Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NRK Urørt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
MarioSoulTruthFan has been saying Everything I Wanted is not even close to GA. You and I have spent hours looking up resources and improving the article and this user still says it sucks. I am quite upset tbh. DarklyShadows (talk)
- @DarklyShadows: I lowkey agree that it's not just ready for GA, but it definitely doesn't "suck" at all! It has so much potential and I can definitely see it as a GA in the next two months. We must give it a little bit more effort, as well as input from other editors (please invite users who you think would be interested). Don't let this get you down, you're a really good editor! I'll let you know when I personally think that it's ready for a third nomination :) heyitsben!! talk 18:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Coolmarc is reviewing it and pointed out issues that need to be fixed. I fixed them and told him I was ready but then Mario came and told him it's not ready. I told Mario and you and I spent hours on end looking for reliable references and improving the article. This is what he said: "Now its not a quick fail, when you added for GA nomination the second time, it still was. The vast majority of the improvements should be made before the nomination, not after." DarklyShadows (talk)
I noticed we've remained only two in this WikiProject. However, I'm very confident more people will join as time passes. I will most probably expand/clean-up some of her lower-importance articles (such as album tracks etc) and nominate them to GA. Just wanted to let you know. Hope you're doing great and greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- @Cartoon network freak: Yeah, I think our other editor got a little frustrated about their previously failed nominations. I highly recommend that you invite users who you think would be interested and would help out extensively. I think that right now we must do all we can to prepare Xanny for GA because it definitely has potential and it is still awaiting review. Once that is done I will be completely able to help you clean/expand the album tracks etc. Have a nice weekend :) heyitsben!! talk 08:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- So... I have rewritten "Xanny" for the most part, and I think its writing alone would qualify for GA status. However, it's pretty obvious that the article's content is very unprofound and shallow. Its expansion has been rushed, and this is a major problem when it comes down to GA status. Even at first glance, there is significantly more that could be added to this. Personally, I think we should remove the GA nomination, at least before the entire article is thoroughly expanded. Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- @Cartoon network freak: I completely agree with you! Is there a way we can "postpone" the nomination? If not, I don't mind removing the nomination and re-doing it once it's ready. 10:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Wikipedia offers no possibility to postpone anything, so the only option left is to remove the nomination for now. The article—as it stands now—could possibly be even promoted, but I would personally feel bad if it would be. As said, there is so much more that needs to/could be added. I brought "Bad Guy" and "Bury a Friend" to GA before, and I truly realized how big Billie's media coverage is (including on her WWAFAWDWG tracks). I removed the nom for now. I'll probably find time to expand the article soon, though, and renominate. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Nevermind, I actually found time to expand and further clean-up the article today. I also renominated. Let me know what you think. Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- @Cartoon network freak: It looks so amazing! I really hope it gets to GA status. Thank you so so much :) heyitsben!! talk 10:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
On 28 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mooo!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in her self-made music video for "Mooo!", Doja Cat (pictured) raps in front of a green screen that alternates between cartoon GIFs of food, farms, and bouncing anime breasts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mooo!. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mooo!), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
A tag has been placed on Danielle Cohn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Cohn. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for uploading File:Bakar - Hell n Back screenshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
- On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello, HeyitsBen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NRK Urørt".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello, HeyitsBen
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Robert McClenon, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Jucee Froot, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click the Publish changes button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Robert McClenon}}
. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Robert McClenon, Jucee Froot meets clause 5 and 10 of WP:MUSICBIO, but I must stress the latter since she has performed a solo track for the Birds of Prey (soundtrack) which has its own article and was somewhat commercially successful. HeyitsBen talk 06:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi there. It looks like you tried to give Plain (Benee song) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. If you wish to reply, please do so here. Thank you. Ss112 22:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Body (Megan Thee Stallion song) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
- HeyitsBen, you really need to take care of this; if you don't add this to the nominations page, no reviewer will find it and eventually it will be closed as abandoned. If you need any help, ping me and I'll be happy to assist with that step. Alternatively, if you don't want to proceed with the nomination, you can tag the page with the db-g7 template as noted above. Thank you very much for taking care of this. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
- BlueMoonset, I added my nom and did QPQ. So sorry for the delay. HeyitsBen talk 12:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello Ben! I just wanna let you know that I highly appreciate your work on Wikipedia. You have really came through for a lot of topics on here and I am also in love with the articles you did for my girls Ashnikko, Rico Nasty and Doja Cat. You truly are top tier to me with your edits and I actually came to not only congratulate you on your successful contributions to Wikipedia but ask you to do me this favor... can you please improve the article "Love" by my favorite singer Keyshia Cole for me. I have actually chosen to start working on articles from her first three eras and I have started working on the article for her The Way It Is debut album on my sandbox and I plan to improve articles for the singles released for the album though I really want someone to give extreme improvements to the article for her most best song in her discography which is "Love" and after looking at the articles you have improved and your latest edits I can tell you are the right person for it. It's okay if you will not do it though since most editors like you are pretty busy though I highly recommend a user like you to improve that article and I would do it myself but I do not feel like I am at a high editing level yet and I feel I might make it look... eh. Overall, have a great rest of the week and stay positive, xoxo! Tease Pillar (contributions) • (let's chat) 04:33, December 1, 2020 (UTC)
- Tease Pillar, Hey! Thanks for the kind words. I'll take a look and see what I can do. Have a nice weekend Xxx HeyitsBen talk 12:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
On 5 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Body (Megan Thee Stallion song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in "Body", Megan Thee Stallion name-drops animal-rights activist Carole Baskin, who had previously criticized the rapper's use of big cats as props in a music video? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Body (Megan Thee Stallion song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Body (Megan Thee Stallion song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Where is there a "word" count associated with C-class? Generally it's about number of sections and number of (relevant) sourcing. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- IJBall, what I'm trying to imply is that its such a small article that there isn't even enough content to judge or determine what type (A, B or C) of article it is. If you compare Olivia Rodrigo to other C-class articles like 2 Chainz and Anitta (singer), it doesn't even come close in that regard. Not to mention the refs simply titled "Archived copy", the unsourced record-signing claims and the shallowness in general. I think we should wait for more to happen in her career; then we can expand the article to express this and ultimately have enough content to hopefully fulfil "C-class". HeyitsBen talk 19:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- I'm not sure I agree. (I've written up on this topic for myself – User:IJBall/Assessment.) We can clean up the refs, if that's all that's needed. But it's worth remembering that Rodrigo doesn't just have a music career – she also has a substantive acting career. So she's already a "two-career" bio, which puts her ahead of a lot of WP:BLPs. Anyway, I think this article is now past 'Start' class at this point – 'Start' articles are pretty bare-bones, really. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- IJBall, you make a good point. Go ahead I guess. HeyitsBen talk 07:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- If you like, we can try to solicit the opinion of other editors on the Talk page, or ask for a third-party assessment from WP:BIOG/A. The latter may be the most "fair" solution. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- IJBall, I don't think it's such a big deal. Keep it on C-class for now. HeyitsBen talk 14:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello Ben! I've just read this news article about Arlo Parks (something that I think was originally sourced from The Telegraph?), and wanted to swing by with a couple cautionary thoughts about Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
Last June, you added Arlo's full name to her Wikipedia biography based on two rather obscure sources, both of which violated WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY. Less specifically, I would highlight the following sentences from the policy's introductory paragraphs:
Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity [...] Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy.
Unfortunately, there is not much that can be done today as Parks' full name has now appeared in multiple secondary sources. However, I would encourage you to re-read our BLP policy so that similar situations can be avoided in the future. Thanks, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- The ed17, thank you for messaging me about this. This is actually the second or third time I've been involved in a situation like this in the past few months so I am now very well familiar with this clause of WP:BLP. I will make sure not to violate it in future. HeyitsBen talk 08:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks, Ben! Best, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi HeyitsBen, I recently nominated Hot Pink (album) for GA status and it received a review! Over the past two or three days, I've been doing all the fixes that were requested in the review, and so far I've gotten from the "Infobox-lead" section to the middle of the "singles" section. However, recently I've been wikibonked and I'm not very motivated to make those fixes right now. So I was wondering if you could help me complete the fixes! Thank you, versacespace (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, Hot Pink has a lot of potential. I will most definitely complete the fixes and even expand the article even more. I'm currently super busy with my studies but I will get to it as soon as I can! HeyitsBen talk 09:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @VersaceSpace:, hey bestie lol sorry its been a while, but I'm still taking you up on this GA offer if you're keen :) I should be finished with my expansion in the next 24 hours, and then hopefully we can re-submit with both of us credited? HeyitsBen talk 14:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @HeyitsBen: sounds good to me. Should we still go off the og review for additional fixes or should we wait for the new one? versacespacetalk to me 15:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, give me about an hour or two and then I'll be able to decide lmao. HeyitsBen talk 15:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- HeyitsBen need more time? no rush :) versacespacetalk to me 15:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, done now! Give it a read through :) HeyitsBen talk 18:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- HeyitsBen it's good! There might be some bits of original research, but you did a great job expanding the article. versacespacetalk to me 20:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, thank you. Did you take note of any of my original research so we can remove it or cite it? Do you wanna re-nominate the article for GA or should I? HeyitsBen talk 06:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace ... is it ok if I go on with the nomination without you? HeyitsBen talk 16:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- HeyitsBen hey, I was about to wrap up checking the article, but you can do whatever you'd like. versacespacetalk to me 16:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just adding a notice here to say I responded to you on Commons, since I don't know if pinging works there. Thanks :) versacespacetalk to me 12:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, hey sorry it took me a while to get back to you about this and Hot Pink too. Usually when I'm looking for pictures I go to YouTube and do a normal search query but then I click "Filter" and select "Creative Commons", so it will only show the videos whch the uploaders have chosen to put under the CC-BY-3.0 license. To double-check, you can click "SHOW MORE" in the video description (e.g. on most MTV International videos like this one) and right at the bottom it will say "Licence: Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)".
