Hello, Cbarness63, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 15:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to MK Ultra, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Uri Geller, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Church of Scientology, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please keep in mind that first-hand experience must still be verifiable. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 09:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Cbarness63. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mission Into Time".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Planning of the September 11 attacks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please restrict your conspiracy theories to one of the many sites on the internet and not to this encyclopedia. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I did and do believe that they require extraordinary evidence, as opposed to no evidence. Do you believe that you are "above" fulfilling the requirement that reliable sources be cited?--Quisqualis (talk) 21:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]