Chinese vs Portuguese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Portuguese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Portuguese
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Portuguese Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,613,217 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.161% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 1,161.4 Portuguese.
Chinese vs Portuguese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,440, a difference of 26.1%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,976, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $105,309, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,663, a difference of 0.37%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,032, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,177, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Good $44,362 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Excellent $106,286 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $88,976 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,032 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Excellent $56,663 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Good $40,177 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $54,436 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $99,429 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $105,309 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Good $61,440 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chinese vs Portuguese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 17.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Excellent 20.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Fair 12.2% |
Chinese vs Portuguese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 76.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Chinese vs Portuguese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 40.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Fair 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chinese vs Portuguese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 33.8% |
Chinese vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chinese vs Portuguese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.1%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 93.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 92.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 63.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 44.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 35.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Poor 13.9% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Chinese vs Portuguese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Portuguese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Fair 23.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Fair 47.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |