Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Nguyen Van Hung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I hope these sources can find their way into the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Nguyen Van Hung

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible cross-wiki spam, noticed some 15 years ago already. I don't see notability; he is an activist but without major achievements. Nadzik (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Taiwan and Vietnam. Nadzik (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity, Japan, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Google translate isn't giving me any help on the Chinese sources but the State Department and Taipei Times both look like significant coverage in reliable sources.— Moriwen (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete - see also Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Nipponese_Dog_Calvero. Hoyanova (talk) 06:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FYI ar:special:diff/66394263; requests to create the article on the Arabic Wikipedia. (Please see GUC) --Alaa :)..! 15:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – There is good sourcing, including the ones Moriwen raised, so this is fine. Notability should be determined apart from LTA case / UPE or whatever. TLA^tlak 02:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Mentioned in a few articles [1], [2], with probably the best here [3], as human rights activist. I think we have just enough basic coverage about the person. A mention here [4] Oaktree b (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion such as the Taipei Times, The Diplomat and others so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.