User talk:94.204.244.111

Again, please stop trying to manually override headers with <big> tags. This has been explained a couple times already: there are no circumstances in which it is ever correct to remove normal header/subheader tags and replace them with <big> tags.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 03:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then how would you go with adding the heading “second flag (1885-present) because that’s what I’m trying to add for my edit. 94.204.244.111 (talk) 11:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I gave an explainer for this in my first message on your talk page, but I'll repost it here:

= Heading 1 =
== Heading 2 ==
=== Heading 3 ===
==== Heading 4 ====
===== Heading 5 =====
====== Heading 6 ======

To make a header, simply use === instead of manually making it big and bold. It looks like you deleted a header entirely and replaced it with two lines of manually bolded text, when what you were trying to do was just rename the header?  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 16:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and added the edit that I think you were trying to do. Basically, I added another === Level 3 heading named Second flag (1885-present) because the section for the first flag was also a level 3. I then took the other two headings, the one about the flag statute and the one about the modification, and changed them to level 4s by adding one more = on both sides. Now they display under the new "Second flag" section in the table of contents. I hope that's what you were trying to do, but if not, let me know and I'll try to help you out.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 16:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that’s what I was trying to achieve.

thank you 94.204.244.111 (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]