The information in forward rates: Implications for models of the term structure

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90031-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Term-structure models from Cox, Ingersoll, and Ross (1985) imply that conditional expected discrete-period returns on discount instruments are linear functions of forward rates. Tests reject a single-latent-variable model of expected returns on U.S. Treasury bills, but two or three latent variables appear to describe expected returns on bills of all maturities. Expected returns estimated using two-latent-variables exhibit variation with business cycles similar to what Fama (1986) observes for forward rates. Inverted term structures precede recessions and upward-sloping structures precede recoveries.

References (35)

  • Eugene F. Fama

    Term premiums and default premiums in money markets

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1986)
  • Eugene F. Fama

    Term premiums in bond returns

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1984)
  • Eugene F. Fama

    The information in the term structure

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1984)
  • Eugene F. Fama

    Forward rates as predictors of future spot rates

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1976)
  • John Y. Campbell

    Stock returns and the term structure

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1987)
  • Douglas T. Breeden

    Consumption, production, inflation, and interest rates: A synthesis

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1986)
  • Michael J. Brennan et al.

    Conditional predictions of bond prices and returns

    Journal of Finance

    (1980)
  • Cited by (141)

    • The time-varying bond risk premia in China

      2022, Journal of Empirical Finance
    • Time to build and bond risk premia

      2020, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
    • Reexamining time-varying bond risk premia in the post-financial crisis era

      2019, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      After Campbell and Shiller (1991); Fama and Bliss (1987) give a similar result by forecasting yield changes with the Treasury yield spreads. In contrast with them, Stambaugh (1988) forecasts returns with all available yields, rather than with single yields with specific maturities. The CP factor model proposed by Cochrane and Piazzesi (2005) significantly improves the performance of forecasting regressions.

    • A noisy principal component analysis for forward rate curves

      2015, European Journal of Operational Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    I thank Nai-fu Chen, Eugene Fama, Wayne Ferson, Campbell Harvcy, Gur Huberman, Ravi Jagannathan, Krishna Ramaswamy, John Campbell (the referee), René Stulz (the editor), and participants in workshops at the University of Chicago,Duke University, University of Michigan, University of Minnesota, University of Pennsylvania, Vanderbilt University, and National Bureau of Economic Research for helpful discussionsand comments. Financial support was provided by the Center for Research in Security Prices, and much of the research was conducted while the author was a Batterymarch Fellow.

    View full text