Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,189,256 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $107,258, a difference of 19.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,503, a difference of 18.2%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $96,964, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $66,672, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $51,368, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.7%).