User talk:Drivedigitalmedia

Thank you for uploading File:Luhr Tucker Reay Westbrook.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rolex 55 Car.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a few moments to create a new account with a username that represents only you. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may ask for a review of this username block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message. Thank you. - Dank (push to talk) 00:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a company account for Drivedigitalmedia.com. - Dank (push to talk) 00:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drivedigitalmedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We have been asked by representatives of Scott Tucker to remove his page. This cannot be done if we are blocked. Thank you.

Decline reason:

If you want, we'll delete your user page. However, Scott Tucker (racing driver) is a legitimate Wikipedia article, and will not be deleted without cause. Please familiarize yourself with our conflict of interest guidelines to understand why we don't accept people editing on behalf of themselves, their businesses, their organizations, or their clients. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, from the contents of your user page, it is apparent ("ZVE NOTE" and "BG NOTE") that this account is being used by more than one person, a practice that is not allowed on Wikipedia. —DoRD (?) (talk) 18:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Scott Tucker (racing driver), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Tucker (racing driver). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as you are currently blocked, if you have anything to add to the discussion you can add it here and it will be copied to the AFD. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]