Author
Listed:
- Michele Belot
(University of Oxford)
- Marcel Fafchamps
(University of Oxford)
AbstractSome evidence suggests that people behave more pro-socially in small groups than in market-like situations. We construct an experiment in which people choose between allocations that affect their payoff and that of others. The choices of some participants are randomly selected to determine payoffs. We test whether people exhibit different other-regarding preferences depending on how the choice is framed. To mimic a market-like environment, we ask subjects to select a type of partner, either high or low. Selecting a partner of a given type effectively removes this pairing from other players. We compare this treatment to two alternatives where people are first assigned to groups of two high and two low participants. In one treatment, they are then asked to choose between a high and low partner. In the other, they are asked to choose between two payoff allocations for the four individuals. These two treatments make the implication of one's choice on others more salient. We find that most subjects pursue their self-interest, but high payoff participants behave more altruistically in small groups while low payoff participants display more invidious choices in the market-like environment. The implication is that while some efficiency can be achieved in small groups thanks to altruism, a market-like environment reduces good samaritan tendencies, possibly because the negative effect of one's choice on others is less salient.
Suggested Citation
Michele Belot & Marcel Fafchamps, 2012.
"Good Samaritans and the Market: Experimental Evidence on Other-Regarding Preferences,"
Discussion Papers
2012001, University of Oxford, Nuffield College.
Handle:
RePEc:cex:dpaper:2012001
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Charness, Gary & Rabin, Matthew, 2001.
"Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,"
Department of Economics, Working Paper Series
qt4qz9k8vg, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Smith, Adam, 1759.
"The Theory of Moral Sentiments,"
History of Economic Thought Books,
McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number smith1759.
- Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999.
"A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
- Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, "undated".
"A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation,"
IEW - Working Papers
004, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 1999.
"A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation,"
Munich Reprints in Economics
20650, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 1998.
"A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
1812, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Fafchamps, Marcel & Shilpi, Forhad, 2008.
"Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption,"
Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 43-60, April.
- Marcel Fafchamps & Forhad Shilpi & The World Bank, 2006.
"Subjective Welfare, Isolation, and Relative Consumption,"
Economics Series Working Papers
GPRG-WPS-056, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Fafchamps, Marcel & Shilpi, Forhad, 2006.
"Subjective Welfare, Isolation and Relative Consumption,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
6002, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2004.
"Well-being over time in Britain and the USA,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(7-8), pages 1359-1386, July.
- David G. Blanchflower & Andrew J. Oswald, 2000.
"Well-Being Over Time in Britain and the USA,"
NBER Working Papers
7487, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2001.
"Well-Being Over Time in Britain and the USA,"
The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS)
616, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2001.
"Well-Being Over Time in Britain and the USA,"
Economic Research Papers
269386, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
- Steffen Andersen & Glenn W. Harrison & Morten I. Lau & E. Elisabet Rutström, 2008.
"Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 583-618, May.
- Okada, Akira & Riedl, Arno, 2005.
"Inefficiency and social exclusion in a coalition formation game: experimental evidence,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 278-311, February.
- Vernon L. Smith, 1962.
"An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70(3), pages 322-322.
- R. Luce, 2010.
"Behavioral assumptions for a class of utility theories: A program of experiments,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 19-37, August.
- Axel Ockenfels & Gary E. Bolton, 2000.
"ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(1), pages 166-193, March.
- Becker, Gary S, 1973.
"A Theory of Marriage: Part I,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(4), pages 813-846, July-Aug..
- Hoffman, Elizabeth & McCabe, Kevin & Smith, Vernon L, 1996.
"Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 653-660, June.
- Charness, Gary B & Rabin, Matthew, 2001.
"Understanding Social Preferences With Simple Tests,"
University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series
qt0dc3k4m5, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
- Vernon L. Smith, 1998.
"The Two Faces of Adam Smith,"
Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 2-19, July.
- Charness, Gary & Rabin, Matthew, 2002.
"Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,"
Department of Economics, Working Paper Series
qt3d04q5sm, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Samuel Bowles, 1998.
"Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions,"
Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 75-111, March.
- Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2002.
"Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(3), pages 817-869.
- Charness, Gary & Rabin, Matthew, 2001.
"Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,"
Department of Economics, Working Paper Series
qt4qz9k8vg, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Charness, Gary & Rabin, Matthew, 2002.
"Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,"
Department of Economics, Working Paper Series
qt3d04q5sm, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Charness, Gary B & Rabin, Matthew, 2001.
"Understanding Social Preferences With Simple Tests,"
University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series
qt0dc3k4m5, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
- Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2003.
"Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,"
General Economics and Teaching
0303002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Colin F. Camerer & Richard H. Thaler, 1995.
"Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 209-219, Spring.
- H. Peyton Young & Mary A. Burke, 2001.
