above is Chilean slang, and the person is asking whether Jews have an advantage in terms of being directors, a rather out-of-line question. (I have strong but non-native Spanish, and it is possible I have misunderstood.)
If I have understood correctly, this discussion should be speedily closed, and possibly deleted. It has no bearing on what to do with the category. - Jmabel ! talk 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate: Category:Google New York office Xeror (talk) 10:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personal preference to Keep or Move to Category:Google buildings in New York City, as there are multiple Google buildings and offices in the city. The Google New York office category originally referred to the office and facilities within the 111 Eighth Avenue building‎. However, Google's website currently refers to the "Google New York office" as two campuses across the three buildings in the category (111 Eighth Avenue, Chelsea Market, St. John's Terminal). Tdorante10 (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate: Category:Google offices Xeror (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Redundant. grendel|khan 15:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect this should be merged to Category:Largo de São Bento, 37-A, which has a wikidata item. Jmabel ! talk 21:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are not a style. No need for one sucking image. 186.172.233.204 12:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be changed to Category:Yuppies (text)? There are multiple images now. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One lousy file insiste. 186.172.233.204 12:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Sedentarism"? 186.172.233.204 12:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How precisely do you know when seeing a man and woman naked together that neither is bisexual? In the case of a file like File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - cyclists 190.jpg how do you know they are a couple? For File:Human body - blurred.jpg, how do you even know they know each other (could be two entirely separate photos)? Etc. Seems to me there is a lot of presumption in "heterosexual couples" unless they have identified themselves as such. Jmabel ! talk 15:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense. 186.172.233.204 15:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

merge to Category:Kangso Yaksu mineral water bottling plant‎ Leo Miregalitheo (talk) 16:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Please Merge Category:Kangso Yaksu Processing Factory into Category:Kangso Yaksu mineral water bottling plant‎ and delete the empty category. --Leo Miregalitheo (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empty category of a former displya case in the Louvre, whe do not need this anymore and we coule delete it. Miniwark (talk) 16:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empty category of a former displya case in the Louvre, whe do not need this anymore and we could delete it. Miniwark (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is in 2024 indeed a showcase with this number. To keep. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 11:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The showcase 2 still exists (for example : https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010319871) Ted1968 (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Empty category of a former displya case in the Louvre, whe do not need this anymore and we could delete it. Miniwark (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empty category of a former displya case in the Louvre, whe do not need this anymore and we could delete it. Miniwark (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oui, je pense qu'on peut supprimer...en n'oubliant pas de modifier les transitions de vitrine à vitrine ; idem pour les autres mises en discussion avant. Faqscl (talk) 17:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung. In beiden Kategorien wurde nach LÀnder einsortiert. Ich habe die "location" geleert. Ich denke diese ist besser beschrieben: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:DHL_by_country Riquix (talk) 09:16, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empty Rathfelder (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to paraclimbing MaligneRange (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment en:Paraclimbing says that

Paraclimbing is competitive climbing for disabled athletes.

and

Sports classification for competitions differentiates paraclimbing from adaptive climbing in general.

(my emphasis). That seems to suggest that any form of recreational climbing would not be considered paraclimbing in the strict sense and a more general parent Category:Adaptive climbing would be better suited as a direct replacement for the current Category:Disabled climbing, with Category:Paraclimbing being a subcategory for its competitive aspects. No source were provided for that, though ... El Grafo (talk) 09:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It should be January 2021 and not 2021 January. 191.126.191.229 02:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only two entries here, Category:Cupid and Psyche and Category:Eos, are not deeds of Aphrodite.

