User contributions for Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

15:1915:19, 9 June 2024 diff hist +286‎ Talk:Paleontology ‎ →‎Does Paleontology just count as the study of pre-historic life instead of pre-history in general?: Reply current Tag: Reply
13:5913:59, 9 June 2024 diff hist +12,666‎ Islamic views on evolution ‎ Undid revision 1228052758 by Anachronist (talk) Anything theology related is going to have primary sources. Additionally, the theology section includes opinions of various well known Islamic scholars and Quranic verses related to the topic in discussion. These are important for inclusion and if you think the section has unwanted materials, remove them individually instead of removing the entire section. Tags: Undo Reverted

20:3520:35, 8 June 2024 diff hist +12,666‎ Islamic views on evolution ‎ The information which was removed were perfectly reasonable for inclusion in the article and are important, and the reasonings given for their removal are faulty or invalid. The article very clearly states that these are "arguments" so it is not promoting anything, thus it does not break neutrality. Things such as big bang are important in the creation-evolution discourse and the theology section also included the creation story of Adam which is important in this discourse. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

12:0912:09, 17 May 2024 diff hist +326‎ Acceptance of evolution by religious groups ‎ Evolution is not so controversial and not as widely rejected in the Muslim community. Main controversy lies at human evolution. Surveys among Muslims which differentiate between human and non-human evolution see a large support for the overall evolution theory. Tag: Visual edit
10:5610:56, 17 May 2024 diff hist +45‎ Evolution ‎ Okay, but I think for the lack of bias, Acceptance of evolution by religious groups should also be included alongside rejection. Tag: Visual edit
06:3806:38, 17 May 2024 diff hist +82‎ Evolution ‎ Added further information in social and cultural responses section. Tags: Reverted Visual edit

17:2717:27, 16 May 2024 diff hist +3‎ Evolution ‎ Replaced "refuted" with "superseded" as this is a much more accurate term. Tags: Reverted Visual edit

16:2616:26, 15 May 2024 diff hist +1,082‎ User talk:Nooksz ‎ →‎Disruptive behavior: new section current Tag: New topic
13:0813:08, 15 May 2024 diff hist +873‎ Talk:Francis Collins ‎ →‎Dr Francis Collins a pseudoscientist?: Reply Tag: Reply
12:5312:53, 15 May 2024 diff hist −117‎ Talk:Francis Collins ‎ What the hell was this title even? And who even put it here? I didn't read the entire comment section, but the claim of ruining legacy just doesn't make sense. And It's not allowed to label other's comments like this and the label itself was both promotional (to Hitchens) and attacking another person in an informal manner which against Wikipedia's rules. Wikipedia is neutral and can't take sides.