User talk:Bsoyka

Welcome! Here are just three simple things to keep in mind here: Be nice! I'm a human, and you probably are too. I don't expect every message to be a compliment, but let's keep it civil. If you're here to vandalize this page or attack me, it's not worth your time and your edits will be reverted. To get a response, be civil. Sign your messages. Just add four tildes to the end of each message (~~~~). Email me for sensitive matters. If you wouldn't want everyone on the Internet to see a message, please don't add it here.

Please note that you are not currently logged in.

This is not a general problem – you can leave a message anyway, but your IP address will be exposed and might change during the discussion. Creating an account does not require an e-mail address; all you need is a password and a name. You are not required to, but please consider creating an account before starting long-term interactions with other users. Thank you in advance!

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article.

My guestbook

Feel free to add a message at User:Bsoyka/Guestbook! Hi Bsoyka, nice to see you around. ϢereSpielChequers 20:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for your help today with the typo I found which needed editing. I did look around for some sort of edit on the page itself, and didn't see it, but will look harder next time. Take care, justsaynoemore(returns) ;) Justsaynoemorereturns (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:44, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply] Glad to see another fellow Wikipedian supporting the guestbook cause History DMZ (HQ) † (wire) 21:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thanks so much for your help with my bad batch expertise. You helped me understand the need for communication between two experts (me and you) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puppies$Toasters999 (talk • contribs) 06:36, June 30, 2021 (UTC) Hello! Huggums537 Vote! (Guest🖋️book) or (Suggestion🗳️box)? 01:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] @Bsoyka: Hi. Its nice to see you are still active! —usernamekiran (talk) sign the (guestbook) 09:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] Awesome header navbox thing Bsoyka ~TNT (talk • she/her) 01:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Nice... Let's keep this going Volten001 ☎ 06:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] Thank you! 𝕿𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖉𝖞𝖗  Talk 01:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply] QueenofHearts 22:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]  Done! Hello there! — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 07:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report Our 2023 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Introduction Membership news, obituary and election results Summary of Drives, Blitzes and the Requests page Closing words – Your Guild coordinators: Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery (talk • contribs) 21:24, March 16, 2024 (UTC)

Getting anywhere on that pywikibot problem? Maybe it's got too long a list of things to work on, and that fills up memory? It's hard to imagine logging so much that it fills up anything like the amount of memory that programs tend to be given these days. Dicklyon (talk) 06:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

@Dicklyon: I haven't had a chance to work on it, sorry (currently in the middle of moving to a new house). Bsoyka (t • c • g) 01:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a good move! Dicklyon (talk) 02:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bsoyka! A few years ago you helped me with my draft for Breaktime (organization). I'm currently writing more Wikipedia pages for nonprofits in Boston doing impactful work. Could you please take a look at my draft for Horizons? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Horizons_for_Homeless_Children

Thanks so much! Let me know if there's anything else I need to add WikiSpitfire (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

@WikiSpitfire: Hey! Yes, I remember that! Your draft looks pretty good at a first glance. I'm somewhat busy in the real world right now but would be happy to come back and take a deeper look later. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 02:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, whenever you have the time! I appreciate your help. WikiSpitfire (talk) 14:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think I can use this article? https://concordbridge.org/index.php/2024/03/23/concord-quietly-welcoming-migrants-to-local-emergency-shelter/

It has some good information about one of their programs. It's from a local news outlet called the Concord Bridge WikiSpitfire (talk) 18:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiSpitfire: I don't see why not! Seems like a reliable source to me—and this page on their website is especially reassuring. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 19:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I highlight in blue items (words) that refer back to articles that provide additional information about that topic of word that currently exists in wikipedia? --Guidegoose2 (talk) 01:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Guidegoose2: Hey there! You're talking about wikilinks—here's a quick tutorial on what they are and how to use them. Hope this helps! Bsoyka (t • c • g) 01:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering, how do you create a wikipedia page? Love wikipedia and really want to increase its grand collection of knowledge --WikipedianAncientHistorian (talk) 01:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikipedianAncientHistorian: Hey there! I'm actually going to point you toward my essay on why you shouldn't start an article just yet. Correctly creating articles on Wikipedia takes a decent amount of experience, and you should try to build up your skills before trying this. I know this isn't quite the answer you wanted to hear, but I hope it's one that helps you grow as a contributor to this great project. Happy editing, and reach out with whatever other questions you may have! Bsoyka (t • c • g) 02:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ella Powell went to Radyr Comprehensive School https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ella_Powell

