www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

User talk:The1337gamer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bryanw1995 (talk | contribs) at 20:21, 7 March 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

== Why do you keep deleting my changes to the Grim Dawn Wikipedia entry? ==Bryanw1995 (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Bryanw1995[reply]

Remaining 2015 dates for all regions for Wii U games.

Hey, if it's not too much trouble, do you mind making some last 2015 adjustments to the List of Wii U software? I tried looking for the North American release for Action Henk, Lovely Planet, and The Deer God on the Nintendo eShop on my Wii U (yes, I had to do this because Nintendo's official website doesn't update or hasn't added the release date for games that were supposed to be released in 2015), but when I went to search for the game, those three games weren't there. So could you help me with adding game release dates to the page from now on if you can, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zacharyalejandro: Sorry I didn't get back on this. I've been a little busy. I did a quick search the other day but couldn't find reliable sources stating the exact release dates. I'll search again more thoroughly when I have more time. --The1337gamer (talk) 20:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2015, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WWE 2K16

You should know to discuss this on talk rather than edit warring. Please don't go up to the 3RR line. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: There is nothing to discuss, the accompanying citations say mixed reviews, it's not open to interpretation. The IP editor is being intentionally disruptive and has already been reverted by 2 other editors. If admins decided wake up and pay attention to WP:AIV, then I wouldn't have to waste my time reverting them. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Arguing it on talk would be better than an edit war. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Quote WP:BRD and discuss it in talk.
Regarding your warning to the anon: this is a content dispute, not vandalism. The IP is not "damaging" Wikipedia. S/he may have different understanding of the material or sources. Please don't template someone for vandalism under those conditions. See wp:vandalism
Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Next time just ping me. But be careful—revert three times in an edit war (right or wrong) and you'll end up blocked next time. Likewise, the IP will be blocked again if they continue. czar 19:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I was wondering if you want to take a look on the GameCube's talk page. I posted a help request and was wondering if you have the time to help me on it. Thanks Zacharyalejandro (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zacharyalejandro: I commented at Talk:GameCube. Personally, I don't think it is anything to worry about. Redirects are fine and there are over 1000 links to change. --The1337gamer (talk) 20:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

I had Reed the reference s for benningers page and you deserve a gift Kirby555 (talk) 21:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join StrategyWiki

Hello The1337gamer. I've noticed how active you are working on video game articles. I was hoping you'd consider accepting an invitation to join StrategyWiki. We're a friendly wiki community focused strictly on video games, and we could really use someone with your acumen and attention to detail to help around the site. We'd be very grateful for your contributions. Hope to see you there. Plotor (talk) 01:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plotor (talk • contribs) [reply]

Specific please?

Next time you remove content from an article, can you please be a little more specific than just "How is this noteworthy?". I couldn't help but noticed you removed an edit of mine. The edit I made was made with good faith and no vandalism. Zucat (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy 7 Remake

I changed the release date information numerous times with a reliable citation and all you have to say for deleting it is that my citation is not reliable. If the information from the GAME DEVELOPERS OFFICIAL WEBSITE is not reliable information then I'm not sure what is. Please get off your high horse and let people make valid edits.RedG09 (talk) 22:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RedG09: The source you've added says nothing about the release date of FFVII remake. Stop wasting your time and making shit up. --The1337gamer (talk) 22:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@The1337gamer: Are you kidding? The source says "Release Date: This winter (PS4)". How is that not valid and how are you not seeing that? Honestly how about you actually look at the citation before condemning people like this. I'm not trying to start anything I'm just trying to make a helpful edit that is 100% verifiable. Please at least look into it and give me a valid reason for deleting my edit. I'm not vandalising I'm trying to help. RedG09 (talk) 22:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@RedG09: You are misinterpreting the source you provided: [1]. The page you linked is for the original Final Fantasy VII, not the remake. The original FFVII was ported and released on PS4 in December 2015, (this Winter just passed). Square Enix just haven't updated the page to reflect that. --The1337gamer (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@The1337gamer: Okay that makes sense. Disregard my arguments and I thank you sincerely for giving me clarity on this matter. Sorry I edited it again before this comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedG09 (talk • contribs)

Thanks...