- Once you've got the screenshot of the video you can upload it to the Commons, but instead of saying "This file is my own work" which is what you did, select "This file is not my own work" and then state the "Source" (link to vid) and "Author" (YouTube channel) and then right at the bottom select "Another reason not mentioned above" and then type {{YouTube}} and {{LicenseReview}}.and then carry on with the normal file upload process :) HeyitsBen talk 18:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
- It's alright! Thanks for informing me. versacespacetalk to me 18:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi! The reviewer has completed the review at Hot Pink. I've completed multiple sections of the review and intend to do more later. I hope you check out the review and aid me in doing so! Best of luck to the both of us. versacespaceleave a message! 02:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Yes of course! So so sorry I’ve been slacking on that... I’ve been super busy this week. Let me do the references and general comments sections and then I’ll take it off hold once I’m done. HeyitsBen talk 06:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- No worries! I understand. I did the things I'm best at and, since I'm not good at source editing and wiki-markup, I'm gonna leave that to whoever's best at it. I'd say about 75% of the review is finished. versacespaceleave a message! 12:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, so what's next? Do we just wait? Because she's clearly been online lol. HeyitsBen talk 07:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @HeyitsBen: who should we ask in a situation like this? versacespaceleave a message! 20:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, I actually have no idea. Maybe we should once again kindly ask the reviewer but this time via her talk page? If she doesn't respond to that I hope that someone will hopefully come along seeing that our nom is now (unfortunately) listed here, and then do something about it...
- Also, on another note, I'm considering pushing Say So (Doja Cat song) to GA status in the next week or so of holiday that I have. I was thinking there's a lot of potential there (as well as Boss Bitch and Streets) and we should push it before Planet Her era properly starts. Do you wanna do it with me? HeyitsBen talk 10:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- certainly! are we pushing to make hot pink a good topic? versacespaceleave a message! 11:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, yes of course! What I meant to say is that while Hot Pink is being reviewed/on hold... we can start expanding and improving Say So so that we can nominate it once Hot Pink is (hopefully) promoted. HeyitsBen talk 11:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- sounds good! versacespaceleave a message! 11:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, ok nice we did it joe! do you have any DYK hook ideas? HeyitsBen talk 16:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- I'm thinking about using the fact that she named the album "hot pink" because (enter reason). what about you? versacespaceleave a message! 16:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- VersaceSpace, I was thinking the same thing but then I realized that naming your album after your favourite colour isn't soooo interesting. What about the fact that during its recording she quit weed bc it didn't help her "perceive what was going on musically" OR that she described HP as a firm restart for her career and the most "refined, chiselled" representation of herself? HeyitsBen talk 16:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- ooh also I don't know how to phrase this but the fact that it became known for producing sleeper hits using this source (Say So #1 in 2020 and Streets top 20 in 2021)? HeyitsBen talk 16:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- I like the marijuana one and it's likely to attract some clicks too, even though that's besides the point. If you'd like, we could do that one. versacespaceleave a message! 17:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Kirsten Goss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirsten Goss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Acousmana 14:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello/Hallo/Sawubona/Molo Ben✌️
I just wanna know why you took WCHH in Doja Cat's see also section😎 before I edit it back fellow South African🙂 Yikes2004 (talk) 17:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Yikes2004, hey! To put it simply, nowhere in the article does it say that Doja Cat performs in the West Coast hip hop genre, and no one has ever described her as a "west coast hip hop" artist. Unless you can provide a reliable source that claims that, you can't yet add it to the "See also" section. Compare Doja's article to that of Eazy-E's which immediately in the lead describes him as "an American rapper, songwriter, record producer, and entrepreneur who propelled West Coast rap". Just because she is from the West Coast and performs hip hop doesn't mean she was part of the West Coast hip hop movement like the legends such as Dr. Dre, Eazy-E, Ice Cube, Tupac Shakur etc. Hope that makes sense. HeyitsBen talk 18:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I fully understand🙃😘
Anyway Doja is a legend in the making✌️ Yikes2004 (talk) 21:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
On 3 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kiss Me More, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Kiss Me More" interpolates the melody from "Physical" by Olivia Newton-John? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kiss Me More. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kiss Me More), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
