Sundostund

Hi Sundostund i have a problem would you mind if i ask for some help its an issue with 2 articles ?

Friendlyhistorian (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Friendlyhistorian: Please do; I will be glad to help, if I can. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 17:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok so there a person who has removed lifespans from the list of presidents of guatemala . Also he made massive changes to the list of prime ministers of france and articles looks nothing like other lists the issue is GoldRingChip has like 131,999 edits is here much longer than me and i dont want to go and have an edit war and potentially get in trouble. My plan in these cases is usually to just let be and come back a few months later but these time i have been pretty much demoralized here . Is there anything you could do since you are also an experianced editor ? Friendlyhistorian (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

• Sorry! I'll fix it. —GoldRingChip 17:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

• @GoldRingChip: As Friendlyhistorian noted, some of your edits at President of Guatemala and List of prime ministers of France does seem to be illogical and unnecessary, especially the removal of lifespans. It should be restored IMHO, as its obviously a widely accepted element of list of officeholders on English Wikipedia. I see no reason to make a difference in these two cases... Also, there could be some other issues with your version of the French PMs list, but not quite radical as the lifespan issues. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
• @GoldRingChip: Same applies to List of presidents of France, and possibly some other lists that you worked on and that I haven't seen yet. Please, restore lifespans there as well. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 18:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

• • • Frankly I think lots of data could be included as interesting although excessive. And lifespan is just not necessary. Regardless, I shall restore those articles to keep my fellow editors happy. —GoldRingChip 18:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Sundostund! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as City Assembly of Belgrade, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20170621184422/https://www.beograd.rs/en/city-authority/201014-assembly-of-the-city-of-belgrade/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:City Assembly of Belgrade and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en wikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, City Assembly of Belgrade, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:City Assembly of Belgrade. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:City Assembly of Belgrade with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:City Assembly of Belgrade saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Justlettersandnumbers: As can be seen, I have created the article in question (City Assembly of Belgrade) quite some time ago (back in 2018), and at the present time I am really not interested in some serious/comprehensive work on that article. Of course, I can only thank you for your notification, and I can say that if any copyright infringement took place, it was completely unintentional on my part. Naturally, any material that resulted from such infringement should be removed from the article, and replaced with something sourced and acceptable. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 21:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's fine, Sundostund – the article will probably be deleted in a week or so unless someone chooses to rewrite it. The big question, of course, is whether you think that there might be other articles where you've copied content from non-free sources? If so, please mention them here so that they too can be cleaned up. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Justlettersandnumbers: Yes, I understand. Obviously, I wouldn't want to see this article deleted. Same goes for City Assembly of Novi Sad, which is in the same position (but wasn't created by me). I would like to "save" them both, but I honestly have no idea how to rewrite them into something acceptable, with reliable free sources, and without turning it into a mammoth task... and no, I don't remember any other article created by me, that could have the same issue as this one. Naturally, mistakes could happen, but as I said, even this one wasn't intentional at all. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Justlettersandnumbers: Furthermore, I would recommend you to check Zagreb Assembly, City Assembly of the Capital City of Podgorica and City Assembly of Niš for possible copyright infringements. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

(edit conflict) That's fair enough, Sundostund, writing a properly-sourced article is indeed a lot of work – and so is something that to my great regret I hardly ever do any more. I said 'deleted', but it's actually more likely that it will become a redirect to the page on the city; that means that you could write a small amount about it in that page with having to worry whether it meets our notability requirements and so on. If over time that develops sufficiently you'd always be free to split it off into a separate page. And yes, will look at those too. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.

Useful links

• All template-protected pages
• User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
• Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! Primefac (talk) 08:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm doing a project on Userboxes, and I send you some questions over email :)

 

Hello, Sundostund. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Lucasorigami (talk) 23:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sundostund, I send you another email!

 

Hello, Sundostund. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Lucasorigami (talk) 13:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

	Serbian Sandbox
	Good start for the sandbox. If I could help I would, but that's for you to approve. Tvoj zločinac iz Srbije, Overthrow-dictator (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Overthrow-dictator: I'm not sure if you are talking about this sandbox? Anyway, I surely do appreciate your offer! Please help with it if you can/want, but honestly that's quite a stalled project at this point. Its been some years since I started it. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yea, that's the one i'm talking about. Anyways, thanks for allowing me.

Tvoj zločinac iz Srbije, Overthrow-dictator (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Sundostund; Go look at it now and tell me what you think. I cleaned it and updated it with new images as well.

Tvoj zločinac iz Srbije, Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Overthrow-dictator: Its looks quite fine, I don't have some objections. Thank you for displaying interest in it, and helping out! — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 12:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that, and no problem. I like helping out with these types of things. Also, how do you do signatures?