...for your continued 'monitoring' of NBA 2K16. It's nice when I'm not the only experienced user watching a page for vandalism. —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not adding inapproprite links

Hello Please do not again and again remove my added links as they are very much appropriate to the content. I ask you to first have a look at link and than delete it. Dmbusena (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dmbusena: No, it's spam. Get lost. --The1337gamer (talk) 15:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello re deletion

Indie Game Reviewer is a non notable review site? Here is a list of wiki entries that cite Indie Game Reviewer

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=indie+game+reviewer

The site is 9 years old and has been cited by Gamasutra, Popurls and many others over its history of reportage.

It is cited as THE source for the annual winners of the IndieCade awards. They host a database of over 700 original articles and video interviews with many of the largest and most important independent game developers in the past 15 years. Gematria (talk) 07:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=indiegamereviewer.com Gematria (talk) 07:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gematria: It failed to meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. See WP:GNG. There needs to significant coverage about the subject itself from reliable independent sources and there wasn't any. Those things you mentioned don't contribute to the subject's notability. --The1337gamer (talk) 08:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Thel337gamer: Thank you for that information. I still feel that, in spite of some outdated reference links, this site is very notable in the independent gaming community. It is rare that news sites will write about news sites, so difficult to find notability in that way, however there are many legitimate companies that reference the site in question and moreover as I pointed out above - the entry itself is used by dozens of other wikipedia pages as a legitimate reference for their own award and accolades and otherwise. So how then, does this exclude the site itself from being relevant?
If you could kindly reconsider this important page, to the ecosystem, I will make attempts to find more recent and active links that are not from the site itself.
Some quick examples from a current google search:
Again, I reassert - that Indie Game Reviewer is widespread, and though they do not cover AAA titles but rather a far more diverse and underground sector of the games market, an integral and naturally integrated part of the ecosystem.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gematria (talk • contribs)
@Gematria: Other Wikipedia pages and websites using Indie Game Reviewer as a reference does not imply notability or contribute to notability in any way. There is a distinction between what can be used as a reference and what is notable enough to have an article, and neither implies the other. As I mentioned above, the criteria for notability is significant coverage from reliable independent sources on the subject itself. These sources you've provided don't seem to cover Indie Game Reviewer with any real depth or to a significant degree. They are just name drops, so that doesn't help. Also see WP:RS for identifying reliable sources because blogs and self-published sources cannot be used. --The1337gamer (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Thel33tgamer: Again, thank you for your help. I hope you can help me to find the solution. It is a shame to see this not be included in the Wikipedia. Here is another article for example, from the Mail & Guardian - a legitimate newspaper in Africa (in web form) = http://mg.co.za/article/2011-09-30-desktop-trap-is-a-cracker (Alexa ranking 13k)
"Back home locally created indie game Desktop Dungeons is fresh out of the starting blocks but is already winning rave reviews offshore. American science and technology site Wired calls it a “little gem of a game [that] promises fast rewards, even faster battles, and treasure galore — all in 10 to 20 minutes”.
Developer site Gamasutra selected it as one of the top 10 independent games for 2010, and IndieGame­Reviewer.com says Desktop Dungeons is “a free micro rogue-like puzzle game more addictive than crack”."
Again, all of these sources, respect that IGR is a credible source and place to reference. There is no New York Times article in and of itself that has written extensively about the site, however, we must use occam's razor to deduce that it is credible, based on its proliferation and the credibility of these diverse sources albeit apparently cursory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gematria (talk • contribs)
@Gematria: The subject of that newspaper article is Desktop Dungeons, not Indie Game Reviewer. It says nothing about IndieGameReviewer, it just pulls a quote from them and nothing more. So I'll reiterate once more that for a topic to meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability there needs to significant coverage from independent and reliable sources on the subject. --The1337gamer (talk) 09:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Thel33tgamer: well the coverage is independent and reliable, it simply isn't significant enough - in these samples, though I would argue that the Dorkshelf podcast is, for example. I request that you give the article a chance to be improved, having offered this stern set of conditions. It is understood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gematria (talk • contribs)
@Gematria: Well I can't give the article a chance to be improved because it was already deleted. I didn't delete it either. I simply nominated it for deletion, which initiated a discussion about whether to keep or delete the article. The consensus was to delete it. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Thel33tgamer: That's a shame. Hope you guys feel like you served the public. Sure took a step back on tracking an important and historic node. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:e000:60d9:3c00:311b:ecac:ae89:9e (talk • contribs)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The1337gamer&oldid=708824350"