Happy New Year, Ovinus!
Ovinus,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! Ovinus (talk) 22:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of El Palo Alto
Hello! Your submission of El Palo Alto at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
NPP Award for 2022
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
| For over 100 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) |
DYK for El Palo Alto
On 16 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article El Palo Alto, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the city of Palo Alto, California, is named after a big tree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/El Palo Alto. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, El Palo Alto), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Yelp edits
Hi Ovinus. Thanks for chipping in at Talk:Yelp#Requested_Updates. I wanted to check-in to see if you saw my post asking for a few more edits and if you had time to review/consider them. Let me know and thanks again. Best regards. Alalbrech (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Ovinus, thanks for your work at the above article; have you finished copy-editing it? I ask because the sub-section on the GOCE Requests page still has your working tag on it. If you're finished, please mark the request with either {{done}} or {{partly done}}; if you plan to continue the c/e, please let me know, otherwise I'll mark it "partly done" so someone else can continue the c/e. I'll ensure you get a co-credit in the archives. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 20:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Baffle gab1978: I'm sorry for the total lack of communication (and I think this is the second time this has happened with GOCE). I worked through the article except the Results and History sections. Due to some urgent real-life events I'll need to be offline for maybe a month or two, so please mark it for someone else to review. Again, sorry. Ovinus (talk) 07:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply; no problem, sorry I've only just seen your reply after checking back (I don't see pings). When I checked on 1 February, you were still working on it. Thank you for your work there; I'll post a link to this section at the Requests page and make sure you are co-credited in the archive. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 06:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
GA history
Hi -- not sure if you're planning to go back to the code you wrote to piece together GA history, but I ran into another oddity that is likely to cause problems if you do. See Talk:Staffa; I hadn't realized there were old GA reviews that were simply sections on a talk page. In that case there's articlehistory, but that probably won't always be the case. And it also occurs to me that a few GAs have been deleted, which will also screw things up -- though I would guess most have left redirects behind so that would make them traceable at least. I am starting to think the task may be impossible. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Christie: Yes, it's on the back burner behind school and WP obligations than I really shouldn't have taken on. Thank you for the link. The article is still categorized as a good article, so presumably we could go through discrepancies between the category, and the set of review pages, by hand, and just once. Talk-page-section reviews which ended in a fail, and which no one categorized, would fall through ... but meh, I doubt those are common. Ovinus (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Pi and math
I occasionally come out of hibernation and saw a notification from when you were working on Pi. It is great that it is now a featured article. Geometry guy 22:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
CABG
Thanks for your edits, comments and question on CABG. I am thinking for nominating it for GA. Would you have any advice prior to that? Cinadon36 12:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)