"Competition and Custom in Economic Contracts: A Case Study of Illinois Agriculture,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 559-573, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Citations
Blog mentions
As found by
EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
- Markets vs morals
by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2012-09-24 18:45:50
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- A. Stefano Caria & Marcel Fafchamps, 2015.
"Can Farmers Create Efficient Information Networks? Experimental Evidence from Rural India,"
CSAE Working Paper Series
2015-07, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
- Margherita Comola & Marcel Fafchamps, 2015.
"An Experimental Study of Decentralized Link Formation with Competition,"
NBER Working Papers
21758, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Fafchamps, Marcel & Belot, Michèle, 2015.
"Good Samaritans and the Market: Experimental Evidence on Other-Regarding Preferences in Partnership Formation,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
11017, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Michèle Belot & Marcel Fafchamps, 2018.
"Are People Equally Other‐Regarding When Selecting a Match Versus Choosing an Allocation?,"
Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(4), pages 1088-1108, April.
- Brandts, Jordi & Riedl, Arno, 2020.
"Market interaction and efficient cooperation,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
- Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2005.
"The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories,"
Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems
66, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
- Thomas, Ranjeeta & Galizzi, Matteo M. & Moorhouse, Louisa & Nyamukapa, Constance & Hallett, Timothy B., 2024.
"Do risk, time and prosocial preferences predict risky sexual behaviour of youths in a low-income, high-risk setting?,"
Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
- Thomas, Ranjeeta & Galizzi, Matteo M. & Moorhouse, Louisa & Nyamukapa, Constance & Hallett, Timothy B., 2024.
"Do risk, time and prosocial preferences predict risky sexual behaviour of youths in a low-income, high-risk setting?,"
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
121013, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Brandts, J. & Riedl, A.M., 2016.
"Market competition and efficient cooperation,"
Research Memorandum
006, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
- He, Haoran & Wu, Keyu, 2016.
"Choice set, relative income, and inequity aversion: An experimental investigation,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 177-193.
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro-Martinez, 2019.
"On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 976-1002, March.
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro Martinez, 2015.
"On the external validity of social-preference games: A systematic lab-field study,"
Economics Working Papers
1462, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Galizzi, Matteo M. & Navarro-Martínez, Daniel, 2019.
"On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study,"
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
84088, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro-Martínez, 2015.
"On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study,"
Working Papers
802, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Dorian Jullien, 2018.
"Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions,"
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on Latin American Monetary Thought: Two Centuries in Search of Originality, volume 36, pages 119-155,
Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Matthew Ellman & Paul Pezanis-Christou, 2010.
"Organizational Structure, Communication, and Group Ethics,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(5), pages 2478-2491, December.
- Bruttel, Lisa & Stolley, Florian, 2020.
"Getting a yes. An experiment on the power of asking,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
- Bruttel, Lisa & Stolley, Florian & Utikal, Verena, 2017.
"Getting a Yes. An Experiment on the Power of Asking,"
MPRA Paper
79140, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Lisa Bruttel & Florian Stolley & Verena Utikal, 2019.
"Getting a Yes: An Experiment on the Power of Asking,"
CEPA Discussion Papers
02, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Guala, Francesco & Mittone, Luigi, 2010.
"Paradigmatic experiments: The Dictator Game,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 578-584, October.
- Croson, Rachel & Gächter, Simon, 2010.
"The science of experimental economics,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 122-131, January.
- Servtka, Maros, 2009.
"Separating reputation, social influence, and identification effects in a dictator game,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 197-209, February.
- Jan Stoop, 2014.
"From the lab to the field: envelopes, dictators and manners,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(2), pages 304-313, June.
- Dorian Jullien, 2016.
"Under Uncertainty, Over Time and Regarding Other People: Rationality in 3D,"
GREDEG Working Papers
2016-20, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
- Eckel, Catherine & Gintis, Herbert, 2010.
"Blaming the messenger: Notes on the current state of experimental economics,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 109-119, January.
- Khan, Hayat, 2009.
"Modeling Social Preferences: A Generalized Model of Inequity Aversion,"
MPRA Paper
14701, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Apr 2009.
- Camerer, Colin F. & Ho, Teck-Hua, 2015.
"Behavioral Game Theory Experiments and Modeling,"
Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,,
Elsevier.
- Falk Armin & Kosfeld Michael, 2012.
"It's all about Connections: Evidence on Network Formation,"
Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 1-36, September.
- Armin Falk, Michael Kosfeld, "undated".
"It's all about Connections: Evidence on Network Formation,"
IEW - Working Papers
146, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Falk, Armin & Kosfeld, Michael, 2003.
"It's all about Connections: Evidence on Network Formation,"
IZA Discussion Papers
777, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Falk, Armin & Kosfeld, Michael, 2003.
"It's All About Connections: Evidence on Network Formation,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
3970, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
More about this item
Keywords
Behavioral experiment;
Social preferences;
Partnership formation;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
- D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
- D64 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
- Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cex:dpaper:2012001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wojtek Przepiorka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nceoxuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.