www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dangle Glynn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Dangle Glynn[edit]

Steve Dangle Glynn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a sports commentator, based entirely on primary sources with the exception of a single video interview in which he's the interviewee rather than the subject. A person does not get a Wikipedia article on the basis of their own self-published social media presence — they get a Wikipedia article via coverage in which they're the subject of reliable source content written by other people, but no coverage of that type has been shown here. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Subject of article does not meet the wikipedia notability threshold WP:N and certainly does not pass WP:GNG since there are no proper references with significant coverage across multiple WP:RS. Zpeopleheart (talk) 09:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not currently notable and improvable. SwisterTwister talk 08:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.