https://georgiastatesports.com/sports/womens-soccer/roster/ella-powell/3937

Can you add her to the page? --BlunderingBaffoonary (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BlunderingBaffoonary: I actually encourage you to give it a shot! Anyone can edit Wikipedia, so would you like to go for it? Just hit the edit button on the page and start typing! Bsoyka (t • c • g) 13:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried and it won't let me 2A02:C7C:BF78:2D00:6572:45E9:8976:D8EB (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to try to help you resolve that—can you be more specific when you say "it won't let me"? As far as I can tell you should be able to edit that page. (Also, as a note, you seem to be logged out of your account now, which reveals your IP address as above instead of your username.) Bsoyka (t • c • g) 14:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my random wanderings around WP, I just noticed your discussion with a newbie at the Teahouse. I appreciate the balance between kindness, clarity, and firmness. Not like you solved global warming or anything, but I just thought you struck the exact right note, and wanted to say thanks. That's really kind of how it should be. A quick glance at the rest of this talk page makes me even happier you're here. Cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam: Thank you so much for reaching out! You have no idea how much your appreciation means to me—I'm really glad you think I came across that way. Looking forward to seeing you around here, even if it's less than usual! (PS: love the policy-violating blog.) Bsoyka (t • c • g) 21:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I probably should review your editing a little more, but I'm lazy and prone to jumping the gun. Would having the admin toolset be of any use to you? Your combination of article writing and problem-solving and cluefulness and 11k edits/7 years of experience are what I, at least, would want in an admin. If you're not interested, I won't pester, but if you think about it and want to explore the option some more, let me know. If nothing else, I could put you in touch with people far more experienced than me in nominating RFA candidates, and see what they think. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam: I really appreciate the idea, and I'd definitely like to pick up the mop eventually. Although, while I think I could handle the tools carefully, I'm doubtful about how my editing activity could be perceived by potential !voters. While I've been contributing for a while, it's been a bit inconsistent (see xtools). Also, I still have a few content issues I've been working to distance myself from, and not sure how those would seem in an RfA. I would definitely be interested in hearing more opinions though, perhaps through the people you mention or an ORCP. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 15:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ORCP is one option. I have no proof, but I have a gut feeling it might be better if you talked to one or two experienced people offline instead. I'm asking someone I trust if they'd be willing to look things over, and if they're too busy I have one or two others in mind. If it's OK, I'll point them in your direction. Might take a bit of time.

Whether the "skeletons" on that page you linked are a big deal or not probably depends mostly on when they happened. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's absolutely fine on my end, would love another opinion or two! I'm in no rush here of course, no stress on the timeline. Thanks again for the help and feedback! Bsoyka (t • c • g) 19:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bumping thread for 30 days. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 19:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean about inconsistent editing history. It wouldn't bother me, but I can see it bothering some. I think the people I have in mind would have a better opinion about that. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I look forward to hearing from them! You know where to have them find me, my talk page and email are always open. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 19:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the offer to talk - I will have a think about that. I am somewhat frustrated with various aspects and attitudes of Wiki but appreciate that isn't your fault! SnarkyDragon (talk) 21:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help—I'll be here if you need me. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 21:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it comes down to this ultimately - the person who reverted my article didn't display good faith - they just jumped on me and were really condescending.

(from wiki itself)

Demonstrate good faith[edit source]

Shortcut

WP:DGF

In addition to assuming good faith, encourage others to assume good faith by demonstrating your own good faith. You can do this by articulating your honest motives and by making edits that show your willingness to compromise, interest in improving Wikipedia, adherence to policies and guidelines, belief in the veracity of your edits, avoidance of gaming the system, and other good-faith behavior. Showing good faith is not required, but it aids smooth and successful interactions with editors.

Anyway I'll have a think about things and support appreciated :) SnarkyDragon (talk) 21:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

• One new partner
• 1Lib1Ref
• Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick review! And apologies for incorrectly nominating the article. I just completed the CZI-sponsored Wiki science editing class which was great (and encouraging), but the whole process still seems very technical. I find even the instructions regarding nominating the article difficult. I'll try again. Germlinep53 (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Germlinep53: I always hate to be the bearer of bad news around here, so I apologize if I discouraged you in any way. As I'm sure you've seen, Wikipedia can be really technical, specific, and hard-to-understand in some areas, and DYK is no different. To put it simply, though, DYK is mainly intended for sharing new articles. So, in that sense, unless you make some really significant changes to the Li–Fraumeni syndrome article (bringing it to meet the GA criteria or expanding its text 5x), it won't be eligible for DYK. I hope that makes a bit more sense, but please don't hesitate to reach out with more questions. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 20:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eh - "no fear" about being the bearer of bad news. Someone has to do it.  :-) But, yes, your latest (text) explanation above does better clarify eligibility. I appreciate your feedback and thank you for your time! Best regards! Germlinep53 (talk) 20:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]