Talk:Christian cross variants

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Heraldry and vexillology Christian cross variants is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

Text and/or other creative content from Christian cross was copied or moved into Christian cross variants. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Should wayside crosses be added to the artifacts section?--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I think that it's a good idea. I say yes. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have its own article and images are a little hard to find but from what I understand the Corpus Christi is typically recognized as an independent representation of the crucified body, should it be added to the "artifacts" section or should it just be treated as an element of the crucifix? Orchastrattor (talk) 02:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see the relation between crosses that are exclusive to a specific region and symbols that belong outside the "basic 15 variants". Given how large this section is, I think it would be better to split it up into "Denominational or Regional variants" and "Traditional motifs" Aye-Caramba (talk) 18:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]