Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatriz Romilly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 15:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beatriz Romilly[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe she fails WP:NACTOR. Unfortunately I found only one brief interview from a theatre website. She does seem to be working frequently (and in notable productions) so I think it seems a case of WP:TOOSOON. —Мандичка^YO 😜 22:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not finding significant coverage to demonstrate notability; doesn't look like she meets WP:NACTOR. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient sourcing; of the seven cites used to "source" this article, six are clearly not even within the realm of meeting WP:RS standards. The seventh is an RS, but it contains no in-depth or meaningful discussion of the subject, beyond noting that she played a certain role in a production. Clearly this is insufficient available sourcing to satisfy either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR, and my own attempts to turn up anything further have not uncovered anything to shift the analysis. All factors considered, a fairly easy call. Snow ^{let's rap} 22:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.