Tvoj zločinac iz Srbije, Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Overthrow-dictator: You can change your default-looking signature at Preferences; its not hard at all if you want to create a customized (personalized) signature. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 13:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welp, I did it. How is it? (color is from the Serbian Radical Party) Overthrow-dictator ^{(talk / contribs)} 13:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Overthrow-dictator: Yes, you got it - and rather quickly, to be honest! I'm glad because of that, but I can't say that I like how you got the idea for that color; I'm def not a SRS voter myself. Still, if that's your (political) position, than fine... I myself am associated with green color around here for some time now (not just because of Green politics), so that's why I use green color for my signature as well. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 13:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a voter for the СРС, I just think the color is cool. My color is red, but it didn't look as good as this. If we're getting political, my (personal) party I would vote for would be the СДСС in Croatia, as I like their ideological views. Anyways, yea, thanks for all! Overthrow-dictator ^{(talk / contribs)} 13:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi

Please could you advise him to stop this vandalism? Panam2014 (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to Mullah Omar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. TEMPO156 (talk) 21:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@TEMPO156: I am sorry, but the image in question (File:Mullah Omar in 1993.png) wasn't uploaded by me at all; I just added it to certain articles, as something that already existed at the Commons. Obviously, all material that violates copyright policies should be removed, including this image. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sundostund, I send you another message with some questions regarding Userboxes.

 

Hello, Sundostund. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Lucasorigami (talk) 11:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for signing my guestbook!

    20:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sundostund i am sorry for bothering you . May i ask for help ? i have dispute with the a user named Skjoldbro we been arguing about election positioning its been a back and forth . Now He has left messages on the talk page of another article and the wikiproject politics . Can you help me trying to get him to talk on either his talk page or mine and help us solve the dispute . Friendlyhistorian (talk) 12:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Friendlyhistorian: In all honesty, I am very reluctant to get myself involved in disputes, of almost all kinds, or to participate in disputes of other editors. I can only reccomend to both you and Skjoldbro to discuss your differences and find some compromise, as any sort of edit-warring would only make the problem deeper and/or result in blocks. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 17:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok no worries i just see you are an authority on lists but no worries . Take care and happy editing . Also something unrealted would you mind if i asked a few questions about editing later at some point  ? Friendlyhistorian (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Friendlyhistorian: Well, thanks for that. I could be called an authority on lists, but on disputes... no thanks. And of course, I will be glad to hear your questions. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 18:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2018 disestablishments in Chad indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 01:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm trying to improve List of presidents of Burundi to FL status. I'll be nominating it as soon as I can. To that end, I noticed that you reverted some of the changes that I've done to the list. To avoid an edit war, I'll explain why a couple of your reversions should be undone

1. [1] Every row is supposed to have one unique cell known as the header cell. This is denoted by the "!" at the beginning and it has "scope=col".
2. [2] tables are supposed to have captions. This caption can be set to be visible for screen-readers only, if it deemed appropriate to not show them normally.

If you agree with me, then please undo those reversions. If not, we can discuss it further and I can point to the relevant sections of the MOS. Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MPGuy2824: Hi. I wasn't aware that you are trying to improve the list to FL status, and I wouldn't want to interfere with that. Actually, I've just formatted List of presidents of Rwanda the same way as you did with the Burundian list... Anyway, I think that I corrected the issues you had with my reversions. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 08:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing those two issues. Are you interested in bringing one of the list articles that you've started to FL status? It might be a bit harder for the Rwanda one, since some reviewers prefer FL nominations of lists with at least 10 entries. Anyway, if you are interested, I'm happy to either work on a list together with you, or give you pointers on improving a list that you work on yourself. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MPGuy2824: You're welcome... And yes, of course, I am interested in bringing some of them to FL status, but I doubt that I could dedicate myself to such work at this time. As for the Rwandan list, I formatted it the same way as the Burundian list for the sake of certain consistency – having in mind close historical and political relations between the two countries – not really because I aimed for FL status for it (although it woudl certainly be nice if that happen). — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 08:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I doubt that I could dedicate myself to such work at this time. It isn't as hard or as time-consuming as one would think. Choose a similar head of state list. I'd be happy to give you as many pointers as needed for that, and you can take as long as needed (months, even) before nomination. Even after nomination, there is a lot of leeway in how long you take to fix issues and respond. I would really encourage you to try one. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MPGuy2824: I meant that I want to focus on some different kind of work at this time; recently I wasn't as much active on WP as I wanted to anyway, so I'd want to focus on some other things (not to mention real life commitments). Thank you very much for your offer of help! I'll certainly have it on my mind, at some later point. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 11:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply