User talk:AskWhy

Nineta Barbulescu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 17:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AskWhy,

This category is marked for deletion because it is empty. For some reason, you wrote content on it as if it was an article. But categories are used to organize pages and do not have content upon them. Empty categories are deleted and because you didn't use this as a category but as an article, it is tagged for deletion. If you have questions, please visit the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 06:34, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what seems to be wrong with my edit? I've read you said it was a "truth" bomb but you have not tried to improve my version of what I have said. Why not?

Please read the actual link cited by Alexbrn in his edit summary: WP:LEDEBOMB Acroterion (talk) 06:45, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have, thank you. Should then the whole content be dismissed if I will add the paragraph in the COV-19 section of the article? I don't understand why both POVs are not expressed in the article.:

Please read WP:MEDRS, the linked general sanctions notice above, WP:FRINGE, and the article talkpage before making major changes. Acroterion (talk) 06:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Acroterion for the help! I look forward to reading them soon. AskWhy (talk) 07:52, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]