Temporary Disabled. :) please Go back Author:("Aligianni, Suzana Ioanna") - IOS Press www.fgks.org » Address: [go: up one dir, main page] Include Form Remove Scripts Accept Cookies Show Images Show Referer Rotate13 Base64 Strip Meta Strip Title Session Cookies You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly. Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer In header section. Select this link to jump to navigation Help About us Contact us In navigation section. Select this link to jump to content Menu Home Journals Cart € title="Change currency to USD - US Dollar"$ Log in / Register Search Search Published between: Published from year: and Published to year: Search syntax help Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you. Boolean operators This OR thatThis AND thatThis NOT that Must include "This" and "That" This That Must not include "That" This -That "This" is optional This +That Exact phrase "This That" "This That" Grouping (this AND that) OR (that AND other) In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation Your search for: 'author:("Aligianni, Suzana Ioanna")' has returned 1 result. (0.02s) Save search Mark all Add marked to cart Export marked citations Select this result for bulk action Validation of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instruments COGTEL and COGTEL+ in Identifying Clinically Diagnosed Neurocognitive Disorder Due to Alzheimer’s Disease in a Naturalistic Clinical Setting… Authors: Alexopoulos, Panagiotis | Skondra, Maria | Kontogianni, Evagellia | Vratsista, Aikaterini | Frounta, Maria | Konstantopoulou, Georgia | Aligianni, Suzana Ioanna | Charalampopoulou, Marina | Lentzari, Iliana | Gourzis, Philippos | Kliegel, Matthias | Economou, Polychronis | Politis, Antonios Article Type: Research Article Abstract: Background: Telephone-based neurocognitive instruments embody valuable tools in identifying cognitive impairment in research settings and lately also in clinical contexts due to the pandemic crisis. The accuracy of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) in detecting mild- (MiND) and major (MaND) neurocognitive disorder has not been studied yet. Objective: Comparison of the utility of COGTEL and COGTEL+, which is enriched with orientation items, with the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) in detecting MiND and MaND due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and assessment of the impact of COGTEL face-to-face-versus telephone administration on individual performance. Methods: The study included 197 cognitively intact …individuals (CI), being at least 45 years old, 95 and 65 patients with MiND and MaND due to AD, respectively. In 20 individuals COGTEL was administered both in face-to-face and telephone sessions. Statistical analyses included proportional odds logistic regression models, stratified repeated random subsampling used to recursive partitioning to training and validation set (70/30 ratio), and an appropriate F-test. Results: All studied instruments were significant predictors of diagnostic outcome, but COGTEL+ and 3MS explained more variance relative to the original COGTEL. Except for the validation regression models including COGTEL in which the average misclassification error slightly exceeded 15%, in all other cases the average misclassification errors (%) were lower than 15%. COGTEL administration modality was not related to systematic over- or underestimation of performance on COGTEL. Conclusion: COGTEL+ is a valuable instrument in detecting MiND and MaND and can be administered in face-to-face or telephone sessions. Show more Keywords: Mild and major neurocognitive disorder, modified Mini-Mental State Examination, telephone-based neurocognitive testing DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210477 Citation: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 259-268, 2021 Get PDF No filters available.
Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Authors: Alexopoulos, Panagiotis | Skondra, Maria | Kontogianni, Evagellia | Vratsista, Aikaterini | Frounta, Maria | Konstantopoulou, Georgia | Aligianni, Suzana Ioanna | Charalampopoulou, Marina | Lentzari, Iliana | Gourzis, Philippos | Kliegel, Matthias | Economou, Polychronis | Politis, Antonios
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Background: Telephone-based neurocognitive instruments embody valuable tools in identifying cognitive impairment in research settings and lately also in clinical contexts due to the pandemic crisis. The accuracy of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) in detecting mild- (MiND) and major (MaND) neurocognitive disorder has not been studied yet. Objective: Comparison of the utility of COGTEL and COGTEL+, which is enriched with orientation items, with the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) in detecting MiND and MaND due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and assessment of the impact of COGTEL face-to-face-versus telephone administration on individual performance. Methods: The study included 197 cognitively intact …individuals (CI), being at least 45 years old, 95 and 65 patients with MiND and MaND due to AD, respectively. In 20 individuals COGTEL was administered both in face-to-face and telephone sessions. Statistical analyses included proportional odds logistic regression models, stratified repeated random subsampling used to recursive partitioning to training and validation set (70/30 ratio), and an appropriate F-test. Results: All studied instruments were significant predictors of diagnostic outcome, but COGTEL+ and 3MS explained more variance relative to the original COGTEL. Except for the validation regression models including COGTEL in which the average misclassification error slightly exceeded 15%, in all other cases the average misclassification errors (%) were lower than 15%. COGTEL administration modality was not related to systematic over- or underestimation of performance on COGTEL. Conclusion: COGTEL+ is a valuable instrument in detecting MiND and MaND and can be administered in face-to-face or telephone sessions. Show more
Keywords: Mild and major neurocognitive disorder, modified Mini-Mental State Examination, telephone-based neurocognitive testing
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210477
Citation: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 259-268, 2021