If this is deleted:

--Auntof6 (talk) 07:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tentatively agree, unless someone can show that Auntof6 is missing something here. - Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Allforrous: I notice that you are populating the category, but I don't think the things being added are deeds, either. Can you explain the intent of this category? --Auntof6 (talk) 23:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, he can't. He just populates them when you open to discussion his categories. Anything serves. A soup bowl may be work of Aphrodite. He was there, observing her when she created the earthenware bowl. However, if you complain about him he says he's being harassed because he can't speak English. For some reason he never asks himself "why do I insist on making more and more new categories in a language I certainly do not know good enough, and so many people criticize me"... Am I wrong? 186.174.165.203 16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since Asclepius is a mythological character, most things about him are "in mythology", so I don't see the need for this category. It currently contains only one entry, Category:Chiron, which could just be moved up to Category:Asclepius alongside some categories for other mythological characters. Auntof6 (talk) 07:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with Auntof6. - Jmabel ! talk 15:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see that more entries have been added to this category, but the added entries are for more mythological characters and an constellation. These don't seem to make a case for keeping this category. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Read the above discussion please. 186.174.165.203 18:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this category is for maps showing history, and then supposed to be split into periods for each country.

However, each country has its own subcategories here:

  • "...under Ottoman Empire‎" <> "...under Ottoman rule" - (that gives a rough time period, okay...)
  • "...in modern times" <> "...in the early modern period‎" - (everything later than "medieval" qualifies? Wait, Ottomans weren't modern???)
  • "...the Habsburg period in the history of..." - again a rough timeframe... but yeah: including or excluding WW1? Why aren't the Habsburgs "modern"?
  • "...(1850–1918)‎" <> "...(16th-19th century)‎" "...(before 400‎)" - (yeah okay, this is quantifiable)
  • "...in the ÁrpĂĄd age‎" <> "...(Piasts)‎" <> "...(Jagiellons)‎" - (as if everyone knows right away when Arpad and the Piasts ruled)
  • "...in the Late Middle Ages‎" - (which is... when? Without consulting WP, approximately 1350-1500?) Or a century earlier? Did the LMA end everywhere at the same time?


--> My proposal is to go by century here. That enables everyone to contribute without first checking the Wikipedia for reference timeframes.

