Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 33

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 01:42, Sunday, April 28, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Removal of former parameter to clear out Category:Pages using infobox SCOTUS case with unknown parameters

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Template talk:Infobox SCOTUS case#Warning: Page using Template:Infobox SCOTUS case with unknown parameter "SCOTUS" (this message is shown only in preview)., Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 19 (a similar task)

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: < 3,020

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: In October 2018, the |SCOTUS= parameter was removed from Template:Infobox SCOTUS case. This task would remove any current uses of it, which do not result in any output other than the error category.

Discussion[edit]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. @DannyS712:. As per usual, please report back here when done and take all the time you need to trial this task. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Trial complete. 52 edits made - [1]. I did the first few manually to perfect the regex, and previewed the rest of the bot edits - didn't see any errors. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: {{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} its been a week since I finished the trial --DannyS712 (talk) 19:35, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the ping and sorry for the delay. Please see the below, DannyS712. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. Under normal circumstances, I would prefer to leave the close for someone else. However, given the backlog, lack of recent BAG activity (myself included), and the fact that this task is uncontroversial and based on how well the trial went, I am inclined to make an exception for this. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.