Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Action for Justice - AFJ/AXJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak. Synergy 01:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Action for Justice - AFJ/AXJ

Looks like wp:coi talk page of non existing article space page. -- Jeandré, 2009-03-15t10:37z 10:37, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy Close call but it does not have spam links etc. which are more clearly a problem. Short. No harm. Place in userspace where it belongs. Collect (talk) 11:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy per Collect, if only because it's pretty new, and could perhaps become an article. If it doesn't, I would not object to deletion at a later date. Robofish (talk) 18:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Requested G8 speedy - as talkpage of nonexistent article. //roux   21:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• The article was rejected over three years ago at Articles for creation. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-02-13#Action for Justice - AFJ.2FAXJ. This is even less aceptable than that was. At least the failed AFC submission was encyclopaedic in tone and content, didn't exhort the reader in the first person, and didn't make nonsense statements about copyrights. What reason is there to keep this around, userfied or otherwise, when (a) the existing AFC submission, poor as it is, is better, and could even become an article if the sourcing reasons for rejection were actually addressed, and (b) the editor who made this talk page and whom it is being proposed it be userfied for, AXJ-USA (talk · contribs), clearly knows where the 3-year-old AFC submission is, since editing it was xyr very first edit? Uncle G (talk) 02:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.