On 27 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hot Pink (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Doja Cat stopped smoking marijuana while recording Hot Pink, and discovered that her songwriting improved significantly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hot Pink (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hot Pink (album)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
On 28 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Planet Her, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by naming her album Planet Her, Doja Cat was "just trying to be cute" and was not promoting a feminist agenda nor a planet exclusively for women? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Planet Her. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Planet Her), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Cybertrip. Regarding the article Nicki Minaj, since it is according western media and NME, not global, doesn't it fit better the fourth paragraph? Seeking consistency and using as examples of neutrality other articles like Bruno Mars, Beyoncé, and Rihanna. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Cornerstonepicker, I see your point but I don’t think so. Most of the people who read English Wikipedia are English-speaking westerners or at least dip their feet in that pool (I can’t find the essay to prove that but there is one). I think that the way it is now is good bc almost all of these readers can identify and distinguish the relevance, impact and relation of Minaj within their world specifically. If the whole world had to only read English Wikipedia then I would say yes maybe it belongs in the fourth paragraph, but of course, there are 80+ worldwide Wikipedia articles titled Nicki Minaj for a reason. —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 22:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- My other point is-that being the opening introduction. Look at Bruno Mars' article: his name, occupation, and what he's known for art-wise. And just like the other articles, is the fourth paragraph the ones that call them "the best selling..." Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
I noticed your recent edit to Planet Her does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! BawinV (talk) 13:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Cybertrip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:If I Could Make It Go Quiet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Cybertrip: Hi! I just wanted to follow up on your vote on the Cardi B RfC? I implemented your suggestion to improve on it being less like a "list of achievements" in the rewrite; what are your thoughts? Feel free to message me with a reply. Thanks! shanghai.talk to me 08:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- RogueShanghai, I just edited the lead (once and for all) the way I would write it, but I personally wish to not dabble in doing so anymore, since I prefer to edit articles that I have somewhat an interest and experience in. No hard feelings <3 (PS. Please turn your e-mails on) —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 15:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @Cybertrip: Thanks! I promptly turned my emails on, so I'd love to communicate with you off-wiki personally. I'll email you first using the MediaWiki function, toodles! shanghai.talk to me 02:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Hello Cybertrip, me and many other editors and Administrators have noticed RogueShanghai's problematic behavior to Cardi B's article—one Admin suggesting the user should be banned. The user openly dislikes her [3], while promoting Nicki Minaj at any cost (the user has 4 reports on ANI for both things). the RFC is still open. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @Cornerstonepicker: This is the third time you've hounded me on Wikipedia; this constitutes WP:HOUNDING and serious harassment. In the diff you linked, I never said I disliked Cardi B or hated her; so that's an accusation that you keep attributing to me even though I have not said it; one of those ANI reports used sockpuppet IPs to revert my edits, and another entry was made by you while another ANI discussion was going on, which was called by someone else as disruptive. The proposed Cardi B RfC lead does not even have any negative information; it still keeps all the important achievements (grammy win, hot 100 number ones) so the way you talk about it as if I'll make Cardi B look bad whne my proposed lead still highlights her as a very successful female rapper is confusing. You seemingly have been hostile and aggressive in hounding me on Wikipedia; please stop. shanghai.talk to me 03:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Cybertrip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Happier Than Ever: A Love Letter to Los Angeles".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 23:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
it's been checks notes over a year since we last spoke! I took a very long wikibreak which basically took the length of a whole school year...but i'm back and in motion! I see you've been on a bit of a break as well, but when you come back, we need to collab on something. I think we're long overdue for a featured article candidacy tbh. But like, seriously, we'd be unstoppable together. --VersaceSpace 🌃 05:33, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- @VersaceSpace: Welcome back! Although I'm still in my final year of school (*groan*), I check in here almost daily but I feel too lazy to edit anything lol. I'm so keen to get into my FA bag w you. We truly would be unstoppable! —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 09:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- School comes first always, of course. School ended for me a couple weeks ago and I've been back in my WP bag ever since. I just got WAP to GA status and I'm looking into FA next. Dial me up when you're finished with your studies. --VersaceSpace 🌃 01:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- See Talk:Need to Know (Doja Cat song)/GA1 for requested fixes before the article can reach GA status. I've fixed some things but there's a few sourcing problems which I think you're better suited to fix (you did expand the article, after all). —VersaceSpace 🌃 21:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- @VersaceSpace: I’m out the whole day today but I’ll get to them ASAP tomorrow :) —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 08:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
- That's fine! Any point this week will work. —VersaceSpace 🌃 13:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Ben, long time no see. I was wondering if it would be possible to start a discussion on changing back Doja Cat's lead image to the Vogue Taiwan one? Major respect for getting the 2021 Planet Her pic certified and in the article, but imo it kind of suffers from being a picture taken with a phone, with the lower resolution and grainy quality. Interested to hear your perspective on this since you were the one who uploaded the 2021 performance pic in the first place. Thanks! -Shanghai rogueshanghaichat (they/them) 08:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Bringing it to Good article status w/ you was a pleasure, and I was wondering if we could do something more with it :). LMK what you think —VersaceSpace 🌃 01:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
- @VersaceSpace: mm as cool as that sounds, I highly doubt HP has enough sources and content to be stretched and milked into FA territory, largely bc it didn’t have a massive rollout from the start and has so few reviews. I would however suggest Say So or Planet Her. What do you think? —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 14:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Actually, the reason I asked about Hot Pink was because of the lack of things to write about, if that makes sense. I held an FAC for WAP (song) and it failed largely because of the broadness criteria. Hot Pink wouldn't suffer from that because there isn't a ton to say. I don't see a need to stretch out the content more than it has been, besides perhaps the critical reception. Planet Her and "Say So" will require large overhauls, but I'm willing to work on them if you are. —VersaceSpace 🌃 16:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
- I think using Alicia (album) as sort of a template would be a good idea, if you're into the idea of pursuing HP —VersaceSpace 🌃 16:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
thank you for worrying about editing the FLO page. but you don't have to reverse things that have been done before. It's not the first time... if you want to edit something, please add extra information some source, but do not delete or modifyif you want to edit something, please add extra information some source, but do not delete or modify. xoxo Silencedoc (talk) 22:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Hello Silencedoc, I'm not understanding what you mean by "add extra information some source" — could you please elaborate? As a huge fan of FLO, I'm totally on your side here so please assume good faith, and so I would not like to start an WP:EDITWAR with you. However, I insist that the FLO page should be structured the same way as any other musician, and so the chart positions should be listed in the discography (and not just the Cardboard Box article), and the awards table should look like every other awards table such as those under WP:FL#Music. Can I ask why you are not following the usual WP:MOS, and are deleting my sourced edits which provide useful information? —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 11:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
you can't even start a WP:EDITWAR. can I consider this as a threat? I understand that your edits are in good faith, but it is not a strict rule that everyone is bound to follow. there are several other similar pages, and no other editor wanted to modify them to the "default" template. if you notice, many people have already edited in FLO and you're the only person who keeps editing the same things. how about a talk page? Silencedoc (talk) 14:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
the only chart that was in New Zealand is not even useful information... if you look closely at the other pages of musicians, you will realize that the vast majority do not follow this model that you insist. Silencedoc (talk) 14:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
while the "awards and nominations" is also not a mandatory rule, again I understand that their editions are in good faith. but there are also several other pages, including famous ones, that do not even follow alphabetically. as said A LOT before, my editing was in chronological and alphabetical order. xoxo Silencedoc (talk) 14:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I'm planning on nominating Nia Archives for GA - possibly a fool's errand, given that she's got an album out in the next week and there's a good chance this could destabilise in the interim, but I should probably write a few GAs before I reattempt Piri at FA. Do you see anything glaring?--Launchballer 10:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply