Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Fassler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. As this is a 16-year-old article of a BLP that is unsourced, this is not a soft-deletion. Daniel (talk) 22:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Fassler[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unref blp, has been here for 17 years. I could find sources, but not sufficient reliable ones. Boleyn (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Character actor that never rose to prominence, this is about the best I can find, but it's a Forbes contributor piece. [1]. Simply being an actor doesn't get you a wikipage. This appears to be just a longtime actor. Oaktree b (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.