www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User contributions for Nasua Narica

A user with 324 edits. Account created on 6 July 2015.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

29 May 2024

29 April 2024

30 October 2023

25 September 2023

1 September 2023

28 August 2023

24 August 2023

9 August 2023

  • 15:1915:19, 9 August 2023 diff hist +50 Cotoname languageUndid revision 1169416897 by Zwithzs (talk) Respectfully, I think you misunderstand the term. Language isolates are languages that *cannot* be classified into larger language families. They are not necessarily entirely independent lineages but rather any relationship to other known languages is so remote that linguistic methods are incapable of detecting the resemblance. Tag: Undo
  • 15:1215:12, 9 August 2023 diff hist +53 Chitimacha languageUndid revision 1169415566 by Zwithzs (talk) "Language isolate" is the better label since Chitimacha is well-attested enough that many attempts have been made to find a genetic relationship with other known languages, and none of these have found results that have been widely accepted. Please discuss the isolate vs. unclassified issue in Talk before repeating your edits. Tag: Undo

6 July 2023

27 June 2023

24 May 2023

9 May 2023

  • 01:5701:57, 9 May 2023 diff hist +49 Cuitlatec languageCuitlatec’s affiliation with the Chibchan languages has not been established. Greenberg and Ruhlen only present some surface similarities and do not demonstrate regular sound correspondences. If you know of a more serious demonstration, add it to this article or bring it up on Talk. Undid revision 1153869694 by Aloevariation (talk) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

8 May 2023

28 April 2023

24 April 2023

20 April 2023

12 April 2023

10 April 2023

  • 14:5814:58, 10 April 2023 diff hist −543 Arhuaco languageRemoved the Ostler quote again. Please discuss this on the Talk page before adding it again. This reference is insufficient for a claim that Arhuaco violates a linguistic universal especially since most other sources identify independent personal pronouns. If "what superficially looks like personal pronouns may not be" then we should find that argument in print and cite it, not a short quote that (I agree) is probably missing context and deeper explanation Tag: Visual edit

7 April 2023

3 April 2023

8 December 2022

2 December 2022

8 November 2022

26 September 2022

19 September 2022

16 September 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)