User talk:Framawiki: Difference between revisions

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Framawiki!

Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if you could add a note (or user box) that you are an OTRS agent on your user page. While I found it on French Wikipedia, it is a bit complicated to confirm it that way. :) --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 19:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New contributor here. Attempting to add an author and her books including book cover images to Wiki. Just having a hard time finding the proper procedures/etiquette. The images are owned by author, so what am I doing wrong?

--Troutmanjeff (talk) 18:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:My drawing (15445013475).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

lNeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify why you believe the picture that File:Lukyanenko O. V. In the Grip of De-Stalinization.jpg is a derivative work of has sufficient permission based on the OTRS ticket? I see no evidence that the permission is valid for the picture itself. Feel free to respond in a ticket note if you want to discuss specifics that can't be talked about on-wiki, but please ping me here when you respond. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rob₁₃, please see ticket. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Responded. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just pinging noting that my response in the ticket is still waiting for your input. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rob₁₃, thanks for pinging. I post a proposal on the ticket, can you review ? Thanks --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see & comment on my section on the Village pump about this file. Elisfkc (talk) 03:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for investigation. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand claims that file. This is my own work. Copyright belongs to me. Please explain more what's the problem? P.S. If you found somewhere in the same file, it also belongs to me.--Garrik1966 (talk) 08:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Garrik1966, no problem. We just want to have a prove / declaration that you are been the author. Please see my second message in your talk page and send an email with filled template. Don't hesitate to contact me if needed. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand yours claims. I repeat, no matter where you found the image, it is mine. Give a link where you found it. If you accuse me of stealing, then it must be good reasons. Feel free to move evidence.--Garrik1966 (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Garrik1966, I found this website. I'm not a Russian speaker, but it's look like this website is not in a free licence. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, So I placed a picture on the site. This is my profile on this site Garrik1966. To identify I wrote to you comments to this image.you letter--Garrik1966 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Garrik1966: Ok, nice. I've removed the deletion template. Thanks ! --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you too!--Garrik1966 (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly admin here! Could I ask for a fine tuning of how you do speedy deletion nominations? It would really rock if you would include the URL of the page on which you found the image; otherwise, you find it - then the closing admin has to go find it all over again. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll try to add an sample URL. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Pourrais-tu donner la source de l'image sur le Net ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drenowe (talk) 00:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Doesn't his give permission for the photo to be used?[reply]

w:en:Creative Commons attribution This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

   You are free:

       to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
       to remix – to adapt the work

   Under the following conditions:

       attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

w:en:Creative Commons

Doesn't the following permit the photo to be uploaded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drenowe (talk • contribs) 00:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

attribution This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

   You are free:

       to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
       to remix – to adapt the work

   Under the following conditions:

       attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amherstburg,_Gordon_House,_1798_wiki.1_jpg.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drenowe (talk • contribs) 00:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour (j'espère que le français convient),

Vous avez ajouté un bandeau d'admissibilité sur le poster de film que je viens d'uploader indiquant qu'« Il manque une preuve de permission pour ce fichier ». Je ne comprends pas car il s'agit d'une oeuvre anonyme publiée il y a plus de 60 ans (cela fera 79 ans dans 4 mois pour être exact) donc dans le domaine public en Inde, comme je l'ai indiqué. Le poster lui-même fait très probablement partie du fond du NFAI (National Film Archive of India) dont toutes les photographies antérieures à 1957 (aujourd'hui) sont dans le domaine public conformément à la législation indienne.

Pour information, ce film n'est jamais sorti ailleurs qu'en Inde et donc le poster n'a jamais été publié non plus ailleurs. De plus, le film est probablement perdu. Il ne reste aujourd'hui que ce poster, le "song booklet" et quelques photographies promotionnelles.

Cordialement, MelAntipam

MelAntipam: D'accord, vous avez raison, le poster est trop ancien pour être sous droits d'auteur. Merci de votre vigilance ! Cordialement --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(c'était marqué sur la page en dessous... pas vu, désolé) --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I am pretty new at Wikipedia and it was a first time upload to Wikimedia commons, so sorry if I violated any copyright rule for uploading a screenshot of Google Maps to Wikipedia

I consider my paragraph about the discovery of the remains of the lost castle an important contribution to Wikipedia and would like that the reader has the possibility to see for himself. I read that it is possible to add a geolocation of the place but as I am a rookie, I dont know how to add it.

Is anybody able to do this edit on my behalf?

Thanks

https://www.google.co.id/maps/place/Kappling,+4623+Gunskirchen,+Austria/@48.1454758,13.9122864,71m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4773f46f1a3fa303:0xa00a68facf83d2eb!8m2!3d48.1437!4d13.90289?hl=en

Please do a better research before tagging images uploaded by regulars, and better ask them when something is unclear to you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir ! Pourquoi avoir mis comme licence le domaine public pour File:Front-tres-popu.png ? Cordialement --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, Framawiki. Sauf quand elles dérivent d'un travail placé sous une licence précise, quand je suis le simple relais d'une œuvre existante ou quand leur objet ou leur sujet le requièrent, je place toutes mes contributions à Commons dans le domaine public. Ici, le sujet de l'image ne me semble pas susceptible de licence donc, domaine public. Bien à toi. O.M.H ♦ H.M.O 20:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

O.M.H: Pour moi, un screenshot est sous la même licence que celle de l'application en question, non ? --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C'est une question. Une capture plein écran ou la capture d'une part significative d'un écran, spécialement si elle intègre des éléments qui singularisent l'image, entre autre l'organisation de la page et les logos, pourrait être dans ce cas. La capture d'une part restreinte d'écran qui donne à voir du texte organisé de manière très convenue, en ce cas la forme devenue canonique pour les moteurs de recherche généraux ou locaux, ne me paraît pas susceptible de pouvoir faire l'objet d'une licence. En fait, même si cette capture est proprement identifiable comme provenant d'une page de Google c'est discutable : pratiquement tous les procès engagés par des entreprises du logiciel en se basant sur l'apparence, y compris fonctionnelle, de leur produit, ont conduit à un non-lieu, précisément parce qu'une présentation ne peut pas faire l'objet d'une licence, sauf comme mentionné quand des éléments ou l'ensemble de cette présentation (logos, nom de produit, organisation entièrement semblable de l'ensemble, ce qui en ces cas ressort de la copie ou du plagiat) peut être invoqué.

Là-dessus, si tu n'es pas convaincu par mes arguments tu peux, et je t'en remercie d'avance le cas échéant, m'indiquer quelle licence invoquer et en quels termes, ou faire toi-même la correction, ou rogner l'image pour qu'elle devienne vraiment anonyme (je pense à la partie inférieure, non nécessaire pour l'usage que j'en ai eu), ou demander la suppression de l'image s'il n'existe pas de licence compatible avec celle de Commons qu'on puisse utiliser. Cette dernière solution m'ennuierait, bien sûr, mais bon, ça ne serait pas bien grave non plus. Bien à toi et en tout cas, merci de ta vigilance. O.M.H ♦ H.M.O 22:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]