Five pillars of the administrative state: Judicial deference

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Administrative State Banner - Circle Graphic - V2.jpg
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png
Judicial deference
Judicial deference
Timeline
Court cases
Executive orders
Legislation
Arguments for and against
Reform proposals
Scholarly work
More pillars
Nondelegation
Executive control of agencies
Procedural rights
Agency dynamics

Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia


Judicial deference is one of five pillars key to understanding the main areas of debate about the nature and scope of the administrative state. Judicial deference to administrative agencies is a principle of judicial review that applies when a court yields to an agency's interpretation of either a statute or regulation promulgated by the agency. In other words, when a law or regulation is challenged in court, the agency's interpretation is upheld if it is considered to be reasonable, even if the court would prefer a different interpretation.

The following pages provide a deep dive into the history, application, and arguments for and against judicial deference:

Explore more pillars

See also

Footnotes