We already have "Maps of 5th/9th/12th/17th-century England/Italy/France/Germany/Spain" for example, although the respective parent categories are not all that great yet, either. Enyavar (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Enyavar: I'm not sure I understand your suggestion. Do you want to change this category, or its subcategories? -- Themightyquill (talk) 19:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First the subcategories, country by country. Then once we have established "Maps of ??th-century <country>" as subcategory of "Maps of the history of <country>" and "Maps showing ??th-century history", the "showing-by-period" category in itself would be superfluous. Likely because we'd have "by century". (But this is not an urgent project of mine.) --Enyavar (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Enyavar: Do you also want to delete everything in Category:History by period by country? --Themightyquill (talk)
Um, this is not a deletion discussion? Reworking/restructuring does not mean "just delete everything". But yes, for example, "Serbia by period" has "History of modern Serbia" as a subcategory, which is at least confusing because the Ottoman period includes the early modern, and the Habsburg rule is firmly in the modern period. That means that "modern Serbia" is randomly restricted to "past 1918", everything before is pre-modern? Contrasting, "History of Argentina" has subcategories defined by years (no overlapping definitions) and has no maps sorted by period anway. And "History of Ethiopia by period" just has "Ethiopia by century/decade/year" as subsets, which means nobody has to look up which period was when - that is great. Really, into which period would you instinctively sort a medieval Polish artifact dated to, say 1145? --Enyavar (talk) 07:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnötige Kategorie jenseits der Namenskonventionen, außerdem steht kein einziger dieser Bildstöcke in Fulda. GerritR (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Offenbar gibt es da eine Baustelle auf der Wikipedia, ich lass daher die Sache offen und werde auch erstmal diese Kategorie nicht weiter von den betroffenen Dateien entfernen, vielleicht wird ja ein noch Schuh draus. Es scheint jedenfalls, als sei der Begriff "Fuldaer Bildstock" mehr als eine Theoriefindung, sondern hat Anklang in der Literatur. Link zur Baustelle: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Monandowitsch/Fuldaer_Bildstock
GerritR (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo GerritR,
ich beschĂ€ftige mich derzeit in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia mit den verschiedenen Bildstocktypen der Bildstocklandschaft Franken. Im Zuge dieses Projekts entstanden bereits mehrere Artikel, zu denen auch jeweils eine Commons-Kategorie aufgemacht wurde. Der Artikel zum Fuldaer Bildstock soll heute noch veröffentlicht werden. Es handelt sich um einen in der Literatur etablierten Bildstocktyp, weshalb ich auch die zugehörige Commons-Kategorie fĂŒr sinnvoll halte. --Monandowitsch (talk) 10:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monument architectural récent (2000), a priori protégé par le droit d'auteur(s) Fr.Latreille (talk) 21:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request: This category is overly specific "SVG" when other equivalent categories in Category:Wikimedia user rights icons do not specify the file format and there are not enough files here to require this specificity. Infact this left the parent category Category:Wikiversity user rights icons was entirely empty until I updated the file cats. Terasail[✉] 11:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this category Is for a notable actor, it should be linked to his Wikidata Ă­tem. 191.126.43.154 17:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category is the misspelled version of another category, request to delete it JJonahJackalope (talk) 20:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be moved to Category:Georgia Indictment of Donald Trump? There's only been one so far, and methinks, if there were more, media related to them would be categorized separately. Heavy Water (talk) 02:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can move to that category when the discussion is closed. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 03:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any difference from the parent category? 186.174.89.102 18:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between Category:Concrete architecture and Category:Concrete structures? Can these two categories be merged or can one be a parent of the other? JopkeB (talk) 06:52, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JopkeB: they are not the same. Roads, river channels, monuments and memorials and so on are not architecture. --Orijentolog (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Orijentolog. But the main category Category:Structures is a subcategory of Category:Architecture. Is that not correct? JopkeB (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe the other way around as all buildings in the category architecture would also be considered structures?
It might be an issue of personal preference whether the category architecture should be placed in the category structures or be listed more prominently directly in the category concrete.
KaiKemmann (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any ice sculptures in these pictures, so the category name is misleading. I propose a merge back into the parent category, and rename that one into "Hyperborea (Petrozavodsk festival)" Enyavar (talk) 20:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a major category about a major European war that was not limited to Germany, so the category should bear an English name. I was astounded to find "Befreiungskriege" the English termin is either "German Campaign of 1913" (en-WP) or "(German) Liberation War(s) of 1813-1815" (alt-name in en-WP) or possibly "War of the Sixth Coalition" (we have that category already, and the Liberation Wars overlap with 6th+7th Coalition, so probably not that) --Enyavar (talk) 20:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what is a difference between category "gas caps" and Category:Automobile fuel fillers. Maybe they should be merged - or we need some clear criteria. Pibwl (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I don’t remember why I created Category:Gas caps back in 2014 when Category:Automobile fuel fillers already existed for 2y, but better late than never.
Now, should this dicussion had happened in one of the relevant talk pages, we could immediately enact the move and be done with it. But since it was chosen to start one of these CfD precesses with their labyrinthine protocol, we’ll have to wait a few days (weeks, months?) before the actual work can be done. So: yay?
