Chinese vs Serbian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Serbian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Serbians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Serbian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,919,157 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Serbians.
Chinese vs Serbian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,087, a difference of 26.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,106, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,572, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,677, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,551, a difference of 0.98%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,975, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $46,551 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $107,157 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Excellent $87,572 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,677 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $57,975 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Excellent $40,539 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $51,106 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $98,320 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Excellent $103,522 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Average $61,087 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chinese vs Serbian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 13.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Excellent 28.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese vs Serbian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chinese vs Serbian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.49%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chinese vs Serbian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Good 30.7% |
Chinese vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Chinese vs Serbian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 61.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chinese vs Serbian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.52%), disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Serbian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |