Osage vs Panamanian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Panamanian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Panamanians
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Panamanian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,686,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,759,434 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Panamanian |
Minimum | 0.88% | 0.96% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 21.5% |
Range | 27.7% | 20.5% |
Mean | 7.1% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Panamanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Colombian (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Cajun (5.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |