Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell 宇田

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (A7) by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bell 宇田[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references were shown in this article. It is also very short and needs to be translated from Chinese to English. (Also does not show why this person is important) (Posted using TW-TW) The Pancake of Heaven! 06:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 07:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A lack of references in an article is a maintenance issue, not grounds for deletion. The article is not so short that it doesn't qualify as a legitimate stub. Articles posted here in languages other than English are handled following the procedures at WP:Pages needing translation into English, and aren't eligible for deletion on that basis until it's gone two weeks without being translated (at which time they are typically PRODded). 10:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, I missed the last point. If the article uncontestably doesn't show why the person is important and the person isn't notable, then the article qualifies for speedy deletion under WP:A7 and there was no need to initiate a discussion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.