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So maybe, if there is a consensus and nobody objectes in several days, we could just merge categories irregardless of CfD? Or, as I'm now reading, we can wait 2 weeks and close the discussion formally. Pibwl (talk) 11:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean ... if you want to be super particular about it you could argue that:
  • "filler" = entire assembly of filler pipe + cap (+ cover on modern passenger cars)
  • "cap" = lid you use to cover the pipe end
or maybe alternatively:
  • "filler" = the end of the filler pipe you pour your fuel into
  • "cap" = lid you use to cover that end
I'm not a native speaker, but simply looking at the functional aspects it seems logical to treat the cap as either a separate thing or a part of a larger thing. El Grafo (talk) 10:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How did this relatively recent category come to replace the longstanding Category:Reliefs of the Buddha. I didn't see any discussion. To the best of my knowledgeu there is, according to tradition, one Buddha, Sihddhartha Gautama, and these are all (in theory) statues of that individual. "Buddhas" seems entirely wrong to me here. But feel free to "enlighten" me on the matter. Jmabel ! talk 01:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are, in fact, many Buddhas. Siddhartha Gautama, also known as Shakyamuni, was the historical founder of Buddhism. You can refer to Category:Buddhas by name for a look at some other Buddhas who are traditionally recognized, though the list is far from exhaustive. Invokingvajras | talk 01:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Invokingvajras: Then surely the category should not have been merged, since there is no question what individual is known in English as the Buddha, and all of these statues were of him. - 14:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Much of the content in "~of the Buddha" categories included images of other Buddhas. This is a good opportunity to clarify. As OP indicated, there is still confusion about "who's who" for those who don't really know about Buddhism. - 4:23, 20 Aug 2023 (UTC)
@Invokingvajras: So imaginably a subcat. But it should not have become a redirect, and certainly this should not have been changed without discussion. - Jmabel ! talk 19:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the items in this category is a deed; all the items (at the time I write this) are mythological characters. Auntof6 (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Another meaningless category. Delete it. 186.174.165.203 15:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to the CFD for Category:Asclepius, since Dionysus is a mythological character, most things about him are "in mythology", so I don't see the need for this category. It currently contains some categories for mythological figures and a the categories "Myths about Dionysos" and "Dionysos as a child". These could just be moved under Category:Dionysos. Auntof6 (talk) 08:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, delete it. It is a stupid categorization. 186.174.165.203 15:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another one. The things in this category (at the time I write this) are mostly mythological characters, not deeds. Auntof6 (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ĐĐŸĐŒĐžĐœĐžŃ€ŃƒŃŽ ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃƒŃŽ ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŽ ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐŸĐ±ŃŃƒĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ: ĐœĐ° ВоĐșОсĐșлаЎД ужД Đ”ŃŃ‚ŃŒ ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃ AKSM-321, ĐŽĐ»Ń Ń‚Ń€ĐŸĐ»Đ»Đ”ĐčĐ±ŃƒŃĐŸĐČ ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đž 321 ĐżŃ€ĐŸĐžĐ·ĐČĐŸĐŽŃŃ‚ĐČĐ° БДлĐșĐŸĐŒĐŒŃƒĐœĐŒĐ°Ńˆ. ĐŸŃ€Đ”ĐŽĐ»Đ°ĐłĐ°ŃŽ ĐœĐ” ŃƒĐŽĐ°Đ»ŃŃ‚ŃŒ ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŽ BKM-321, Đ° ŃĐŸĐ·ĐŽĐ°Ń‚ŃŒ ĐżĐ”Ń€Đ”ĐœĐ°ĐżŃ€Đ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ĐœĐ° ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŽ AKSM-321. I nominate this category for discussion: there is already the AKSM-321 category on Wikimedia Commons, for trolleybuses model 321, designed and built by Belkommunmash. I suggest creating a redirect. ATI1999 (talk) 09:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ĐĐŸĐŒĐžĐœĐžŃ€ŃƒŃŽ ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃƒŃŽ ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŽ ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐŸĐ±ŃŃƒĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ: ĐœĐ° ВоĐșОсĐșлаЎД ужД Đ”ŃŃ‚ŃŒ ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃ AKSM-201, ĐŽĐ»Ń Ń‚Ń€ĐŸĐ»Đ»Đ”ĐčĐ±ŃƒŃĐŸĐČ ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đž 201 ĐżŃ€ĐŸĐžĐ·ĐČĐŸĐŽŃŃ‚ĐČĐ° БДлĐșĐŸĐŒĐŒŃƒĐœĐŒĐ°Ńˆ. ĐŸŃ€Đ”ĐŽĐ»Đ°ĐłĐ°ŃŽ ĐœĐ” ŃƒĐŽĐ°Đ»ŃŃ‚ŃŒ ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŽ BKM-201, Đ° ŃĐŸĐ·ĐŽĐ°Ń‚ŃŒ ĐżĐ”Ń€Đ”ĐœĐ°ĐżŃ€Đ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ĐœĐ° ĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŽ AKSM-201. УжД ĐžĐŒĐ”ŃŽŃ‰ĐžĐ”ŃŃ Ń„ĐŸŃ‚ĐŸĐłŃ€Đ°Ń„ĐžĐž Ń‚Ń€ĐŸĐ»Đ»Đ”ĐčĐ±ŃƒŃĐŸĐČ, Ń€Đ°Đ·ĐŒĐ”Ń‰Ń‘ĐœĐœŃ‹Đ” Đ·ĐŽĐ”ŃŃŒ, прДЎлагаю Ń€Đ°Đ·ĐŒĐ”ŃŃ‚ĐžŃ‚ŃŒ ĐČ ĐżĐŸĐŽĐșĐ°Ń‚Đ”ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŃ… AKSM-201. I nominate this category for discussion: there is already the AKSM-201 category on Wikimedia Commons, for trolleybuses model 201, designed and built by Belkommunmash. I suggest creating a redirect. I also suggest placing the existing photos of trolleybuses posted here in the subcategories of AKSM-201. ATI1999 (talk) 09:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that Dakotaramp ('Dakota disaster' in Dutch) does not fulfil the Commons category naming rules, because it is not recognisable to English speakers outside the Netherlands. The word Dakotaramp does not appear in English Wikipedia, and so far no-one has created an article about the disaster, although it should be easy to build one from the Dutch Wikipedia article 'Dakotaramp'. I am aware of recent understandable controversy about desecration of the Dakotaramp memorial at Texel, but I think we should proceed to rename the category, perhaps to "1996 DDA DC-3 disaster". PeterWD (talk) 11:08, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated request of mine to older stil discussed Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/02/Category:Clash of civilizations - see that discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Zhang Junheng æșçŸ©äżĄ (talk) 02:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vide. Doublon par rapport Ă  Category:Stoups in Hautes-Alpes Fr.Latreille (talk) 13:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

C'est quoi une chapelle rurale ? A ce qu'il me semble toutes les chapelles des Hautes-Alpes sont rurales ... Fr.Latreille (talk) 13:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the usecase for this category. Jonteemil (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not even categorized. 191.126.166.100 22:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally mistype the author name, it should be Guilherme de Vasconcelos Abreu instead Junglk (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Por qué los bibliotecarios que pasean por aquí buscando IPs para bloquear no hacen lo necesario? 186.172.46.189 15:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Radiojunkie (talk) 07:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to "Chabad Lag Ba'omer parades". The singular "parade" makes the title sound like it covers a single parade, but the contents clearly cover more than one parade. 123.51.107.94 05:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JopkeB? 186.174.165.203 15:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous category. We should delete Category:Heraldic fountains in heraldry in favour of Fountains in heraldry. Broichmore (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection we should lkeep it, the naming of this cat could possibly be changed to something more descriptive? Broichmore (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is the standard heraldic term to differentiate the object from standard fountains.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 21:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lua script error and lots of red link categories Doomhope (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. 186.172.46.189 15:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No redlink categories anymore. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 13:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't seem to be an official, meaningful designation for seven wonders of Karnataka. An Internet search for this term results only in promotional sites, such as travel sites. Auntof6 (talk) 09:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Borrar. "karnataka" no existe. 186.172.46.189 15:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Karnataka exists. It is one of the states of India. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete not commons cat tree's purpose to put them together even if the phrase might exist. RZuo (talk) 14:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Konstruktionsdetails und Statik 91.126.68.98 18:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Was ist das? 191.125.15.22 23:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this empty category be deleted? Ooligan (talk) 18:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this empty category be deleted? Ooligan (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this empty category be deleted? Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this empty category be deleted? Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this empty category be deleted? Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly named, and arguably not needed since Category:Men with penis tattoos exists as well. Adsci8 (talk) 14:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know what to say. I didn't look who created this nonsense but that's not important now. It's more important to find a reliable admin to delete this bullshit. Let me try to call an admin, hopefully the ping sounds without the accent. @Turelio: 191.126.166.100 22:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This category should be removed as it was created by a vandal with the portrait of an unknown man by Cristofano Allori Ecummenic (talk) 08:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This category should be removed as it was created by the vandal "O Correto" with portraits of unknown men Ecummenic (talk) 09:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it's been 4 years. this cat should be deleted. if needed, the files can be listed somewhere, but not in a cat. RZuo (talk) 14:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i suggest separating ethnic and religious slurs into two cats. see Category:Prejudice and discrimination by type for comparison. RZuo (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]