User talk:Stayfi

• We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Don't edit war the same article as an an anonymous and logged in user. Санта Клаус (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• i didn't understood ur english Санта Клаус! nd i think i know zhy i didn't understood it!! (understand!!) --Stayfi (talk) 21:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Arabic Wikipedia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu 01:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This isn't n original research, you can always take look to the articles about mohamed and the vagina, i'll add the in references. it will better also, if u coud understand arabic. i'll try to get a hand ffrom 3 israelis who could. regards --Stayfi (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel inclined to unprotect Arabic Wikipedia at present due the the flood of apparent sockuppets adding this information, and, who, incidentally, I am about to block. Put your references on the article's Talk page please, and let them be judged for reliability. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 14:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Ah ok, rodhull, no problem. --Stayfi (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

لا أعتقد أن أحدا سيرضخ لطلبي، أنا أنصحك أن تأخذ فترة إجازة وتريح نفسك ثم حاول أن تصلح الأمور وتكسب ثقة المجتمع من جديد --Osm agha (talk) 16:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Although we encourage everyone to seek dispute resolution when necessary, a recent report you made to WP:AN appeared to be redundant. Every time you make a report to a noticeboard, it takes time away from other editors and administrators in order to examine the report. Repeated reports are disruptive and may be considered a form of forum shopping. Thank you. --Jaysweet (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• So...what? Jaysweet, u can always ignore it, no? nd let others see/do, what u don't hav time to see/do (it's relative dear) (there isn't just one admin, nd this is why we're calling many opinions) --Stayfi (talk) 20:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: (there isn't just one admin, nd this is why we're calling many opinions)

Dude, read the links I send you. Please see WP:FORUMSHOP for why this is an inappropriate thing to do. --Jaysweet (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Double Dude, u could hav asked me wheter i read it or not! yes i read it, nd i found ur position normal, nd mine also...--Stayfi (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can file a report similar to this, request CU or reply to the accusation. Санта Клаус (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]