User talk:Leighmullin

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mojo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Edison (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding that a Mojo is "a 1p sweety remembered by Stuart Wright" did not improve the article. Many readers would not have any idea what you meant by a "1p sweety" and why do you think the reminiscences of "Stuart Wright" satisfy the need for verifiability. Your edit appeared to be vandalism or a test edit, and it was reverted as such. If you can find a book or article in a reliable source which backs up your edit, please feel free to add it with the reference. You could try searching at Google Books and at Google News archive advanced search for references about the particular candy in question. There does appear to have been one or more types of candy sold under that name, but it is not clear they could be bought for 1 cent (US) or one penny (UK or elsewhere). Did you refer to these "Tom's Soft & Chewy Mojo Banana Flavour Chews? See also Strawberry, Cola flavour) They exist but are they notable enough for an article, which is the reason they would be placed on a disambiguation page. 300 for £7.29 prices them a little beyond penny candy. Thanks. Edison (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a promising search of the news archive, for Mojo chews: [1]. Not much in the newspapers, and only directory listings among books. So the candy satisfies verifiability, not notability is the question. Tangerine Confectionery of Blackpool is the UK confectionery company which makes Mojo chews, and they are already listed in that article. What i now suggest is to add Mojo chews to the Mojo disambiguation page with a piped link to the Tangerine Confectionery article, like: Mojo chews . Do you wish to do the honors or shall I? And I have struck through my vandalism/test edit warning, since yours was a good-faith edit. Edison (talk) 22:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts with four tildes like ~~~~. Comparisons of someone's behavior to Nazi Germany, such as the comment you made on my talk page, is always a losing approach at Wikipedia. Keeping various types of vandalism, test edits, nonsense, vanity autobiographies, and spam links out of articles is an activity which occupies hundreds or thousands of editors and administrators many hours each per week to keep out vandalism, vanity articles, spam links, advertisements, and lame attempts at humor, so that Wikipedia is a referenced and accurate encyclopedia, and not Uncyclopedia. Note that my user name is Edison. Edison (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to the Mojo article, under "Other" which mentions Mojo chews and directed to the Tangerine Confectionery article. (If you think the time spent on this issue was a screaming time waster, it did have its use in avoiding some real-world chores. But to see how much time can be spent debating seeming trivialities, take a look at Articles for deletion). Edison (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leighmullin (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC) thank you, my reference to Germany (i didn't mention nazi, but the reference was there) was purely because I felt my honest views were being edited. I respect your job.[reply]

Many like me are unpaid volunteers trying to keep this an encyclopedia and not a graffiti wall. You might also find Wikipedia:Reference desk interesting, where questions about literally anything are asked and answered. Edison (talk) 03:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, I could go for a large handful of those fruit flavored chews. Certainly at 1 cent a piece. Edison (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dark Matter / Dark Energy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 16:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Leighmullin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl oh hello! 16:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

See WP:Notability (albums) for requirements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dark Matter / Dark Energy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Leighmullin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dark Matter / Dark Energy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leighmullin. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Dark Energy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]