www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:Geraldo Perez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Marino13[edit]

What would this be reported under or given a warning [1]. Also seems to be using another user in the summary as well. I reverted some of her edits on the Thundermans as it wasn't broke [2], [3] and seems to be going under cover with ip's reverting edits on the Alexa Nikolas page [4] as well having issues editing now and in the past. Including attacking a former user [5]. All edits have been reverted, but not really sure what warning to give or bring this issue to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Thanks Magical Golden Whip (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magical Golden Whip: That recent edit at The Thundermans looks like a subtle personal attack on you at the very least (referring to the June 15 edit in particular), and this should be reported to ANI if they continue with this kind of behavior of disrupting articles just to inject personal attacks or the like in edit summaries. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked at the diff from their user page as well. Definitely a sneaky type of personal attack with those wikilinks. Worth a warning, and if they continue, ANI. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I found the warning for personal attacks and gave then a one time warning as the next time I will take up with ANI. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Magical Golden Whip: Based on that edit summary, as well as others, this also seems to be WP:HARRASMENT at this point, and possibly WP:STALKING, with the intention of causing trouble. Some of their edits are along the lines of, "How long until MGW reverts this?" To me, that seems like some sort of personal vendetta against you, that they're butthurt, for lack of a better phrase, over being reverted that they're possibly now just making problematic edits to feel special or for attention. This initially started when they reverted an edit on Alexa Nikolas by our colleague IJBall, who unfortunately no longer contributes here, from well over a year ago. It seems odd to me that someone would go through the trouble of remembering something for that long and, for whatever reason, decide to revert well over a year later. It's long overdue at this point, but now that they've received another warning, if they make one more problematic, I recommend going ahead and filing a report at either WP:ANEW or WP:ANI, as they've also been slow-motion edit warring. However, since it's more than just that, ANI would probably be the better option, where the edit warring can also be mentioned. Amaury19:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have previously reported Marino13 at WP:ANI and administrators did not see it as personal attacks. It was the opposite as they started defending him saying things like "you cannot be mad at a 13-year-old kid" and similar. – sbaio 04:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like i said before: "only trying to help out guys, sheesh" And making me look like a joke in the process. FYI SBaio, I don't appreciate the snooping! Marino13 (talk) 03:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Sjones23[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pinocchio (1940 film) § Plot. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]