Chilean vs Central American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
Chilean
Central American Indian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chileans
Central American Indians
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Central American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,564,731 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 65.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,567 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 65.2%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 35.8% | 38.5% |
Maximum | 82.2% | 91.2% |
Range | 46.4% | 52.8% |
Mean | 66.3% | 67.5% |
Median | 66.7% | 66.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.0% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 74.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Central American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Spaniard (65.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (65.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |