User contributions for Pngeditor
Appearance
A user with 864 edits. Account created on 22 April 2020.
12 January 2023
- 16:4516:45, 12 January 2023 diff hist +109 User talk:Pngeditor →Blocked as a sockpuppet: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5115:51, 12 January 2023 diff hist +1,317 User talk:Pngeditor →{{unblock | reason=Reply to my denial of request to be unblocked}}: new section Tag: New topic
- 10:1210:12, 12 January 2023 diff hist +827 User talk:Pngeditor →{{unblock|I am not a sock puppet ~~~~}}: new section Tag: New topic
10 January 2023
- 12:1612:16, 10 January 2023 diff hist +151 User talk:Pngeditor →Sources: Reply Tag: Reply
9 January 2023
- 14:3314:33, 9 January 2023 diff hist −283 Kenneth Roth →Remarks on Israeli's policies and actions: Removed POV claim, possibly OR. Since this comparison did not occur, it is irrelevant what the Professor thinks. No evidence that the Professor was specifically referring to this advertisement anyway.
- 14:3114:31, 9 January 2023 diff hist −5 Kenneth Roth →Remarks on Israeli's policies and actions: Removed superfluous word
- 14:3014:30, 9 January 2023 diff hist +2 Kenneth Roth →Remarks on Israeli's policies and actions: Removed [OR] Nowhere in the advertisement is this comparison between the Holocaust and Israel's actions in Gaza actually made.
- 14:2714:27, 9 January 2023 diff hist +31 Kenneth Roth →Remarks on Israeli's policies and actions: This is more correct
- 14:1814:18, 9 January 2023 diff hist +16 Kenneth Roth →Remarks on Israeli's policies and actions: Removed POV wording.
- 14:1614:16, 9 January 2023 diff hist +1 m Kenneth Roth →Remarks on Israeli's policies and actions: Typo fix
- 14:1314:13, 9 January 2023 diff hist +13 Kenneth Roth →Israel and the Jewish people: This is better, there is nothing here about 'the Jewish people'. Only criticism and defence of his remarks on Israeli policies.
- 14:0914:09, 9 January 2023 diff hist −1,006 Kenneth Roth →Israel and the Jewish people: It wasn't Roth who criticised Israel it was HRW. The other claim is not noteworthy enough to include here.
- 14:0614:06, 9 January 2023 diff hist −438 Kenneth Roth →Israel and the Jewish people: We don't need this, it adds nothing. If there is a specific part of the document to reference, then it should be extracted and include, but not what is really just a link to a document of allegations.
- 14:0514:05, 9 January 2023 diff hist −29 Kenneth Roth →Israel and the Jewish people: Remove POV wording, this is much better.
- 13:5813:58, 9 January 2023 diff hist +76 Kenneth Roth →Israel and the Jewish people: From the same RS.
- 13:2613:26, 9 January 2023 diff hist −57 Kenneth Roth →Israel and the Jewish people: This is what the source actually says, on page 11.
- 11:4611:46, 9 January 2023 diff hist +47 Romani Holocaust A bit of a tidy up of the wording, also I found a different date in the RS. Regards
6 January 2023
- 19:5219:52, 6 January 2023 diff hist +3 Israeli–Palestinian conflict Added missing word. Tag: Reverted
- 19:5119:51, 6 January 2023 diff hist +318 Israeli–Palestinian conflict The reason given for the revert is not sufficent. This can be reverted if it is either not from a reliable source, or not relevant to this article. Neither apply here. The answer to the charge of one side having more respresentation than another is to add more material from polls of Palestinian views of Israelis. Tag: Reverted
- 19:3919:39, 6 January 2023 diff hist +293 Talk:1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight →Requested move 6 January 2023: Support
- 18:2718:27, 6 January 2023 diff hist +811 Talk:Roald Dahl No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:4214:42, 6 January 2023 diff hist +846 Talk:Roald Dahl →Anti-semitic and anti-Israeli?: Reply
- 14:2814:28, 6 January 2023 diff hist +648 Talk:Kingdom of Israel (Samaria) →Requested move 2 January 2023: Reply
5 January 2023
- 23:4923:49, 5 January 2023 diff hist −268 Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Background: This article is on the Israeli Palestinian conflict. This paragraph is only relevant to the wider Israeli Arab conflict article. Only events internal to Israel/Palestine such as the Nakba and Naksa should be included in this article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:3623:36, 5 January 2023 diff hist −141 Israeli–Palestinian conflict We dont need this with the addition of the poll results, which are more specific. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:3223:32, 5 January 2023 diff hist +132 Israeli–Palestinian conflict Some more from this survey. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 18:5418:54, 5 January 2023 diff hist +1,161 Talk:Roald Dahl →Anti-semitic and anti-Israeli?: Reply.
- 12:2212:22, 5 January 2023 diff hist +87 King–Crane Commission Undid revision 1075951220 by 74.255.226.195 (talk) editor does not appear to meet ARPBIA requirements. Tag: Undo
- 12:2112:21, 5 January 2023 diff hist −1,138 King–Crane Commission Undid revision 1131591812 by Scrtagent101 (talk) user does not appear to meet ARPBIA requirements. Tag: Undo
- 09:4209:42, 5 January 2023 diff hist +30 Solomon's Temple Undid revision 1131586982 by Tombah (talk) Not an improvement, the previous wording was NPOV. It is best to state this in view of the many later references to a lack of evidence. Tag: Undo
4 January 2023
- 20:1920:19, 4 January 2023 diff hist +13 User:Pngeditor/sandbox No edit summary current
- 20:1720:17, 4 January 2023 diff hist −17 Roald Dahl Undid revision 1131571876 by ND81 (talk) Your opinion on this matter is not sufficient. You need reliable sources to back up this change. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 20:1420:14, 4 January 2023 diff hist +33 m Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Boycotts
- 20:1220:12, 4 January 2023 diff hist +55 Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Israeli military occupation of the West Bank: Updated from the latest Hamas Charter
- 20:0620:06, 4 January 2023 diff hist +1 m Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Israeli security concerns: Typo fix
- 20:0420:04, 4 January 2023 diff hist +20 m Israeli–Palestinian conflict Better wording, fixed typo.
- 20:0220:02, 4 January 2023 diff hist −277 Israeli–Palestinian conflict More up to date polling results.
- 19:5819:58, 4 January 2023 diff hist +645 Israeli–Palestinian conflict Added some other polling results to this section
- 19:4319:43, 4 January 2023 diff hist 0 m Israeli–Palestinian conflict Fixed typo
- 19:4019:40, 4 January 2023 diff hist −8 m Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Background: Removed supefluous word.
- 19:4019:40, 4 January 2023 diff hist +2 Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Background: Better wording
- 19:3919:39, 4 January 2023 diff hist +12 m Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Background: Links added
- 19:3819:38, 4 January 2023 diff hist +105 Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Background: Added in that the British forces had support.
- 19:1419:14, 4 January 2023 diff hist +78 Israeli–Palestinian conflict More accurate representation of the poll results. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:4317:43, 4 January 2023 diff hist +18 Israeli–Palestinian conflict →Issues in dispute: This statement needs a source. It makes a claim relating to Hamas members, not the Hamas leadership, or Hamas policy. The latest Hamas charter recognises a Palestinian state on '67 borders.
3 January 2023
- 16:0416:04, 3 January 2023 diff hist +591 Netzah Yehuda Battalion →Combat: Re introduced following removal for copyright infringement. Hopefully this is ok. Removed out of date entry.
- 10:3910:39, 3 January 2023 diff hist −17 Roald Dahl Undid revision 1131268365 by ND81 (talk) Not an improvement. Especially as this does not even say alleged anti Semitic remarks. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 09:2209:22, 3 January 2023 diff hist −10 Samaria I did not realise this page was subject to ARPBIA, whivh means Sevensliders should not have reverted my original change. Removing for the moment. ~~~~ Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
2 January 2023
- 20:5920:59, 2 January 2023 diff hist +721 Talk:History of ancient Israel and Judah No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 20:4120:41, 2 January 2023 diff hist +10 Samaria The title of this article is Samaria. The correct title of the linked page should be used. There is no justification for using a partial title. The edit reason given is not correct. There is no confusion when the correct title is used. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit