Talk:Sabalgarh

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Cities / Madhya Pradesh / Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities. This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

{{WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sabalgarh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141006140358/http://ourhero.in/population/cities/sabalgarh-802088 to http://ourhero.in/population/cities/sabalgarh-802088

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(@WikiDan61:)

Hi WikiDan61, I respect and very thankful to you that you've noticed and allowing me to explain it further.

Well, Yes, you may take it the handwritten notes, but if you ever belong to India or can ask any Indian history professor/researcher then you can understand that these are the documents which are being handwritten by our official family historian called "Jaga" (Jagas are a social caste-based group of people higher up in the Hindu hierarchy who held the traditional job of genealogists of primarily Rajput, Gurjar and Meenas[1] families mainly in Rajasthan, India and surrounding states. jagas are the caste which keep record of all generations of an individual family. there record was written in a big yellow book called (pothi). they comes in a category of brahmins.) please check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaga_(Rajasthan)

In India, every society & caste has its own "Jaga" to keep maintain the records of all generations from the last hundreds of year, Whenever a new marriage organized or a child born the "Jaga" visited the related cast/family to add the records of newly born child & newly married couple.

So, all the people in the town are known to the fact that Late. Mr. Sabal Singh Gurjar was my Great-Great Grandfather, and I especially captured those descendency written pages from Jaga pothi(genealogy book) to update the Wikipedia.

Please check a few posts from local researchers as they also used to visited Jaga and translated it to verify the facts. A beautiful video shoot done by my team for this historic contribution - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK11d4k9u5o

Check people also knew of our facts on social media: 1. Gwalior Gazetteer - https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.35648/page/n1 2. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=2184029721719697&id=100003380708444 3. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=2185968221525847&id=100003380708444 4. https://www.facebook.com/groups/671074102970491/permalink/2319687551442463/

I will get more details and verified content soon to help you and contribute my best efforts always!

You can reach me back anytime on below following---

Avtar Singh Gurjar, S/O Pratap Singh Gurjar Email: avtarsky9@gmail.com Phone: +91-7509112711 (WhatsApp also)

(@WikiDan61:)

Thank you very much of understanding the equivalent relationship of Indian Jaga[1] to your local baptistry records, Well, We have a few historians in our district who were researching on town Sabal Singh Gurjar and the Fort Of Sabalgarh, I will talk to them and would try to bring the published notes if its newer than 1908.

I am afraid, If I could not find something admissible as per the rules of Wikipedia then the important information of my clan & society would not be able to reach to my upcoming generation, caste, community.

Whereas, in the upcoming future and in the age of quantum computing, only digital records like Wikipedia will be the only valid resource for this valuable knowledge of clans, caste, community, descendants, etc. and any type of paper records may not be working or valid as valued resource of knowledge in the future.

So, kindly help me that how can I keep posting these important pieces of information about our history if not having proper admissible content as per this platform, can we go with any undertaking sign up? or non-disclosure-agreement, of confidentiality contract or anything else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AvtarSinghGurjar (talk • contribs)

@AvtarSinghGurjar: As mentioned in the discussion at my user talk page, the handwritten notes in your possession are not a reliable source for the information you are trying to add. I would further add that the claim that people who live in the town now are the descendants of the person who founded the town is not exactly encyclopedic. It is the kind of local interest information that is not applicable to a global encyclopedia. I understand your desire to document your own town's history and lore, and there are other places to do so. You can set up your own website or try one of Wikipedia's suggested alternative outlets. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]